Originally Posted by
abso
what someone like you doesnt understand is that none is talking about waterboarding anymore, we are talking about the torture in general, should we agree with it or not, but you onle have two things to talk about, "Waterboarding" and "Terrorists are not covered in Geneva convention", those are the only two arguments that you had during your whole discussion, actually only one of them is valid, the one about Geneva convention, but about the waterboarding, you are very mistaken if you think that only three have been tortured that way, i dont really care if hundreds have been tourtered that way as long as they are all terrorists not innocents.
and about Geneva convention, it does not cover terrorists.
But CAT does cover terrorists, and USA is part of it, so stop speaking about international law, because in the field of law, all your arguments about torture will lose.
Dont try to legalise torture, if i were you, i would try to humanize it, not legalise it, i really hope that you can know the difference.
if you read my posts, you will see that i already said that things like CAT, limits the abilities of the security agencies all over the world to protect innocent people like us, and give more protection to stupid terrorists who kill us, so things like CAT should be cancelled from international law, but apparently, you still think that i am defending terrorists.