Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Loose Is A Fucking Bitch Ass Punk

    Loose refuses to debate me in queer marriage thread

    Loose only has adhom

    Loose can't debate and he/she knows it

    Loose has no credibility left on board

    Loose is the most owned individual in the history of DP/USMB

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    eh em, not quite the words I would use, but nonetheless, the message is true.






    Both OCA and myself have challenged him and all he offers is insults. Maybe a quip or a faint thought here and there, but, when he or she gets cornered, runs and then starts a smear campaign about the other person's mental state/abilities/whatever.. in all kinds of posts/threads, but:

    never

    goes back to the debate.

    That should tell you something.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    LMFAO!

    Baron logs on and doesn't touch the queer marriage thread.

    RUN BABY RUN!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    497
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    So Tiger Woods and his caddy walk into a gay bar holding hands.........
    Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuc View Post
    So Tiger Woods and his caddy walk into a gay bar holding hands.........
    With or without Barry Bonds?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    College Park, GA
    Posts
    4,749
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1681

    Default

    It sounds like somebody needs a waaahburger and some frenchcries.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer
    Science wants to explain things and understand why they happen. Creationists want to use science to justify their own causes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    967
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13699

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    eh em, not quite the words I would use, but nonetheless, the message is true.






    Both OCA and myself have challenged him and all he offers is insults. Maybe a quip or a faint thought here and there, but, when he or she gets cornered, runs and then starts a smear campaign about the other person's mental state/abilities/whatever.. in all kinds of posts/threads, but:

    never

    goes back to the debate.

    That should tell you something.

    I know why OCA does it but you following him around like a pink poodle is pathetic

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roomy View Post
    I know why OCA does it but you following him around like a pink poodle is pathetic
    same issue

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    NO ONE wants to have an intelligent debate on gay marriage. They would rather sling insults at each other.
    I define a "queer" as someone who would rather fall back on antiquated religious beliefs rather than accept the finding of medical science. Because it is a pretty queer way of thinking.
    If you want to think of homosexuality as a genetic defect, go right ahead. Don't forget to kick over those wheelchairs on the way out.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I guess obsession is more than just a perfume.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    NO ONE wants to have an intelligent debate on gay marriage. They would rather sling insults at each other.
    I define a "queer" as someone who would rather fall back on antiquated religious beliefs rather than accept the finding of medical science. Because it is a pretty queer way of thinking.
    If you want to think of homosexuality as a genetic defect, go right ahead. Don't forget to kick over those wheelchairs on the way out.

    Where or what is this medical science on homosexuality gobbledlygook you speak of?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    My simplistic take on gay marriage.

    1. People of the same sex should be permitted to marry. No big deal.
    2. Religious ceremonies should be permitted.
    3. It's up to the religion itself (ie however it is organised) to decide if it wants to celebrate the marriage of same-sex couples.
    4. If this scares the crap out of you, get over it.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,214
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2938

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    My simplistic take on gay marriage.

    1. People of the same sex should be permitted to marry. No big deal.
    2. Religious ceremonies should be permitted.
    3. It's up to the religion itself (ie however it is organised) to decide if it wants to celebrate the marriage of same-sex couples.
    4. If this scares the crap out of you, get over it.
    My simplistic take on gay marriage.

    1. The government should have absolutely no jurisdiction over the religious ceremony known as marriage.
    2. Rights currently associated with marriage, such as inheritance rights and co-filing of income taxes, should be filed under another name, and shouldn't be limited to those who have sex with each other. Proof of cohabitation and shared assetts (such as a joint bank account) should be enough. A certificate of marriage from a recognized religion should also qualify.

    Gays get all the rights they want. No church has to worry about gay marriage mucking up their religious traditions. Sure, there'll be some rogue churches out there who give out weddings to gay couples, but for the most part, everybody's happy, and the government pulls out of yet another thing in which it doesn't belong.
    Last edited by Hobbit; 05-04-2007 at 09:30 AM.
    "Lighght"
    - This 'poem' was bought and paid for with $2,250 of YOUR money.

    Name one thing the government does better than the private sector and I'll show you something that requires the use of force to accomplish.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    What he said
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,214
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2938

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    What he said
    It's so simple, and I've been hard-pressed to find anybody who really disagrees with it. However, removing marriage from the powers of the government would, well, reduce the power of the government, so it's hard to find a politician willing to support it.
    "Lighght"
    - This 'poem' was bought and paid for with $2,250 of YOUR money.

    Name one thing the government does better than the private sector and I'll show you something that requires the use of force to accomplish.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums