Group Pushes To ‘Let Bert And Ernie Get Married’ On Sesame Street

[Gunny]

They should allow the marriage and let as many kids as possible see it. Then have follow-ups showing them losing their hair and getting paler and thinner as aids sets in. Then have a final episode where they die of aids. Let the kids see the reality of embracing destructive and deviant behavior.

What's next? I suppose Laurel & Hardy and Abbot and Costello were gay and the 3 Stooges a gay menage a trois? Time to rewrite the history books. Again.

The very idea that some twisted minds would take something as innocent as a children's puppets to push their agenda and/or indoctrinate young children early with an aberrant lifestyle is despicable.

[revelarts]

And the downward march of western society takes another step to hell.
Maria and Big Bird, No Snuffaloagous and Maria to really get the feel of true bestiality. Sesame Street also Needs to demonstrate sexual activity and the proper method of Auto Asphyxia. So Kids don't accidentally kill themselves. I think The Count, Miss Piggy, Maria and ZOA should ALL get married. to show that POLYGAMY is Normal too. "1... 2... 3 WIVES!!! ah ha hah hahahah ".. Also Gun use, there should be some great songs about the proper use of Guns and Knifes . And what about Smokers, Smokers aren't represented. and HOW ABOUT CHRISTIANS, where are the HARD CORE CHRISTIAN MUPPETS? There are sites that MAKE FUN OF CHRISTIANS ans hurt young Christians feelings. ANd MUSLIMS WHAT ABOUT MUSLIM MUPPETS. "JIhad JiHAD Jing jing jing I like to sing Sing Sing ". WE NEED BALANCE!!! There's a LOT MORE GUN OWNERS, SMOKERS, CHRISTIANS and MUSLIMS than gays.

---

The Muppet show is INTENTIONALLY NEUTRAL on most Controversial Subjects.
Some things PARENTS need to teach CHILDREN at home.
And How about this, When gays start having more kids than Straits then they might have a say in what the majority teach them.

DEVIANT IDIOTS.

[KarlMarx]

I'd rather have my kids be respectful of the constitution, but that's just me. And your attempt at wit was funny, but then it always is.

Pray to your god at home. Don't waste my kid's time at school.

Why teach them to be respectful of the Constitution? Liberals like yourself will do anything but. You twist its meaning to suit your purposes. You find the right to kill babies in the punctuation marks of the document, the right for gays to marry in a clause that was supposed to grant protections of laws already on the books to people who weren't being granted them. Whenever a justice is nominated that believes in the doctrine of original intent, you have a stroke, and then there's that clause that you claim states a separation of church and state... when in fact... no such language is in the constitution.

[PostmodernProphet]

shucks, when I was little, Bert and Ernie still had separate beds.....

[KartRacerBoy]

Good , then teach them the Constitution, not your fucked up reading of it. You have freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion. IDIOT.


Teach your kid to take it in the ass at home, don't waste my kid's time at school.

Ask yiour wife what "caselaw" and "stare decisis" are. And listen to her, Mr. Klansman. For once.

8 years. Really? What a waste of time all those years of college were for you.

[KartRacerBoy]

Why teach them to be respectful of the Constitution? Liberals like yourself will do anything but. You twist its meaning to suit your purposes. You find the right to kill babies in the punctuation marks of the document, the right for gays to marry in a clause that was supposed to grant protections of laws already on the books to people who weren't being granted them. Whenever a justice is nominated that believes in the doctrine of original intent, you have a stroke, and then there's that clause that you claim states a separation of church and state... when in fact... no such language is in the constitution.

You're a constitutional scholar, too?

Not a well read one apparently. Check your Federalist Papers. Thomas Jefferson. Separation of Church and State. It's funny how you go all cafeteria plan on "original intent."

[ConHog]

You're a constitutional scholar, too?

Not a well read one apparently. Check your Federalist Papers. Thomas Jefferson. Separation of Church and State. It's funny how you go all cafeteria plan on "original intent."

Are the Federalist Papers part of the COTUS?

You get dumber every day. Oh, and as for your remark about me being a Klansman. I'm neither a Klucker, nor Scottish, so I have no idea what you're babbling about. Just more childish insults from you.


As for your further contention that you know the COTUS better than I do. I'll debate you one on one in ANY aspect of the COTUS any time.


I suspect we better do it soon though, because school is about to be in session, and I HOPE that means earlier bedtimes for you.

[KartRacerBoy]

Are the Federalist Papers part of the COTUS?

You get dumber every day. Oh, and as for your remark about me being a Klansman. I'm neither a Klucker, nor Scottish, so I have no idea what you're babbling about. Just more childish insults from you.


As for your further contention that you know the COTUS better than I do. I'll debate you one on one in ANY aspect of the COTUS any time.


I suspect we better do it soon though, because school is about to be in session, and I HOPE that means earlier bedtimes for you.

Jeez, you're stupid. I referred to the Federalist Papers becz that is a favorite tool of the original intent crowd. You're a historian? Really? And you studied the Constitution for 8 years? Really?

Again, cafeteria plan.

[Gunny]

Jeez, you're stupid. I referred to the Federalist Papers becz that is a favorite tool of the original intent crowd. You're a historian? Really? And you studied the Constitution for 8 years? Really?

Again, cafeteria plan.

I'd love to see one of you "original intent", "Destroy the Constitution at any cost" types explain to the FF's how you could pervert their words so badly you've turned any original and real intent into a suicide compact.

Then I REALLY love to see you explain to some of those fine, 18th century gentleman how it's okay to indoctrinate their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal behavior.

Odds are, you be shot before you got across the Mall.

[jimnyc]

If they want the kids to learn about queers, and to show them getting married, will they also teach them that the 2 are engaging in anal sex as part of their deviant lifestyle perversions? If you want to be honest with the kids, don't be hiding the truth from them.

[KartRacerBoy]

I'd love to see one of you "original intent", "Destroy the Constitution at any cost" types explain to the FF's how you could pervert their words so badly you've turned any original and real intent into a suicide compact.

Then I REALLY love to see you explain to some of those fine, 18th century gentleman how it's okay to indoctrinate their children that homosexuality is perfectly normal behavior.

Odds are, you be shot before you got across the Mall.

Wouldn't it be great if society never changed and we all still had to use outhouses since plumbing is change and change is bad?

As to the stupidity of original intent, whose intent are we talking about anyway? All of the writers of COTUS? Just one of them (the one you happen to agree with)? Or do look to the ratifiers of COTUS? Which ratifiers since different delegates had different interpretations of different clauses?

Try reading Pauline Maier's "Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, `1787-1788."

[KartRacerBoy]

If they want the kids to learn about queers, and to show them getting married, will they also teach them that the 2 are engaging in anal sex as part of their deviant lifestyle perversions? If you want to be honest with the kids, don't be hiding the truth from them.

And let's have them portray heterosexual sex, too. But not fellatio or cunniligus becz that's sodomy and illegal in some states. Hope you dont practice those deviant acts, you pervert.

[jimnyc]

And let's have them portray heterosexual sex, too. But not fellatio or cunniligus becz that's sodomy and illegal in some states. Hope you dont practice those deviant acts, you pervert.

I don't perform "illegal" acts, and will readily admit that I do engage in risky behavior from time to time. But I don't want extra rights as a result, I don't run around half naked in parades to tell everyone about it, and I don't scream from the rooftops to be accepted by society. Oh, and my activities don't nearly send as many people to doctors, hospitals and graves as much as caused by queers.

[KartRacerBoy]

I don't perform "illegal" acts, and will readily admit that I do engage in risky behavior from time to time.

So you admit you commit sodomy, you criminal? So your deviant sexual acts are ok but homosexual acts are bad? What's the difference? Both are deviant. Do you just base your judgment on your "ick" factor? On the bible (IIRC, sodomy is a sin in any form)?

[jimnyc]

So you admit you commit sodomy, you criminal? So your deviant sexual acts are ok but homosexual acts are bad? What's the difference? Both are deviant. Do you just base your judgment on your "ick" factor? On the bible (IIRC, sodomy is a sin in any form)?

Did you read what I wrote? First off, I commit no crimes, that I assure you, but what goes on in my bedroom is none of your business. But I admitted that I have engaged in what some would call deviant behavior. But it's not considered to be activities with health risks, I don't demand rights because I've done so, I don't demand society to accept me, I don't bring my sex to the public...

Back to the subject at hand... I think they should have Bert and Ernie create a makeshift NYC gay parade. Bert can wear his chaps while Ernie wears a dress. "I'm here, I'm Queer..." Yup, good 'ol times for the kids!