Climategate II Hide the Decline

[red states rule]

So the global warming kooks hid data that went against their "research" and we have snow in late October

Another nail in the coffin of global wamring

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague


snip

But today The Mail on Sunday can reveal that a leading member of Prof Muller’s team has accused him of trying to mislead the public by hiding the fact that BEST’s research shows global warming has stopped.

Prof Judith Curry, who chairs the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at America’s prestigious Georgia Institute of Technology, said that Prof Muller’s claim that he has proven global warming sceptics wrong was also a ‘huge mistake’, with no scientific basis.

Prof Curry is a distinguished climate researcher with more than 30 years experience and the second named co-author of the BEST project’s four research papers.

Her comments, in an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, seem certain to ignite a furious academic row. She said this affair had to be compared to the notorious ‘Climategate’ scandal two years ago.

Like the scientists exposed then by leaked emails from East Anglia University’s Climatic Research Unit, her colleagues from the BEST project seem to be trying to ‘hide the decline’ in rates of global warming.

In fact, Prof Curry said, the project’s research data show there has been no increase in world temperatures since the end of the Nineties – a fact confirmed by a new analysis that The Mail on Sunday has obtained.

‘There is no scientific basis for saying that warming hasn’t stopped,’ she said. ‘To say that there is detracts from the credibility of the data, which is very unfortunate.’

However, Prof Muller denied warming was at a standstill.

‘We see no evidence of it [global warming] having slowed down,’ he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. There was, he added, ‘no levelling off’.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz1cMLDycqi

[Kathianne]

I don't think this comes close to what Climategate was-a deliberate attempt to 'fix the data' to fit the theory.

This seems to be a one misleading, not false graphic included within the report. With the exception seems the study was transparent and provided the information for checking. That's all that's been ask of reasonable folks.

[revelarts]

crazy conspiracy theorist. 1000's of people would have to involved.
just trust the scientist and the gov't will yeah RED.

[red states rule]

I don't think this comes close to what Climategate was-a deliberate attempt to 'fix the data' to fit the theory.

This seems to be a one misleading, not false graphic included within the report. With the exception seems the study was transparent and provided the information for checking. That's all that's been ask of reasonable folks.

Why would they need proof Kat? According to Al Gore they have a consensus and that is more than enough to spend trillions on fighting global warming

and Al's companies are more than willing to take the money