Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Treatment of stunted daughter broke law

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070509/...ttomUlNERvzwcF

    SEATTLE - A hospital acknowledged breaking state law when doctors performed a hysterectomy on a severely developmentally disabled girl whose growth was medically stunted to make caring for her easier for her parents.

    Sterilization surgeries must not be performed on children without a court order, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center acknowledged Tuesday after an investigation by Washington Protection and Advocacy System. The hospital agreed to appoint "someone with a disability rights perspective" to its ethics committee.

    The girl, identified only as Ashley, underwent surgery in 2004, when she was 6, to remove her uterus and breast tissue and was given growth-stunting hormones.

    The hospital's ethics committee supported the treatment but noted that court review would be required. A lawyer for the girl's parents disagreed, saying the state law did not apply in Ashley's case, and the hospital performed the procedures without court permission.

    "We deeply regret that a court order was not obtained and that an independent third party was not sought to represent Ashley. We take full responsibility for the miscommunication between the ethics committee and the treating physicians," said Dr. David Fisher, the hospital's medical director. "We have introduced new safeguards so that procedures requiring a court order will have one obtained before they begin."

    Ashley cannot sit up, walk or speak. Her parents say keeping her small will allow them to continue caring for her at home even when she is an adult. Her treatment also will allow her to avoid menstruation and related discomfort, as well as breast cancer, which runs in the family, her parents say.

    Some critics call the parents' actions perverse and akin to eugenics.

    On their blog Tuesday, Ashley's parents praised the vigilance of the advocacy group that investigated the case. But they also said they hoped requiring court orders in such cases would not create obstacles for parents seeking the best care for disabled children.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,214
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2939

    Default

    Heard about this on fark. I don't know how any sane person could see this as a good idea, but maybe that's just me.
    "Lighght"
    - This 'poem' was bought and paid for with $2,250 of YOUR money.

    Name one thing the government does better than the private sector and I'll show you something that requires the use of force to accomplish.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums