Nothing false about my assertions about you or otherwise. Mine are fully substantiated, unlike yours.
Yes, it ELIMINATES all other Fed taxes.
No, they provide a service and the Fairtax is a tax on the consumption of goods and services. It is paid by the consumer NOT the producer.
Yes, how many times do they file now? At least quarterly, sometimes more often depending on size iirc.
Yes, they do so NOW. Are you unaware of W-2s?
Yes, they are subject now. Are you unaware of the IRS?
Yes, they are subject now.
No, they don't pay taxes on their services provided and No, the "additional" tax is in lieu of all other Fed taxes. Asked and answered previously.
Possibly, let's get that changed. Work for the possible, not the impossible.
I suppose, taxes need to be collected. How many taxing authorities under your plan?
Yes, to ensure that NO ONE is subject to taxation at the poverty level. The public dole is a different subject, first things first.
No, it's progressive because they believe that the rich will automatically consume more than the poor thereby ensuring progressivity. Redistribution is NOT in the Republicans game plan.
No. And that is the perfect example of you spinning your "facts" away from the reality of the FairTax. You claim/imply that is an expansion of the tax base when in reality it is a shifting of taxation away from income and towards consumption. You ignore the embedding of the current tax code towards the transparency of the FairTax. You ignore the intrusiveness of the current code and the simplicity of the FairTax.
So try and acknowledge the benefits of what the FairTax does with some honesty. And like I said wishing for the impossible leaves us with the current system at the expense of what is possible, that is why I state that you "are working for the perpetuation of the current tax code" and I stand by it.