Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,427
    Thanks (Given)
    5592
    Thanks (Received)
    6639
    Likes (Given)
    5393
    Likes (Received)
    3998
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The suit that my cousin's husband has helped file does not challenge SB 1070 itself. Only challenges how it is enforced.
    Currently, law enforcement is allowed to question people based on their perception of who might be an illegal immigrant. Factors could include language spoken, how the person is dressed and where their vehicle is registered.
    If his challenge is upheld, law enforcement will be required to question the legal status of everyone. Otherwise, enforcement would be discriminatory and thus illegal.
    A precedent is in current state border crossings between Texas and New Mexico and NM/Arizona. There is a checkpoint where they ask everyone if they are U.S. citizens.

    I certainly hope Arizona has enough in its state treasury to defend the dozen or more challenges now on tap for SB 1070. The state is currently considering requesting federal aid to defend itself. Which I hope the Obama administration would laugh heartily at.
    This may be a stupid question .... but, how many people who are stopped by cops for something are not asked for their I.D.? I still haven't figured out this one .... example: cop stops a jaywalker and decides to give them a ticket. He asks for their I.D. ..... and bingo ... they are either legal and have I.D. or they don't have I.D. and they go to jail.

    How is this law going to change that?
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgia!
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks (Given)
    738
    Thanks (Received)
    673
    Likes (Given)
    1133
    Likes (Received)
    827
    Piss Off (Given)
    24
    Piss Off (Received)
    1
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1203903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    You might not be an American if....

    You don't speak English.
    Profilin, Huh?!! Carry on !!!!
    UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION

    Above the Best

    Why the Hell should I have to press “1” for ENGLISH?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457675

    Default

    wonder why Osama has never been to AZ ????

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks (Given)
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    1501
    Likes (Given)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2067947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    If his challenge is upheld, law enforcement will be required to question the legal status of everyone.
    Keep in mind that little gabby is a blinders-on liberal fanatic.

    She wants very much for police to be going around demanding "Your papers, please!" of EVERYONE.
    Last edited by Little-Acorn; 07-27-2010 at 10:12 AM.
    "The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    143
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The suit that my cousin's husband has helped file does not challenge SB 1070 itself. Only challenges how it is enforced.
    Currently, law enforcement is allowed to question people based on their perception of who might be an illegal immigrant. Factors could include language spoken, how the person is dressed and where their vehicle is registered.
    If his challenge is upheld, law enforcement will be required to question the legal status of everyone. Otherwise, enforcement would be discriminatory and thus illegal.
    A precedent is in current state border crossings between Texas and New Mexico and NM/Arizona. There is a checkpoint where they ask everyone if they are U.S. citizens.

    I certainly hope Arizona has enough in its state treasury to defend the dozen or more challenges now on tap for SB 1070. The state is currently considering requesting federal aid to defend itself. Which I hope the Obama administration would laugh heartily at.
    To become a citizen of this country you have to pass an English Proficiency Test. If an officer asks you for I.D. and you need an interpreter to understand what he is saying, chances are you are illegal!

    An illegal immigrant just killed a 70 year old man in my state, in a car accident. This person had no idea what the officer was saying to her until they brought in a translator. Needless to say she had no license and should not have been on the highway in the first place, but she didn't care. Why should she care about the law? She's not legal in the first place.

    http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/...r-U-S-41-crash
    Last edited by sybarite; 07-27-2010 at 10:46 PM.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306081

    Default

    The challenge to SB 1070 have been SUCCESSFUL!! Apparently the lawyers involved in the case (my cousin's husband included) were able to convince the presiding judge that the current legislation relies too heavily on racial profiling.

    http://www.latimes.com/la-na-arizona...,3606702.story

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The challenge to SB 1070 have been SUCCESSFUL!! Apparently the lawyers involved in the case (my cousin's husband included) were able to convince the presiding judge that the current legislation relies too heavily on racial profiling.

    http://www.latimes.com/la-na-arizona...,3606702.story
    It will be overturned on appeal Gabby. This judge said being an illegal is illegal - but the state can't enforce an existing Federal law????

    This is a major factor as to why your state is going broke. The cost of illegals continues to grow and YOU seem to be wiling to continue to pay, and pay, and pay for it


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,427
    Thanks (Given)
    5592
    Thanks (Received)
    6639
    Likes (Given)
    5393
    Likes (Received)
    3998
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The challenge to SB 1070 have been SUCCESSFUL!! Apparently the lawyers involved in the case (my cousin's husband included) were able to convince the presiding judge that the current legislation relies too heavily on racial profiling.

    http://www.latimes.com/la-na-arizona...,3606702.story
    So?

    If stats say that the majority of illegals in this country are of a specific nationality .... then why wouldn't our law enforcement be on the lookout for that profile?

    What do you think police are doing when they start profiling a serial killer ... they start by looking at white males in their 20s or 30s.......so, tell me again why profiling is wrong?
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default



    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,322
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7822

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The challenge to SB 1070 have been SUCCESSFUL!! Apparently the lawyers involved in the case (my cousin's husband included) were able to convince the presiding judge that the current legislation relies too heavily on racial profiling.

    http://www.latimes.com/la-na-arizona...,3606702.story
    Odd. The way I read the decision was more along the lines of "allowing AZ to enforce their state law would create an undue burden on the Federal government in enforcing their own regulations." This comes dangerously close to putting the policies of POTUS (not enforcing border security) ahead of state sovereignty and the duty of state officials to protect their citizenry.

    I expect the AZ legislature to move rapidly to amend SB 1070 to address some of the judge's verbiage concerns ("must check" to "may check", etc.) And I expect that the preemption argument is at best a 50-50 proposition after arguments have been heard and appeals processed.
    “Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face” - Thomas Sowell

    “What "multiculturalism" boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture - and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture” - Thomas Sowell

  11. #26
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457675

    Default

    as long as all the illegals go to mexifornia im happy. its a welfare state anyway. let them pay for it. better them than us

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,322
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7822

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    as long as all the illegals go to mexifornia im happy. its a welfare state anyway. let them pay for it. better them than us
    ... as long as the rest of the country doesn't have to bail out California's fiscal mess.
    “Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face” - Thomas Sowell

    “What "multiculturalism" boils down to is that you can praise any culture in the world except Western culture - and you cannot blame any culture in the world except Western culture” - Thomas Sowell

  13. #28
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457675

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CockySOB View Post
    ... as long as the rest of the country doesn't have to bail out California's fiscal mess.
    snif...........I smell revolution

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    The challenge to SB 1070 have been SUCCESSFUL!! Apparently the lawyers involved in the case (my cousin's husband included) were able to convince the presiding judge that the current legislation relies too heavily on racial profiling.

    http://www.latimes.com/la-na-arizona...,3606702.story
    so they change it so that EVERYONES status is checked. Problem solved.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    5,457
    Thanks (Given)
    14
    Thanks (Received)
    714
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1515011

    Default

    Susie Baker, 53, who remodels homes in Tucson, felt differently. "I am thrilled," she said as she headed into the store. "I think Jan Brewer is out of her mind. She is bringing harm to Arizona."

    Baker said she often hires Latinos on home projects, and doesn't ask them their immigration status.
    I loved this part, that the LA Times was so hard up to find someone who disagreed with the law that they had to go to someone who was a contributing part of the problem. Of course the people who are hiring day laborers with no thought to whether they are citizens or not are going to have issue with being taken to task on it.
    "Government screws up everything. If government says black, you can bet it's white. If government says sit still for your safety, you'd better run for your life!"
    --Wayne Allyn Root
    www.rootforamerica.com
    www.FairTax.org

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums