Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475725

    Default NRA official: Obama wants to outlaw guns in 2nd term

    Will be interesting to see if this is a "conspiracy" or not...

    A top official with the National Rifle Association said Friday that President Obama will move to "destroy" gun rights and "erase" the Second Amendment if he is re-elected in November.

    While delivering one of the liveliest and best-received speeches at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre said the president's low-key approach to gun rights during his first term was "a "conspiracy to ensure re-election by lulling gun owners to sleep."

    "All that first term, lip service to gun owners is just part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment during his second term," he said.

    "We see the president's strategy crystal clear: Get re-elected and, with no more elections to worry about, get busy dismantling and destroying our firearms' freedom, erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights and excise it from the U.S. Constitution."

    Mr. LaPierre said the president's two Supreme Court appointees — Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan— are "two of the most rabid anti-gun justices in history." He also accused Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of being a foe of gun rights.

    And with the possibility of two or more Supreme Court justice positions opening during the next four years, the NRA official warned that gun ownership would be in jeopardy if Mr. Obama stays in office.

    "If we get one more like those three, the Second Amendment is finished," he said. "It'll be the end of our freedom forever."
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...guns-2nd-term/
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    in my own little world
    Posts
    2,074
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    419240

    Default

    Argue for your limitations, and sure enough, they're yours.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    Will be interesting to see if this is a "conspiracy" or not...



    http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/...guns-2nd-term/
    Setting aside whether he even wants to repeal the second amendment. Does anyo e believe he could get that done? I dont believe hrd ever get the votes to accomplish it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,942
    Thanks (Given)
    34353
    Thanks (Received)
    26450
    Likes (Given)
    2375
    Likes (Received)
    9985
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Setting aside whether he even wants to repeal the second amendment. Does anyo e believe he could get that done? I dont believe hrd ever get the votes to accomplish it.
    He doesn't have to. Since when has the Constitution gotten in his way? All he's got to do is come with some BS like CLinton's "Brady Bill" and tie it to a package the Republicans want and guess what?

    As far as your first question goes, gun control was part of his agenda for this year. He just didn't get around to it. Now he'll hold off until after the election.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    He doesn't have to. Since when has the Constitution gotten in his way? All he's got to do is come with some BS like CLinton's "Brady Bill" and tie it to a package the Republicans want and guess what?

    As far as your first question goes, gun control was part of his agenda for this year. He just didn't get around to it. Now he'll hold off until after the election.


    I'm not talking about getting a few ancillary laws passed. I'm talking about a blanket repeal of the 2nd amendment, it will NEVER happen.

    And I didn't have a first question, in fact I agree it is likely Obama would love to see the second amendment repealed, I just happen to believe he knows that it will NEVER happen and so won't even try.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    837
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    140102

    Default

    Got a buddy here in Lubbock that is a serious gun guy. He believes that the Chicago Mob will not outlaw guns. He believes they will restrict, regulate, and license out the ass all the stuff related to guns. He says that 9mm pistol ammo for example is prone to availability issues and price fluctuations that only a wall streeter would approve of. He contends that actually making an AR or AK clone illegal or a ban on handguns would only piss off enough people to cause a backlash. Instead his theory is that by piling on one "reasonable" regulation (like max capacity magazines) on top of another, firearms will become an exception. He now reloads his own and allegedly buys powder and other supplies under a variety of "covers".

    Sounds plausible to me.

    What do y'all think?
    I'm Phil -- 40 something heterosexual white male, fairly self sufficient, great with my kids, wed 29 years to the same woman, and I firmly believe that ones actions have logical consequences. How much more out the box can you get nowadays? -- MSgt of Marines (ret)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pegwinn View Post
    Got a buddy here in Lubbock that is a serious gun guy. He believes that the Chicago Mob will not outlaw guns. He believes they will restrict, regulate, and license out the ass all the stuff related to guns. He says that 9mm pistol ammo for example is prone to availability issues and price fluctuations that only a wall streeter would approve of. He contends that actually making an AR or AK clone illegal or a ban on handguns would only piss off enough people to cause a backlash. Instead his theory is that by piling on one "reasonable" regulation (like max capacity magazines) on top of another, firearms will become an exception. He now reloads his own and allegedly buys powder and other supplies under a variety of "covers".

    Sounds plausible to me.

    What do y'all think?
    ''

    A far more plausible scenario. Really no different than what they are doing with smokes. It's not illegal to smoke, but the cost and limits placed on where you can and such certainly achieve a similar result.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums