Why are our conservative members unable to debate?

[diuretic]

Pfeeeesh..

Hey that hurt!

[glockmail]

I'm not particularly worried about your attempts at insult, I know it's The Cage which is why I asked the question here. But you see you didn't realise that you gave everyone reading the thread the opportunity to fully appreciate what I was getting at. So all that's left is to thank you for giving your evidence.

Wow. You are full of shit.

[diuretic]

Wow. You are full of shit.

Well dang if that didn't just take the cake, you're mighty smart, you do a lot of book learnin' so you can git to say them things like that? I'm a gonna be careful of you, you gonna outwit me every time on these here forums things.

[glockmail]

Well dang if that didn't just take the cake, you're mighty smart, you do a lot of book learnin' so you can git to say them things like that? I'm a gonna be careful of you, you gonna outwit me every time on these here forums things.

No doubt.

[Gunny]

As soon as you pin them down, which is very often, it turns to name-calling, stereotypical abuse, hysteria, crying, whining, complaining, gathering their little mates to come and help them deal with the big bad liberals. I know Bill O'Reilly is a blowhard fucking idiot who is fucked without the ability to shut the microphone down when he is getting owned - which is anytime a liberal takes him on - but why do his acolytes insist on reproducing the Flying Falafel's whiny behaviour here? Pussies, complete pussies. Whiny little momma's boys who as soon as they get taken apart by a liberal, immediately start calling foul.

Are they any use in a forum?

Has anyone pointed out to you that you have the description right, but you posted the wrong political idealism in your thread title?

IMO, you just described a WHOLE LOT of liberals -- moderates one and all -- just ask them.

[glockmail]

Was thinking the same thing.

[diuretic]

Has anyone pointed out to you that you have the description right, but you posted the wrong political idealism in your thread title?

No, that's because until now everyone who read it knew what it meant

IMO, you just described a WHOLE LOT of liberals -- moderates one and all -- just ask them.

Hah you only have to point to me shooting my motor mouth off there re the O'Reilly post. I should kick my own arse for that one but I know I'd be jumping the queue (line)

[stephanie]

No, that's because until now everyone who read it knew what it meant




Hah you only have to point to me shooting my motor mouth off there re the O'Reilly post. I should kick my own arse for that one but I know I'd be jumping the queue (line)

I want to see you kick your own arse...

[Gunny]

No, that's because until now everyone who read it knew what it meant




Hah you only have to point to me shooting my motor mouth off there re the O'Reilly post. I should kick my own arse for that one but I know I'd be jumping the queue (line)

So excepting yourself (I'll let you plead the 5th even if you're an Aussie), which liberal(s) is it that you believe puts any real effort into debate instead of spouting off talking points?

[diuretic]

Was thinking the same thing.

Just didn't wanna come out with it huh?

[Gunny]

I want to see you kick your own arse...

If he's as old as he says, you might not.

[diuretic]

If he's as old as he says, you might not.

Hey at least it's a big target!

[stephanie]

Hey at least it's a big target!

THAT big...

[diuretic]

THAT big...

Hugh1! I tell ya, Hugh1! Heck I have to send my arse an email to get it ready to move when I want to move my obese self off my specially reinforced and widened (as Toby puts it, "double-wide, double-wide) computer chair from NASA.

[glockmail]

Just didn't wanna come out with it huh?

I can't be shinin' all the sunshine, pal.