Results 1 to 15 of 20

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    3,000
    Thanks (Given)
    363
    Thanks (Received)
    1000
    Likes (Given)
    80
    Likes (Received)
    569
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5913561

    Default

    Another class of particles, tachyons, have been postulated. Those particles have imaginary mass (not kidding), meaning that they cannot travel *slower* than the speed of light... the math is kind of spacy, just google imaginary numbers and you'll see what I mean....

    maybe nuetrinos turn into tachyons under certain conditions. Then the tachyons are travelling near the speed of light but slightly faster then turn back into nuetrinos without the transition being detected... making it appear as if the nuetrinos are travelling slightly faster than the speed of light....
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    San Dimas, California
    Posts
    2,025
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    236
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    703545

    Default

    If neutrinos have mass and are travelling faster than light, we've got all kinds of problems.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    3,000
    Thanks (Given)
    363
    Thanks (Received)
    1000
    Likes (Given)
    80
    Likes (Received)
    569
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5913561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderknuckles View Post
    If neutrinos have mass and are travelling faster than light, we've got all kinds of problems.
    I wasn't suggesting that neutrinos are travelling faster than light. It is possible that they are temporarily converted to tachyons then almost immediately converted back to nuetrinos. Of course, that theory has problems. First there is the conservation of mass principal... how do you convert something with little or no mass into something that has imaginary mass and still conserve mass? The answer may be something like this... nuetrinos' mass is a complex number (having both real and imaginary components).... by some mechanism... the real component is transformed into the imaginary component for a slight instant.... the mass of the particle can be expressed as

    square root of (a**2 + i*b**2)... where a is the real component of the mass and b is the imaginary component of the mass and i is the square root of -1....

    by some mechanism the entire mass is converted into imaginary mass equal to i * square root (a**2 + b**2).... that may take care of the conservation of mass problem....
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KarlMarx View Post
    I wasn't suggesting that neutrinos are travelling faster than light. It is possible that they are temporarily converted to tachyons then almost immediately converted back to nuetrinos. Of course, that theory has problems. First there is the conservation of mass principal... how do you convert something with little or no mass into something that has imaginary mass and still conserve mass? The answer may be something like this... nuetrinos' mass is a complex number (having both real and imaginary components).... by some mechanism... the real component is transformed into the imaginary component for a slight instant.... the mass of the particle can be expressed as

    square root of (a**2 + i*b**2)... where a is the real component of the mass and b is the imaginary component of the mass and i is the square root of -1....

    by some mechanism the entire mass is converted into imaginary mass equal to i * square root (a**2 + b**2).... that may take care of the conservation of mass problem....
    Even if that happens, the recomposition of mass means that the information (which is the mass) is traveling at speeds faster than light
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    3,000
    Thanks (Given)
    363
    Thanks (Received)
    1000
    Likes (Given)
    80
    Likes (Received)
    569
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5913561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    Even if that happens, the recomposition of mass means that the information (which is the mass) is traveling at speeds faster than light
    Well, it was worth a try
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    Something i don;t quite understand about this.

    If these particles are traveling faster than light, does that not mean that by definition they are traveling back in time?

    and thus arriving sixty billionths of a second before they left the original starting chamber?
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    3,000
    Thanks (Given)
    363
    Thanks (Received)
    1000
    Likes (Given)
    80
    Likes (Received)
    569
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5913561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    Something i don;t quite understand about this.

    If these particles are traveling faster than light, does that not mean that by definition they are traveling back in time?

    and thus arriving sixty billionths of a second before they left the original starting chamber?
    at speeds faster than light, time becomes imaginary, not negative.... I don't know what that the implications of imaginary time are...
    How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KarlMarx View Post
    Well, it was worth a try
    Well given the wiriness of quantum mechanics you may be right, and wrong, and both lol.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums