Outed gay CEO resigns post

[OCA]

What distorted "logic" that is. We've spent billions on research over the decades and there are still some questions that haven't been answered as a result of all that research. To infer that the lack of finding a gay gene means that being gay is a "choice" is ridiculous. Like I said before, I didn't "choose" to be heterosexual.

The queer gene doesn't exist, get over it.

[avatar4321]

I never understood that being gay is a "choice" claim. I'm definitely hetero, and I just don't remember deciding one day that that's the way I'd go. I just was. When I became a teen, I was attracted to the opposite sex, not my own.

Obviously then you don't understand that there are actually three choices. 1)choose to be gay. 2) Choose to be straight. 3) choose nothing; then default kicks in and you are straight.

[OCA]

Obviously then you don't understand that there are actually three choices. 1)choose to be gay. 2) Choose to be straight. 3) choose nothing; then default kicks in and you are straight.

100% correct, it has to be a choice. Its a choice to blow another guy or snack on another chick, a conscious choice.

[Birdzeye]

The queer gene doesn't exist, get over it.

That doesn't mean that being gay is a "choice." Genetics doesn't explain everything.

[Birdzeye]

Obviously then you don't understand that there are actually three choices. 1)choose to be gay. 2) Choose to be straight. 3) choose nothing; then default kicks in and you are straight.

I don't remember a "choice" being involved in the first place. Your logic is flawed, just as OCA's is. "Choose nothing" does not mean that a "default" kicks in to make one straight.

[OCA]

I don't remember a "choice" being involved in the first place. Your logic is flawed, just as OCA's is. "Choose nothing" does not mean that a "default" kicks in to make one straight.

Every human being is born with an inate attraction to the opposite sex.

[OCA]

That doesn't mean that being gay is a "choice." Genetics doesn't explain everything.

Care to explain what else explains it and please don't give me the crap about a womb event.

[Birdzeye]

Care to explain what else explains it and please don't give me the crap about a womb event.

I don't have one. That does not mean that it's a "choice." It just means that we still don't know.

[avatar4321]

I don't remember a "choice" being involved in the first place. Your logic is flawed, just as OCA's is. "Choose nothing" does not mean that a "default" kicks in to make one straight.

There is nothing flawed about my logic. Simply saying its flawed does not make it so. Your logic is flawed if you actually believe that was a logical response.

[OCA]

I don't have one. That does not mean that it's a "choice." It just means that we still don't know.

No, it means we do know, if you find nothing there pretty much is nothing, to think anything else is ludicrous.

[loosecannon]

Many decades and billions of dollars spent on finding the queer gene and to date nothing, not even anything remotely close, by logic and default homosexuality is a lifestyle choice. Please provide irrefuteable proof that queer is by birth.

Please kiss my ass, nicely, very nicely.

Nobody has to provide you with proof OCA, YOU made an assertion.

YOU provide proof. But regarding your pathetic idea about the "gay gene". There are LOTS of ways that people could become gay without it being choice driven other than a determining "gay gene".

It could be an environmental influence that causes it, or a hormone imbalance.

I have absolutely NO idea what makes people gay. Neither do YOU.

And I don't really care, but you sure seem to get a big woodie talking about those "lifestyle choices".

Again, what special expertise do you have to know so much about the determinism of Gay? Are you a been there done that kinda guy?

Please use actual debating skills in this one time on DP, your ad hom tacticts are not working, but then again you suck goose shit at debating and we all know it

Fumduck. Asking you if you are gay is not an ad hom. Esp when you claim to have special knowledge of the realities of gay existence.

It is just a reasonable question regarding your qualified expertise on the topic.

Although the queer who was allowed at press briefings or whatever should not have been simply because he had chosen to be queer he was allowed, if he wasn't you all would be screaming discrimination at the top of your lungs.

He wasn't just invited he was a chosen member of the White House press corp. Which means he traveled with the president and was invited to the WH chriostmas party, dinners, formal events etc. Somewhere in cyber space is a photo of GWB petting his head. Jeff gannon's head that is, the big one above his neck.

Jeff Gannon wasn't even a reporter. He was a gay prostitute with an escort service called "military studs are us".

One really MUST wonder how a Gay hooker with no journalism background managed to get

A) invited to join the elite White House press corp

B) past the FBI sucurity screening

Please provide irrefuteable proof he was there after hours because your libelous slander wears thin on the entire board, your cooperation is appreciated in advance.

You better watch your mouth buttboy or i will post pics of gannon getting his head waxed by GWB.

I will get around to providing proof when I have time but for a start google

"Jeff Gannon", "WH Press Corp"

exactly as it is spelled above.

you really are a feeble fool OCA. And your obvious expertise about Gay lifestyle choices is intruiging.

[Guernicaa]

lol

[Guernicaa]

The queer gene doesn't exist, get over it.

Oh really? Do you have proof to back that up?
Maybe a link to some research done on the topic?
Or maybe your just making assumptions on homosexuality?
Or maybeeee....Your just another right-wing sexual hypocrite that pretends to enjoy bashing gay people at the expense of their own insecurities.

[loosecannon]

[OCA]

And this is supposed to mean what? Bush is queer?