Queer Marriage II

[jimnyc]

No, but people have been nailed for restarting closed threads, regardless of the subject matter..

Only when they are closed because of personal vendettas or complaints about board policy and/or staff. Even so, he didn't just restart it, he asked for permission first, so it's hardly the same.

I'm well aware he said you could restart it. What I don't understand is why, but I've since found out things can be pretty subjective, so..whatever. While it lowers my belief in "fairness", it ain't my board. Have at it.

Why do you insist on making an issue of this? What is there not fair about me allowing someone to start a new thread? The old one went downhill, and I stated it could be restarted so long as it remains civil and mature. Not sure what you think I'm being unfair about. I think saying "no" to the request to try again would have been unfair.

[glockmail]

.....
Is it natural to feel sexually attracted to other people? Regardless of whom it is? Yes.

Is it natural to want to steal money?

[shattered]

Only when they are closed because of personal vendettas or complaints about board policy and/or staff. Even so, he didn't just restart it, he asked for permission first, so it's hardly the same.



Why do you insist on making an issue of this? What is there not fair about me allowing someone to start a new thread? The old one went downhill, and I stated it could be restarted so long as it remains civil and mature. Not sure what you think I'm being unfair about. I think saying "no" to the request to try again would have been unfair.

I'm not going to discuss this publically with you, since I know what comes next if that happens.

[nevadamedic]

Why does is matter if the old one got deleted? Obviously they aer allowing this one so why bring up the past, why not drop it and get back on topic? Im sure the Mod's have better things to do with their time then have to explain their actions on here, just a thought.

[jimnyc]

I'm not going to discuss this publically with you, since I know what comes next if that happens.

Yet you'll come into multiple threads and complain. How about we just stop complaining then?

[shattered]

Yet you'll come into multiple threads and complain. How about we just stop complaining then?

Where did I come in to multiple threads and complain? Show me.

[jimnyc]

Where did I come in to multiple threads and complain? Show me.

Actually one thread, just thought it was 2 since it was moved. But you first protested OCA opening this thread in the beginning, and here you are again claiming unfairness about this thread a day later.

I'm just unsure as to why this subject being re-opened and discussed bothers you to the point that you need to call my fairness into question.

[shattered]

Actually one thread, just thought it was 2 since it was moved. But you first protested OCA opening this thread in the beginning, and here you are again claiming unfairness about this thread a day later.

I'm just unsure as to why this subject being re-opened and discussed bothers you to the point that you need to call my fairness into question.

1) I merely answered posts referenced to me from both you and OCA. My comment to Roomy indicating "That's the way it used to be." was just that. A comment indicating that's the way it used to be.

2) You have a PM. I'm not stupid enough to hash this out here.

[lily]

Well, now........it would seem that Shattered is allowed to discuss board policy, but others get banned.

[jimnyc]

You can all thank Shattered and Lily for this thread being shut down. I thought I made myself clear but apparently not.

And if OCA wishes to start ANOTHER thread about this subject, he is free too, just letting that known in advance. And if anyone chooses to complain about the board in that thread instead of discussing the subject, then they too can join the others that didn't listen to my warnings.