WMDs and lies

[diuretic]

Please, Democrats were going to claim he planted them regardless of whether he did or not.

And you know that how? Or is that just a hyperbolic claim made for effect but not meant to be taken seriously?

It would be hard to make them look like lunatics. especially since these are the same people claiming that 911 was a government conspiracy. And that would have been far more complex than this one.

Who are the people claiming 9/11 was a government conspiracy?

[diuretic]

You're somewhat of a simpleton aren't you?

If you're unable to work out my post just ask for an explanation. Insulting me with childish taunts just makes you look foolish.

[diuretic]

tenet just said as much on 60 minutes...

"Said as much" is an equivocation. What exactly did Tenet say?

[diuretic]

Come on you blokes, lift your bloody game. It's three on one and you still can't muster enough logic to make sense.

[-Cp]

The US, the Chinese, Japan, Europeans countries aren't getting the oil. Companies are negotiating oil contracts but of course with the help of their government representatives. Our government in Australia is particularly keen to see one of our companies get its chop - http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...nfidential.pdf - since we lost our wheat contract in Iraq, US farmers have benefited from the invasion and occupation, our government is in there trying to get BHP-Billiton a foothold in the frantic carpetbagging that's going on.

Perhaps, but the Oil Ministry was numero uno on the mission objectives list.

Now, given the detailed presentation of the locations of WMD in Iraq, it shouldn't have take a month to find them anyway. Conclusion - they weren't there. They didn't exist.

Perhaps you need to read this:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/05/news..._oil/index.htm

Despite claims by some critics that the Bush administration invaded Iraq to take control of its oil, the first contracts with major oil firms from Iraq's new government are likely to go not to U.S. companies, but rather to companies from China, India, Vietnam, and Indonesia.

[diuretic]

Perhaps you need to read this:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/05/news..._oil/index.htm

Despite claims by some critics that the Bush administration invaded Iraq to take control of its oil, the first contracts with major oil firms from Iraq's new government are likely to go not to U.S. companies, but rather to companies from China, India, Vietnam, and Indonesia.

Yes I knew that, but I appreciate your pointing it out.

[Sitarro]

Yes I knew that, but I appreciate your pointing it out.

And yet you continue to let everyone know how silly you are by repeating the old standard bullshit found on all radical leftist web sites. It is you that isn't worth any effort at all, don't you have a kangaroo waiting for you?

I'm bored with you and while I won't bother to put you on ignore, I will not respond to your infant like attempts at attention.....bahh-bye.

[avatar4321]

And you know that how? Or is that just a hyperbolic claim made for effect but not meant to be taken seriously?





Who are the people claiming 9/11 was a government conspiracy?

Because I saw Democrats claiming he was going to plant evidence.

you are not that naive to tell me you dont know who is claiming 9/11 was a government conspiracy.

[manu1959]

"Said as much" is an equivocation. What exactly did Tenet say?

that he believed wmds were there....

[diuretic]

And yet you continue to let everyone know how silly you are by repeating the old standard bullshit found on all radical leftist web sites. It is you that isn't worth any effort at all, don't you have a kangaroo waiting for you?

I'm bored with you and while I won't bother to put you on ignore, I will not respond to your infant like attempts at attention.....bahh-bye.

I think you mean "infantile-like attempts at attention."

[diuretic]

Because I saw Democrats claiming he was going to plant evidence.

you are not that naive to tell me you dont know who is claiming 9/11 was a government conspiracy.

For what it's worth I have read - not a lot because I find it a bit tiresome to be blunt - about the Let It Happen On Purpose and Made It Happen On Purpose. I don't believe either "theory". I stay away from anything that looks like it's going to morph into LIHOP/MIHOP.

[diuretic]

that he believed wmds were there....

I appreciate the clarification, thanks - no, this is not sarcasm.

[Sitarro]

I think you mean "infantile-like attempts at attention."

I really didn't want to respond but, if I wanted to write infantile, I would have just written infantile. The dash and the word 'like" isn't needed in that case, why would you think it was? I find it cute that you would attempt to correct my grammar but really, I don't want nor do I need your help.

How is that roo?

[diuretic]

I really didn't want to respond but, if I wanted to write infantile, I would have just written infantile. The dash and the word 'like" isn't needed in that case, why would you think it was? I find it cute that you would attempt to correct my grammar but really, I don't want nor do I need your help.

How is that roo?

An infantile-like attempt.

[Sitarro]

An infantile-like attempt.

You're wrong ace......An unfantile attempt would be correct.....then again infant-like is also correct. Your correction was wrong...live with it.

in·fan·tile
Pronunciation: 'in-f&n-"tI(-&)l, -t&l, -"tEl, -(")til
Function: adjective
1 : of or relating to infants or infancy
2 : suitable to or characteristic of an infant; especially : very immature <infantile humor>
- in·fan·til·i·ty /"in-f&n-'ti-l&-tE/ noun