Originally Posted by
Missileman
No rational person could reasonably have a problem with that.
maybe, In that particular case, however does this set a precedent for more?
That guy encouraged a shooter in line with radical Muslim teachings is my understanding.
Encouraged to take lives of Americans.
Bad Guy not doubt.
Now he's considered a terrorist.
The flood of new laws makes it so a terrorist has practically no rights. Gitmo is to good for um, send them to secret prisons or shoot them dead with a drone, torture, spy, whatever it takes the gov't has FREE REIGN to do whatever it takes to get that guy.
basically NO RIGHTS. Life nope, Search-nope, property-nope, council-hah.
now,
There are a few people on this board that have said they it might be necessary to take up arms against the US gov't. How easy would it be to declare them... us terrorist?
Am I way out in oz here?
It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God. 1 Peter 2:16