Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,674
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    349125

    Default An Underlying Cause for Psychopathic Behavior?

    ScienceDaily (May 27, 2010) — Psychopaths are known to be characterized by callousness, diminished capacity for remorse, and lack of empathy. However, the exact cause of these personality traits is an area of scientific debate. The results of a new study, reported in the May 2010 issue of Elsevier's Cortex, show striking similarities between the mental impairments observed in psychopaths and those seen in patients with frontal lobe damage.

    One previous explanation for psychopathic tendencies has been a reduced capacity to make inferences about the mental states of other people, an ability known as Theory of Mind (ToM). On the other hand, psychopaths are also known to be extremely good manipulators and deceivers, which would imply that they have good skills in inferring the knowledge, needs, intentions, and beliefs of other people. Therefore, it has been suggested recently that ToM is made up of different aspects: a cognitive part, which requires inferences about knowledge and beliefs, and another part which requires the understanding of emotions.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427091723.htm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,991
    Thanks (Given)
    696
    Thanks (Received)
    461
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1985978

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chloe View Post
    ScienceDaily (May 27, 2010) — Psychopaths are known to be characterized by callousness, diminished capacity for remorse, and lack of empathy. However, the exact cause of these personality traits is an area of scientific debate. The results of a new study, reported in the May 2010 issue of Elsevier's Cortex, show striking similarities between the mental impairments observed in psychopaths and those seen in patients with frontal lobe damage.

    One previous explanation for psychopathic tendencies has been a reduced capacity to make inferences about the mental states of other people, an ability known as Theory of Mind (ToM). On the other hand, psychopaths are also known to be extremely good manipulators and deceivers, which would imply that they have good skills in inferring the knowledge, needs, intentions, and beliefs of other people. Therefore, it has been suggested recently that ToM is made up of different aspects: a cognitive part, which requires inferences about knowledge and beliefs, and another part which requires the understanding of emotions.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427091723.htm
    Well at least we can now understand Obama!
    Last edited by crin63; 05-30-2010 at 11:13 AM.
    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
    Samuel Adams


    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks (Given)
    4822
    Thanks (Received)
    4655
    Likes (Given)
    2518
    Likes (Received)
    1576
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075391

    Default

    Interesting... Some of us still just call it plain old sin, or the sin nature of man.

    the one thing I wonder about with this type of research is who is making the criteria. In different cultures what is considered cruel is different. If we started a thread here about spanking we'd might have a people thinking that it's cruel other not. Public flogging use to be acceptably. abortion is legal today...
    would they consider an abortion doctor a psychopath?
    see what i'm saying?
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,674
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    349125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by revelarts View Post
    Interesting... Some of us still just call it plain old sin, or the sin nature of man.

    the one thing I wonder about with this type of research is who is making the criteria. In different cultures what is considered cruel is different. If we started a thread here about spanking we'd might have a people thinking that it's cruel other not. Public flogging use to be acceptably. abortion is legal today...
    would they consider an abortion doctor a psychopath?
    see what i'm saying?
    Yeah but I think baby killers are psychopaths because that is like someone murdering an innocent human.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums