Hey, if we are going to post stupid polls with no meaning, might as well post them on both sides.
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/w...ona/index.html
Liberal moonbat
35 percent blame Palin for Tucson shooting
Hey, if we are going to post stupid polls with no meaning, might as well post them on both sides.
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/w...ona/index.html
Check Your Six
Awesome! From Salon, no less!
Got any other links from Common Dreams, Move On, HuffPo, etc.?
BTW, Gabby, have you been watching Sarah's show on TLC? Isn't she hot?
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
"I'm a heroin!"
Her hotness is her only good quality.Originally Posted by NightTrain
All conservatives are such from personal defects. They have been effeminated by position or nature, born halt and blind, through luxury of their parents, and can only, like invalids, act on the defensive.
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Check Your Six
You do realize that Gabby is going to deduct a few Lib Points for saying that, right?
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Ignored by the alt-right
Wow, a loaded question where 3 of the 4 options carry some blame on Palin?You're absolutely right, it has no meaning except that there are stupid people out there.
A map on Sarah Palin's website that marked 20 congressional districts, including the district represented by the congresswoman who was shot, with an image that looked like the crosshairs of a gun
Great deal 19% ... Moderate amount 16% ... Not much 15% ... Not at all 44%
Senior Member
Actually it was a Daily Kos/PPP poll and you (like the rest of the liberal media) are cherrypicking the numbers
snip
What Olbermann and Company did for the Palin option was add the "Great deal" responses to the "Moderate amount" ones to come up with 35 percent.
However, the "44 percent did not" comprised only those that said "Not at all." The "Not much" category was completely ignored.
As those familiar with poll reporting are well aware, if you're going to include "Moderate amount" with the "Yes" answers, it is customary to include the "Not much" replies with the "Nos".
What this means is Olbermann, if he was trying to be honest - I know that's a real stretch for this shill! - should have reported this datum, "35 percent thought Mrs. Palin’s infamous target map was a factor; 59 percent did not."
If he wasn't going to include the in-between responses, he should have said, "19 percent thought Mrs. Palin’s infamous target map was a factor; 44 percent did not."
I guess Olbermann didn't want his audience to know just how much respondents to this poll disagreed with him and the rest of the liberal media, especially those on MSNBC.
<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=hd6UaGeuSU" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=hd6UaGeuSU" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noe...#ixzz1BSvjxcf6
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
"I'm a heroin!"
Gabbs already said it was a stupid poll, Burger King Kid.
All conservatives are such from personal defects. They have been effeminated by position or nature, born halt and blind, through luxury of their parents, and can only, like invalids, act on the defensive.
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote