JP Cusick and Child Support

[jimnyc]

I simply can not continue on this forum as I simply can not be associated with the pornography and filth on this forum.

Even if I were not a candidate for political office then I would still be personally ashamed of participating along with such severe profanity going on so I have to remove myself.

This is the first time for me that I ever experienced such a scenario so this solution is the best response to it that I can figure out to exit here and still stand my ground as to the subject given, as I am not leaving the thread subject and just leaving the dirty talk.

I have quoted your postings onto my own forum and it is linked here = "red states rule - Debate Policy.

So anyone can respond or reply or whatever one wants to do on that forum, as anyone can post there either anonymously without registering or by registering then anyone can get email notifications and more.

Of course on that smaller forum people can talk about most anything but any dirty words or pornographic insinuations will be (censored).

Peace.

Pornography? LOL

JP, you're just mad because people are calling you out to answer questions about YOUR OWN wrongdoings. Tough shit. And we don't allow links to other forums here. So it would be much easier if you hate it here so much, if you quietly went away and go fuck yourself.

[ConHog]

Pornography? LOL

JP, you're just mad because people are calling you out to answer questions about YOUR OWN wrongdoings. Tough shit. And we don't allow links to other forums here. So it would be much easier if you hate it here so much, if you quietly went away and go fuck yourself.

Damn, I was searching , thoguht maybe I missed the boat on some good porn.


Clearly you are right here. JP got his little feelers hurt that we don't like deadbeat parents who tear up public property because they are mad at their ex and so he's taking his ball and running away.

His little bullshit about "I am above this board" is clearly just that. Bullshit; because clearly JP is lower than whale shit.

[LuvRPgrl]

But, but, but he's a repub. Are you people willingly violating the repub 11th commandment? Never speak poorly of a fellow repub?

funny, hahahhaha
get it right doc, he has a big D next to his name.

[red states rule]

I simply can not continue on this forum as I simply can not be associated with the pornography and filth on this forum.

Even if I were not a candidate for political office then I would still be personally ashamed of participating along with such severe profanity going on so I have to remove myself.

This is the first time for me that I ever experienced such a scenario so this solution is the best response to it that I can figure out to exit here and still stand my ground as to the subject given, as I am not leaving the thread subject and just leaving the dirty talk.

I have quoted your postings onto my own forum and it is linked here = "red states rule".

So anyone can respond or reply or whatever one wants to do on that forum, as anyone can post there either anonymously without registering or by registering then anyone can get email notifications and more.

Of course on that smaller forum people can talk about most anything but any dirty words or pornographic insinuations will be (censored).

Peace.

Where did I use any "dirty" words? I asked you direct questions on two issues pertaining to MD

The truth is, you have a problem with people pushing back and calling you on your liberal views, and exposing what you wrote on other boards

Your like another poster who is now gone, He also was unable to deal what he wrote on other boards and took a powder as well

And you expect people to take you as a serious candidate?

[ConHog]

What made JP believe that anyone here was going to be sympathetic to his refusal to help financially support his children?

[ConHog]

Edited by Abbey

Oh, but he said his ex had plenty of money and so could afford to raise the kids without his help..

Truth be told I bet if we found his ex wife and children and asked them about him they would each and everyone tell us that they don't want him OR his money involved in their lives. He came across as a real prick.

[Kathianne]

Oh, but he said his ex had plenty of money and so could afford to raise the kids without his help..

Truth be told I bet if we found his ex wife and children and asked them about him they would each and everyone tell us that they don't want him OR his money involved in their lives. He came across as a real prick.

His ex wife died, leaving their son with her husband, the boy's step father. When good ole' JP showed up, found he'd have to pay the support to the step father. He really didn't like that.

Now I'm uncertain what happened, whether the court gave any visitation or not; my guess is his lack of remorse regarding defacing public property may have brought some question to the court's mind regarding his mental stability.

[Jess]

Oh, but he said his ex had plenty of money and so could afford to raise the kids without his help..

Truth be told I bet if we found his ex wife and children and asked them about him they would each and everyone tell us that they don't want him OR his money involved in their lives. He came across as a real prick.

Around here, the court doesn't care whether the custodial parent can raise the kids without the noncustodial parent's help or not.

The noncustodial parent has a responsibility to do their share in providing for and raising the children and that is based on their income for the most part. That is what resources the children would have access to had the couple not split.

[ConHog]

Around here, the court doesn't care whether the custodial parent can raise the kids without the noncustodial parent's help or not.

The noncustodial parent has a responsibility to do their share in providing for and raising the children and that is based on their income for the most part. That is what resources the children would have access to had the couple not split.

That's federal law. Now each state IS left to their own devices to figure out how much each parent should pay. But FEDERAL law is that each parent is financially responsible for helping raise their children regardless of the financial situation of the other parent.

[LuvRPgrl]

That's federal law. Now each state IS left to their own devices to figure out how much each parent should pay. But FEDERAL law is that each parent is financially responsible for helping raise their children regardless of the financial situation of the other parent.

if non custodial is unemployed, they still have to pay?

care to cite the law?

[ConHog]

if non custodial is unemployed, they still have to pay?

care to cite the law?

If non custodial is unemployed the child support obligation doesn't go away, it is merely added to the ledger until some point where it can be collected.

[LuvRPgrl]

If non custodial is unemployed the child support obligation doesn't go away, it is merely added to the ledger until some point where it can be collected.

so you are saying , if no fault of their own, they are making $0 for a stretch of time, they are still required to pay CS?

again, citation?

[ConHog]

so you are saying , if no fault of their own, they are making $0 for a stretch of time, they are still required to pay CS?

again, citation?

Yes, I am saying that absent a court order temporarily lowering child support payments that the amount owed by order accrues if the payments aren't made. Regardless of employment status.

[LuvRPgrl]

That's federal law. Now each state IS left to their own devices to figure out how much each should pay. But FEDERAL law is that each parent is financially responsible for helping raise their children regardless of the financial situation of the other parent.

.

Ok, what you said above is all inclusive.At all times, under all circumstances.


If one of them is unemployed, and they go back to court to have the support amended, do they have to pay any support at all if they do in fact have any income whatsoever.

still waiting on the federal citation

[ConHog]

.

Ok, what you said above is all inclusive.At all times, under all circumstances.


If one of them is unemployed, and they go back to court to have the support amended, do they have to pay any support at all if they do in fact have any income whatsoever.

still waiting on the federal citation

Read what you just wrote and see how that differs from what I wrote. The above post of yours was the first mention of going back to court. I was very clear, if a parent becomes unemployed they CAN go back to family court and get their child support reduced. To be honest I don't know if it would be stopped completely if a person had no income. I doubt it.

However, a person can't just say "fuck it, I aint gotta job, I aint paying" and stop paying. The debt will simply accrue. And that is how you first made it sound you were going about things. You said NOTHING about getting an adjustment from the courts.