Quote Originally Posted by dmp View Post
Your data sucks because:

You dont place $700,000 in ANY appreciable context.
Okay, here's the context (again):

Consider an adult individual in the US, optionally with a spouse and a kid or two. Suppose this individual has an income, from some unspecified source, of $700K per year. Suppose further this individual is allowed to spend this income only on personal and family expenses.

Now, supposing that this individual spends this money "reasonably," by which I mean it's not used to purchase, for example, 30 tons of peaches (which the family could not possibly eat before they spoil).

That context should make the yearly income of $700K more than enough for just about anybody, correct?


You haven't demonstrated what 'most popular' means, and to what extent owning a Ford brand vehicle has to do with anything.

You haven't provided any data - actually...you claim 'sources'. (shrug).
Why are you still talking about the car statistics after I withdrew that point?

It's false moral ground - where you're standing. You're assuming what "right" looks like for people you don't know.
Are you saying that everybody is entitled to whatever arbitrary system of morality that they think is "right?" Scary idea...