Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,984
    Thanks (Given)
    34378
    Thanks (Received)
    26494
    Likes (Given)
    2388
    Likes (Received)
    10009
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default Chinese test missile obliterates satellite

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- China last week successfully used a missile to destroy an orbiting satellite, U.S. government officials told CNN on Thursday, in a test that could undermine relations with the West and pose a threat to satellites important to the U.S. military.

    According to a spokesman for the National Security Council, the ground-based, medium-range ballistic missile knocked an old Chinese weather satellite from its orbit about 537 miles above Earth. The missile carried a "kill vehicle" and destroyed the satellite by ramming it.

    The test took place on January 11. (Watch why the U.S. has protested the missile strike )

    Aviation Week and Space Technology first reported the test: "Details emerging from space sources indicate that the Chinese Feng Yun 1C (FY-1C) polar orbit weather satellite launched in 1999 was attacked by an asat (anti-satellite) system launched from or near the Xichang Space Center."

    A U.S. official, who would not agree to be identified, said the event was the first successful test of the missile after three failures.

    The official said that U.S. "space tracking sensors" confirmed that the satellite is no longer in orbit and that the collision produced "hundreds of pieces of debris," that also are being tracked.

    The United States logged a formal diplomatic protest.

    "We are aware of it and we are concerned, and we made it known," said White House spokesman Tony Snow.

    Several U.S. allies, including Canada and Australia, also have registered protests.

    Under a space policy authorized by President Bush in August, the United States asserts a right to "freedom of action in space" and says it will "deter others from either impeding those rights or developing capabilities intended to do so."

    The policy includes the right to "deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to U.S. national interests."

    Low Earth-orbit satellites have become indispensable for U.S. military communications, GPS navigation for smart bombs and troops, and for real-time surveillance. The Chinese test highlights the satellites' vulnerability.

    "If we, for instance, got into a conflict over Taiwan, one of the first things they'd probably do would be to shoot down all of our lower Earth-orbit spy satellites, putting out our eyes," said John Pike of globalsecurity.org, a Web site that compiles information on worldwide security issues.

    "The thing that is surprising and disturbing is that [the Chinese] have chosen this moment to demonstrate a military capability that can only be aimed at the United States," he said.

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/0...ile/index.html

    I'd say this is a real threat to strategic superiority.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    O-hi-o
    Posts
    12,192
    Thanks (Given)
    8017
    Thanks (Received)
    1650
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3656128

    Default

    It's definately a threat. I believe china has military intentions in the not too distant future. Something like this means they are getting closer to what they plan to do. Might be a warning concerning NK. That if we move against NK they will take down our satelites. It's a very ominus move on their part.
    When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.

    You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    It's definately a threat. I believe china has military intentions in the not too distant future. Something like this means they are getting closer to what they plan to do. Might be a warning concerning NK. That if we move against NK they will take down our satelites. It's a very ominus move on their part.
    They have to do something for all those men to get women...

    Sadly the world will soon be covered in bloodshed. Maybe we can stop them though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    O-hi-o
    Posts
    12,192
    Thanks (Given)
    8017
    Thanks (Received)
    1650
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3656128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    They have to do something for all those men to get women...

    Sadly the world will soon be covered in bloodshed. Maybe we can stop them though.
    I read an article a while back. Don't remember where. But it was about chinese expansion. They need resources. Especially oil. The article discussed their use of naval forces in the Indian Ocean and tying up our forces around Taiwan and Japan and pushing into Russia to capture the oil fields there. If they could do that they would not need the middle east and would just disrupt oil flow from there to the rest of the world. Made for an interesting read and made a lot of sense. This could be the first step toward that as the author said it was about 20 years away from actually taking this action.
    When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.

    You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,984
    Thanks (Given)
    34378
    Thanks (Received)
    26494
    Likes (Given)
    2388
    Likes (Received)
    10009
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    I read an article a while back. Don't remember where. But it was about chinese expansion. They need resources. Especially oil. The article discussed their use of naval forces in the Indian Ocean and tying up our forces around Taiwan and Japan and pushing into Russia to capture the oil fields there. If they could do that they would not need the middle east and would just disrupt oil flow from there to the rest of the world. Made for an interesting read and made a lot of sense. This could be the first step toward that as the author said it was about 20 years away from actually taking this action.
    Which is a damned-good reason for us to get off our butts and come up with an alternative fuel source. We do not need to keep maintaining our position of being at the mercy of he who controls the oil when that is subject to change at any moment.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    O-hi-o
    Posts
    12,192
    Thanks (Given)
    8017
    Thanks (Received)
    1650
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3656128

    Default

    Yep. We need to relax the restrictions on drilling in this country and use that while we develope other sources. Get rid of oil use completely.
    When I die I'm sure to go to heaven, cause I spent my time in hell.

    You get more with a kind word and a two by four, than you do with just a kind word.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums