Page 18 of 18 FirstFirst ... 8161718
Results 256 to 265 of 265
  1. #256
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315367

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Read what you just wrote and see how that differs from what I wrote. The above post of yours was the first mention of going back to court. I was very clear, if a parent becomes unemployed they CAN go back to family court and get their child support reduced. To be honest I don't know if it would be stopped completely if a person had no income. I doubt it.

    However, a person can't just say "fuck it, I aint gotta job, I aint paying" and stop paying. The debt will simply accrue. And that is how you first made it sound you were going about things. You said NOTHING about getting an adjustment from the courts.
    and you made an assumption that there already was an order in place. Ya know, everey divorce has a start when there is no order yet.
    You said that no matter what, some amount would be ordered to be paid, and I was showing the scenario whereas one wasnt making any money whatsover. Would they still be ordered to pay something?
    I DONT CLAIM TO KN0OW ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN NATURE
    N
    OIR DO I KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING

  2. #257
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,505
    Thanks (Given)
    23714
    Thanks (Received)
    17273
    Likes (Given)
    9550
    Likes (Received)
    6006
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475521

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    and you made an assumption that there already was an order in place. Ya know, everey divorce has a start when there is no order yet.
    You said that no matter what, some amount would be ordered to be paid, and I was showing the scenario whereas one wasnt making any money whatsover. Would they still be ordered to pay something?
    Both of you! I'm flying by the seat of my pants here, but will use my own anecdote knowledge here. My ex's income suddenly went up fourfold within two weeks of getting the divorce.

    Of course it was an utter surprise to him, no waiting for the court for certain. Did i take him back to court? No. Why? It would have made a bad situation worse.

    OTOH, seems there are a lot of men, probably women too that choose to quit their jobs rather than pay child support. Seems to me that if they can prove that they were fired or laid off, they should ask for a reduction. If however they just choose not to work? Jail or garnishing of any income at all.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  3. #258
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Both of you! I'm flying by the seat of my pants here, but will use my own anecdote knowledge here. My ex's income suddenly went up fourfold within two weeks of getting the divorce.

    Of course it was an utter surprise to him, no waiting for the court for certain. Did i take him back to court? No. Why? It would have made a bad situation worse.

    OTOH, seems there are a lot of men, probably women too that choose to quit their jobs rather than pay child support. Seems to me that if they can prove that they were fired or laid off, they should ask for a reduction. If however they just choose not to work? Jail or garnishing of any income at all.
    I think you would be SHOCKED to find out how many non custodial parents would rather start a new job every 6 months or so rather than paying child support. It's pathetic.

  4. #259
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,505
    Thanks (Given)
    23714
    Thanks (Received)
    17273
    Likes (Given)
    9550
    Likes (Received)
    6006
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475521

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    I think you would be SHOCKED to find out how many non custodial parents would rather start a new job every 6 months or so rather than paying child support. It's pathetic.
    Yeah, I do know. Neither my lawyer or myself were surprised by his promotion, indeed we figured the actual change happened much earlier, but officially posted by Crain's Chicago came literally days after the divorce was granted.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  5. #260
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Yeah, I do know. Neither my lawyer or myself were surprised by his promotion, indeed we figured the actual change happened much earlier, but officially posted by Crain's Chicago came literally days after the divorce was granted.

    Yeah, but good luck proving that. That's one thing that has always bothered me about the child support. They have built in delays for this or that. well that just basically gives the non custodial parent fair warning that CSE is onto them

    "dear sir, in 60 days we will start garnishing your wages" really means "dear dirtbag you have 50 days to find a new job" because the process starts anew every time a new employer is tracked down.

  6. #261
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,811
    Thanks (Given)
    34243
    Thanks (Received)
    26347
    Likes (Given)
    2312
    Likes (Received)
    9910
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    so you are saying , if no fault of their own, they are making $0 for a stretch of time, they are still required to pay CS?

    again, citation?
    The "citation" is that is EXACTLY how the judge ruled in my ex-SIL's case. The responsibility to the child does not go away. He went back and got the monthly amount temporarily lowered; however, he STILL in the end has to pay the total amount.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  7. #262
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315367

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    The "citation" is that is EXACTLY how the judge ruled in my ex-SIL's case. The responsibility to the child does not go away. He went back and got the monthly amount temporarily lowered; however, he STILL in the end has to pay the total amount.
    AL

    the point Iim trying to make is this.
    conman said that the party responsable for CS, will ALWAYS have to pay something, but Im saying there are lots of circumstances in which they wont be responsable.
    what if the guy got in an accident, and
    cant work
    or, is homeless

    been committed to a psychiatric facility
    is in prison
    I DONT CLAIM TO KN0OW ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN NATURE
    N
    OIR DO I KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING

  8. #263
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    AL

    the point Iim trying to make is this.
    conman said that the party responsable for CS, will ALWAYS have to pay something, but Im saying there are lots of circumstances in which they wont be responsable.
    what if the guy got in an accident, and
    cant work
    or, is homeless

    been committed to a psychiatric facility
    is in prison
    and in ALL of those cases if there is an outstanding child support order the non custodial will owe. Even if they can't pay, the amount accrues (that means adds up)

    Even if there is no child support order, do you realize the custodial parent can later go to court and get a court order that retroactively applies CS and the non custodial will have to pay it.

  9. #264
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GREATEST CITY ON EARTH, SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    3,007
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    315367

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    and in ALL of those cases if there is an outstanding child support order the non custodial will owe. Even if they can't pay, the amount accrues (that means adds up).
    did YOU not read the part that says there is no current order, and retro pay isnt asked. Not to mention, Im not talking about arrearages, Im talking about the amount the judge will order.

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Even if there is no child support order, do you realize the custodial parent can later go to court and get a court order that retroactively applies CS and the non custodial will have to pay it.
    Usually the retro pay ordered will only go back to the date of the current filing for the CS.

    SO, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN,
    CAN A judge order no payments required under any circums.tances?

    still waiting for that citation
    I DONT CLAIM TO KN0OW ANYTHING ABOUT HUMAN NATURE
    N
    OIR DO I KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING

  10. #265
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LuvRPgrl View Post
    did YOU not read the part that says there is no current order, and retro pay isnt asked. Not to mention, Im not talking about arrearages, Im talking about the amount the judge will order.



    Usually the retro pay ordered will only go back to the date of the current filing for the CS.

    SO, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN,
    CAN A judge order no payments required under any circums.tances?

    still waiting for that citation
    Asked and answered sir. First of all your original argument NEVER mentioned a court order. Second of all , I said I don't know if they would order zero child support do under any circumstances, but I doubt it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums