NAACP launches coalition watchdog site to ‘monitor’ Tea Party ‘racists’

[Pagan]

Who's he supposed to be "racist" against, himself? He's clearly mixed.

You are quite the ignorant fuck aren't you?

[Agnapostate]

You are quite the ignorant fuck aren't you?

I didn't think you knew the answer, Chafin', having been dropped on your head repeatedly as a baby as you were.

[Trigg]

Who's he supposed to be "racist" against, himself? He's clearly mixed.

tell him that

“The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go down into the late of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years.”
– Louis Farrakhan, City College audience in New York

Other quotes.

http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008...ersial-quotes/

[BoogyMan]

I am not a "liberal." That said, this sentiment is one of racial resentment, a facet of "angry white male" syndrome. It's repeated by many white supremacists. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t696224/

That's because they are at their core socially right-wing and share the same underlying moral views as mainline rightists. They regard ethnic minorities as disproportionate violators of their moral codes (high welfare users, etc.), with Tea Partiers more likely to make a subconscious association between their race and their immorality because their ethnicity functions as a convenient mechanism for quick categorizations and generalizations, and white nationalists and other supremacists having transformed this into an explicit connection.

Your reference to me as a "liberal" is amusing, if nothing else. Perhaps you should capitalize on the fact that I'm far to the left of any liberal? I am an anarcho-communist.

That is a common sentiment of white nationalists, who depict different ethnic groups as possessing innate gene-based behavioral differences.

This is some of the funniest stuff you have written to date and it proves my assertions directly. I disgree with you and you try to make a case that I am some kind of racist.

Are you paid to post silly garbage like this to caricature the typical liberal?

[Agnapostate]

tell him that

That he's mixed-blooded? It's quite obvious that he is, given his phenotype. That said, it's simply a historical reality that it's been Europeans, particularly Western Europeans, who have been the greatest imperialists and colonialists of the past few centuries, invading every other inhabitable continent and commencing the invasion of America even as the Moorish occupation was expelled from Iberia.

This is some of the funniest stuff you have written to date and it proves my assertions directly.

While I agree that your posts consist of assertions (rather than arguments), that's about it.

I disgree with you and you try to make a case that I am some kind of racist.

If you are claiming that people who claim that there are behavioral genetic differences between races/ethnic groups and believe negative stereotypes about racial/ethnic minorities far more than the general population are not "racists," I'd question that judgment.

Are you paid to post silly garbage like this to caricature the typical liberal?

Since I am not a liberal, a fact that apparently cannot penetrate your thick skull, I would say not.

[Trigg]

That he's mixed-blooded? It's quite obvious that he is, given his phenotype. That said, it's simply a historical reality that it's been Europeans, particularly Western Europeans, who have been the greatest imperialists and colonialists of the past few centuries, invading every other inhabitable continent and commencing the invasion of America even as the Moorish occupation was expelled from Iberia.

Oh I don't argue that he's got some white in him. That doesn't make him any less of a racist, his quotes prove that.

[BoogyMan]

While I agree that your posts consist of assertions (rather than arguments), that's about it.

I am not the one defending the idea that the TEA party is made up of racists and certainly not the one here who is continuing the redefinition of the term so that it no longer has any meaning or effect.

If you are claiming that people who claim that there are behavioral genetic differences between races/ethnic groups and believe negative stereotypes about racial/ethnic minorities far more than the general population are not "racists," I'd question that judgment.

So now, those who believe stereotypes are racists as well?? You toss out the term racist without any real understanding of what the term means just as does the whole of the modern left and don't understand why people constantly call you out on it?

Since I am not a liberal, a fact that apparently cannot penetrate your thick skull, I would say not.

When one is so far left that Ted Kennedy looks like a radical right winger, one might assume you to be a liberal, don't you think?

[revelarts]

there are racist in the Tea Party
There are racist in the NAACP
There are racist on this board.
guess what, this is America. Sadly we've got to live with that.

The Tea Party however isn't founded on racism, it's political request aren't racist.
The NAACP was founded to help Blacks when they were being treated like crap by whites only a few decades ago. It's was founded to counter heavy and oppressive racism.

the NAACP has a lens of America that is based on a set of FACTS they are intimately acquainted with in the past that color (no pun intended) everything they do. But, of course, its major thrust been co-oped by the left. When racism is really not a left right issue.
There are plenty of racist union democrats. I wish someone would track that.

The Best thing for the Tea Party to do is to stay on message and not get emotionally drawn into battles that don't deal with the problems we ALL face with this out of control gov't. If most of us really aren't racist then a lot of regular people who think for themselves will figure it out. the uniformed and Uber partisans will spout the party line no matter what.

[BoogyMan]

there are racist in the Tea Party
There are racist in the NAACP
There are racist on this board.
guess what, this is America. Sadly we've got to live with that.

The Tea Party however isn't founded on racism, it's political request aren't racist.
The NAACP was founded to help Blacks when they were being treated like crap by whites only a few decades ago. It's was founded counter heavy and oppressive racism.

the NAACP has a lens of America that is based on a set of FACTS they are intimately acquainted with in the past that color (no pun intended) everything they do. But, of course, its major thrust been co-oped by the left. When racism is really not a left right issue.
There are plenty of racist union democrats. I wish someone would track that.

The Best thing for the Tea Party to do is to stay on message and not get emotionally drawn into battles that don't deal with the problems we ALL face with this out of control gov't. If most of us really aren't racist then a lot of regular people who think for themselves will figure it out. the uniformed and Uber partisans will spout the party line no matter what.

The uber partisans in this care are the Soros funded organizations listed as sponsors along with the NAACP. Not only has the NAACP made a mockery of their own claimed ideals in their tie to this organizations and its claims, but they have pretty much abandoned their purpose for existence in the advancement of false claims.

[REDWHITEBLUE2]

I am not a "liberal

I agree your not a Liberal YOU'RE far worse a Commie Socialist

[Agnapostate]

Oh I don't argue that he's got some white in him. That doesn't make him any less of a racist, his quotes prove that.

Have you ever asked yourself why you're so desperate to research information on "black" or "minority racism," when "white" racism is far more prevalent and actually has opportunities for institutional systemic enactment, in contrast to black racism only having such opportunities in Zimbabwe or some other such place, and only in response to a legacy of European colonialism? It's because of your white populism. Now, Farrakhan used generalizing language, but accurately described the nature of Western European harm to the world.

I am not the one defending the idea that the TEA party is made up of racists and certainly not the one here who is continuing the redefinition of the term so that it no longer has any meaning or effect.

Actually, I described the membership base as more prone to racism than the general population because they perceived racial/ethnic minorities as disproportionate offenders of their moral codes, and made subconscious generalizations about them as a result. You did nothing to refute this. I also pointed out that they shared foundations with overt white supremacists, which led their movement to appeal to them:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t696224/#post7969941

Basically, the Tea Partiers just want to be left alone by the government, and I don't think they have much more ideology than that. Less Government, Less Taxes, Less Bureacracy, less government Social Engineering, thats the tea partier goal. Because, this is in direct contradiction of the Multicults program, more government to make more social Engineering, enforced by thugs with guns and billy clubs at any expense, the Tea Partiers are on the firing line. However the Multicult can't just come out and say, "you want too much freedom, you want too much liberty" they instead call them Racists. And Academia, supports this by defining Racist as anyone who doesn't want to be socially engineered.

The people on SF who call themselves WN, for the most part, just want to be left alone by the government, they don't want to be social engineered either. However, because social engineering is painful and oppressive, many people are radicallized and pushed into a rage, and basically provoked into being "mean". And then of course the Multicult points to the result while ignoring the cause.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t696224/#post7970240

No one knows if the 90% number is accurate. As a Tea Party member I can say that Whites are a majority in the Tea Party movement, but then again whites are the majority in this country. Whites are the majority of taxpayers and true conservatives. There are a few black and hispanic members of the Tea Party but I think the reason for this is the fact that most blacks and hispanics are liberals, not true conservatives.

True conservatives believe in a small central government with little taxation and governmental intrusion, self reliance, and the freedom to succeed or fail according to each individuals' abilities. Liberals are just the opposite. They believe in a large government with the power to punish those who succeed through taxation, legislation and the redistribution of wealth in order to achieve "social justice".

The Tea Party is accused of racism simply because they disagree with the policies of President Obama because he is black. The real truth is that President Obama is a socialist and socialism is the direct opposite of conservatism.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t696224/#post7977542

As for race, most do seem to be White. But so what? Maybe its because its mostly the White middle class that pays all the taxes?

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t696224/#post7977899

This is the oldest political tactic in the book. If you can't discredit the argument, discredit the people behind the argument. This is also a worn out adage here, white people in a group must be racist. It's crap.

As far as I can discern, all of these quotes by self-identified white nationalists could have been written by mainline rightists on this forum.

So now, those who believe stereotypes are racists as well?? You toss out the term racist without any real understanding of what the term means just as does the whole of the modern left and don't understand why people constantly call you out on it?

Yes. Astonishingly, I dare to presume that people who believe that ethnic minorities are prone to laziness and stupidity might be "racist."

When one is so far left that Ted Kennedy looks like a radical right winger, one might assume you to be a liberal, don't you think?

No, far to the left of one.

I agree your not a Liberal YOU'RE far worse a Commie Socialist

See that, BoogerCan? That's better.

[revelarts]

"Mankind is divided into rich and poor, into property owners and exploited; and to abstract oneself from this fundamental division; and from the antagonism between poor and rich means abstracting oneself from fundamental facts."
Joseph Stalin

“...Why would we let them have guns?”
Joseph Stalin

"Enable every woman who can work to take her place on the labour front, under the principle of equal pay for equal work."
Mao Tse-Tung

"Genuine equality between the sexes can only be realized in the process of the socialist transformation of society as a whole."
Mao Tse-Tung

"Let a hundred flowers bloom, let a hundred schools of thought contend."
Mao Tse-Tung



These's words could have been said by any left winger on this board.It is Obvious that what they really are are MASS MURDERERS ready to kill off millions for the Communist "revolutionary" cause.

Stalin and Mao are Communist.
Stalin and Mao are tyrannical mass murderers.
Conclusion, All Communist are tyrannical mass murders

Agnapostate is a communist
therefore he is a tyrannical mass murderer

[Agnapostate]

Agnapostate is a communist
therefore he is a tyrannical mass murderer

Actually, an anarchist, which renders your pointless exercise even more so on closer inspection.

[Pagan]

Actually, an anarchist, which renders your pointless exercise even more so on closer inspection.

You're far from being an Anarchist, what you spew here is Socialism. I very highly doubt you even know what Anarchism is you ignorant fuck.

[Agnapostate]

You're far from being an Anarchist, what you spew here is Socialism. I very highly doubt you even know what Anarchism is you ignorant fuck.

This stupid idiocy transcends the usual crack baby rants that you piss on the board, since anarchism is an explicitly socialist ideology. http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionA1