Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 145
  1. #106
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    In today's information age? They couldn't help but be exposed to it if they simply just turn on the computer.

    I, and most of my friends were politically aware in HS, and we only had the 6 o'clock news and newspaper.
    Nice sig line there Gunny - it would be good if some of the folks here read it and understood what Burke really meant.

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    Oh i have no doubt there should have been some inter school discipline. but making it a criminal offense? When its being suggested that if the kid did it again there would be violence against him? The threat of violence is far worse than anything that kid did and those suggesting violence should be punished far more than the kid who merely disrespected his classmates.
    I think if anyone was stupid enough to bring this to a court alleging a hate crime that the court would have a few words to say to the prosecutor an one just might be the old legal maxim of de minimis non curat lex - the law doesn't concern itself with trivialities (rough translation).

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    What a bullshit response. Making fun of diffenrent customs is part of American culture. The muzzies need to deal with that instead of trying to destroy our culture. I can't believe you could be an enabler.
    Can I make fun of American culture or will that make you very upset?

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    Not looking the other way will teach the muzzies that playing the victim works. That's why Europe is about to become Euro-arabia. We red meat Americans won't stand for it.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    Can I make fun of American culture or will that make you very upset?
    American culture is noble and dignified. Rush Limbaugh, Paris Hilton, Madonna, Oprah, 50 Cent, Jerry Springer, man how could you criticize that stuff?
    Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuc View Post
    One thing that's not being discussed in this debate is the obvious. Or maybe we're immune to the obviousness of this point:

    The prohibition against pork is stupid.
    Not if you're religious. But then religion is stupid so I suppose you're right in a way. Okay, the prohibition against pork is stupid because religion is stupid

  7. #112
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    Not if you're religious. But then religion is stupid so I suppose you're right in a way. Okay, the prohibition against pork is stupid because religion is stupid
    I think it's stupid because differentiating MORALLY between animals on similar levels of the food chain is stupid. Either you eat mammals or you don't. I can understand vegetarianism because in fact it's quite a different thing than being an omnivore. But if you eat any mammal you should be willing to eat any other similarly evolved mammal. I could understand refusing to eat simians because they are almost human, but dogs, cows, lambs, rabbits, cats.........and pigs, what difference does it make?
    Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.

  8. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    I think if anyone was stupid enough to bring this to a court alleging a hate crime that the court would have a few words to say to the prosecutor an one just might be the old legal maxim of de minimis non curat lex - the law doesn't concern itself with trivialities (rough translation).
    You'd be surprised what stupid stuff gets brought before a court.

  9. #114
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    You'd be surprised what stupid stuff gets brought before a court.
    I know what sometimes is tried on and why - and I know the courts (in my own area of course, can't speak for anywhere else) get quite cranky about it. And rightly so. Trivial stuff should be taken somewhere else. But then we - Australia - have enough tribunals that can deal with this sort of dispute. Since they exist they may as well work.

  10. #115
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuc View Post
    I think it's stupid because differentiating MORALLY between animals on similar levels of the food chain is stupid. Either you eat mammals or you don't. I can understand vegetarianism because in fact it's quite a different thing than being an omnivore. But if you eat any mammal you should be willing to eat any other similarly evolved mammal. I could understand refusing to eat simians because they are almost human, but dogs, cows, lambs, rabbits, cats.........and pigs, what difference does it make?
    It USED to make sense. I think it's in Leviticus that the dietary constraints are laid out (Leviticus in the Old Testament of the Christian Bible, the OT being the Tanakh in Judaism - not meaning to offend any Jews with the OT reference) and they made sense if you were a nomadic community living in a desert. Pig meat is notoriously full of all kinds of nasty stuff so it makes perfect sense to avoid it, I mean you wouldn't want a highly contagious intenstinal disease to sweep through your camp somewhere in the desert. But hanging onto the old ways when they have no use value in contemporary times is silly.

    Just a note - I'm not religious but I'll give anyone respect regarding their religious views so I am not canning anyone's religion here.

  11. #116
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    Can I make fun of American culture or will that make you very upset?
    It would make me happy.

  12. #117
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    It USED to make sense. I think it's in Leviticus that the dietary constraints are laid out (Leviticus in the Old Testament of the Christian Bible, the OT being the Tanakh in Judaism - not meaning to offend any Jews with the OT reference) and they made sense if you were a nomadic community living in a desert. Pig meat is notoriously full of all kinds of nasty stuff so it makes perfect sense to avoid it, I mean you wouldn't want a highly contagious intenstinal disease to sweep through your camp somewhere in the desert. But hanging onto the old ways when they have no use value in contemporary times is silly.

    Just a note - I'm not religious but I'll give anyone respect regarding their religious views so I am not canning anyone's religion here.
    Yes, but there are all kinds of food poisoning out there and they're all temporary. You don't make a religion about it. That's stupid.
    Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.

  13. #118
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    .... religion is stupid ...
    That statement is stoopid.

  14. #119
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    ... religion is stupid
    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    .... I'm not religious but I'll give anyone respect regarding their religious views so I am not canning anyone's religion here.
    Typical liberal hypocrisy.

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    That statement is stoopid.
    Damn that's witty.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums