Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
Science seeks to explain that which is observable.
Yup, that is why the "BIG BANG" which very clearly appears ta be a creation event makes "ID" the most viable of the two opposing theories.

"Observable"........ me arse.........honk......honk


Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
Evolution, as a theory, is a product of this attempt.
What a silly post........


So is creation: Einstein.........


Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
Creation doesn't explain anything which is observable, so creation and evolution aren't competitive with one-another.
Wrong.....does yer brain werk at all?


Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
There are those who disavow creation because it bears no witness, but nonetheless have unanswered questions.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? Are you smokin' somethin' again?????

Both theories have "unanswered questions".....it is jus' the religion of Evolution that has FAR MORE......."unanswered questions"......burp......pffffft.....excuse me.


Quote Originally Posted by logroller View Post
I am inclined to a reasonable degree of faith in such cases, as that which is as yet unobservable may still exist.
Sooooooooooooooo yer a true believer in the religion of Evolution or some such.....? Ya really have problems with clear posts don't ya?