Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 121 to 129 of 129
  1. #121
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DragonStryk72 View Post
    Oh no, you have to flag it as sarcasm, Aeryn. She never gets sarcasm on here otherwise.
    Hell man, she can't correctly interpret ANY post, let alone one posted in sarcasm.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5360
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wind Song View Post
    I point out that the Catholic Church considers procreation the main reason for a married couple to have sex, and further considers sex without the motivation to conceive to be perverse.
    So what? If you don't agree with them, then don't associate with them. Why must you always think that your way is better. Obviously, there are millions, upon millions of people who disagree with your premise.


    Consider the theme of the OP. Women have a duty to reproduce. According to Catholic doctrine, married women and men have a duty to reproduce. Do you think the Catholic Church tears down the male role?

    Stay on topic please.
    Once again, why do you care what the Catholic Church preaches? You have said that you are a Buddhist. Go practice Buddhism and leave the Catholics alone.

    Personally, I'm not religious because I don't like being told how to live my life, but I don't attack other's religion.
    Last edited by SassyLady; 05-28-2012 at 05:04 AM.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5360
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wind Song View Post
    Women have a duty to reproduce is the topic. I argue they don't. The RCC says otherwise.
    Topic: women have a duty to reproduce.

    RCC: men and women have a duty to reproduce.

    WS: women do not have a duty to reproduce.



    End of story. Nothing left to debate. People either disagree with you or agree with you.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5360
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wind Song View Post
    ]
    The RCC considers it the duty of married men and women to procreate.
    I believe it is a privilege to procreate. I created one of the most stunningly beautiful and intelligent women I know. She has created three brilliant children that might one day grow up and be the leader of the free world, or a scientist that discovers another Earth-like planet and how to get there.

    Why is it so wrong, WS, to believe having children is good for mankind? You reduce everything to your own little worldview without thinking of the big picture. Survival of mankind hinges upon procreating. If there is one religion, the RCC, that considers it a duty and not a privilege, then I'm OK with it.
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5360
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wind Song View Post
    "people like WS". What kind of people would those be?

    I appreciate mothers completely. All beings have once been our kind mothers.

    I am raising a question about whether it is the duty of a woman to have children.
    Well, if it is not the duty of a woman, then who's duty is it? Build them in a lab?
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    over here
    Posts
    13,378
    Thanks (Given)
    5578
    Thanks (Received)
    6629
    Likes (Given)
    5360
    Likes (Received)
    3975
    Piss Off (Given)
    35
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17558169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wind Song View Post
    One of the European Bishops was worried that Europe would become predominantly Muslim populated. He called for Christians to have more children. That sounds like having children is a national or regional duty.
    My husband felt it was his duty to protect and serve his country by being willing to give his life. I would think that a woman having a baby is along the same lines. Do you not think you have a duty to continue mankind or to help serve your country is asked?
    If the freedom of speech is taken away
    then dumb and silent we may be led,
    like sheep to the slaughter.


    George Washington (1732-1799) First President of the USA.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,586
    Thanks (Given)
    23818
    Thanks (Received)
    17361
    Likes (Given)
    9609
    Likes (Received)
    6071
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475522

    Default

    If there was a qualifier that "healthy women, in relationships that would be mutually beneficial to child and relationship, should feel a duty to procreate" I'm with that sentiment.

    I don't think that folks that take can't take care of themselves should have children. Obviously that includes most baby mommas. It also includes those that would abuse their children. Sadly it includes those capable in income, education; but too selfish to want to share. It's their right to choose not to, but yes, the country and themselves are worse off for it.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  8. #128
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Holy hell! Mother of all people and things fucked up!

    Wind Song, honey, not sure if you are still posting because from reading you've quit the board and kept posting more times than Wilt Chamberlain had girlfriends.....................YOU ARE FUCKED UP IN THE HEAD! It all stems from your lifestyle choice, until you get that cleared up and fixed you will never be content in your life, you will always have issues with everything because you are not right in your soul.

    Oh and BTW...God bless the people of the great state of North Carolina, another one for the correct side.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475257

    Default

    I will say that when it comes to practicing on the procreation part women are the only option.
    No union of two men or two women ever produced a baby. Now my wife and I have a five year old son and we do not intend to have any more children but we certainly arent going to stop "practicing"...
    They say practice makes perfect and I'm going for perfection!---Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums