Against what was my initial and probably my better judgment, but on the advice of others, I am going to make one last attempt to reasonably engage this poster. Anarchism, as a social ideology, has always been characterized by advocacy of stateless socialism (decentralized networks of workers' ownership and management of the means of production), in contrast to the hierarchical labor markets and firm structures of capitalism, the earlier authoritarianism of feudalism, or the later authoritarianism of Leninism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre-Joseph_Proudhon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Bakunin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kropotkin
Anarchist Communism: Its Basis and Principles, by Kropotkin.
Now, if you'd be generous enough to elaborate for us on your own personal vision of anarchism and the theory and practice that contributed to that vision, I would be willing to read that exposition. So it's on you now...
What you're attempting to refer to is an inductive and informal logical fallacy called an association fallacy, which is a type of hasty generalization and red herring.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/guiltbya.html
The problem is that your post is a strawman, which was revealed when you decided to go extremely overboard at the end. In one circumstance, there is the case of irrelevant correlation between social rightists and overt white nationalists. With the bit about the glass and plate, you implied that I had picked up on such an irrelevant correlation. However, I specified
foundational moral beliefs that were shared between the two groups, not trivial similarities that could be shared by anyone. Those foundational moral beliefs are voluntarily held by a distinct segment of the population that both groups happen to belong to. And it remains my contention that rightists are more inclined to racist generalizations and stereotypes because they perceive minority groups as more frequent offenders of their moral codes, and have a greater potential for transformation of that into an explicit outlook.
In the words of white supremacist leader Alex Linder:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...04&postcount=2
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...19&postcount=6
This connection is made clearer by the fact that there are a number of groups (VDARE.com, AmRen, the Council of Conservative Citizens, etc.) and individuals (Pat Buchanan, Peter Brimelow, etc.) who straddle the line between social rightism and white nationalism, which is because there are common themes of white ethnic populism and racial resentment. It's very interesting that there are a number of members here insistent that they can define an ideology better than its self-described adherents.
Actually, you're not, since the topic is white Tea Party racism, not Louis Farrakhan.
What kind of person is that? Another person who is "racist" against his own white blood, his own European admixture?