Page 20 of 30 FirstFirst ... 101819202122 ... LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 441

Thread: Uh Oh

  1. #286
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nell's Room View Post
    Apples and oranges. You are better than that.
    No he's not...really.
    I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. -- Susan B. Anthony


  2. #287
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westchester, New York
    Posts
    67,823
    Thanks (Given)
    7315
    Thanks (Received)
    34146
    Likes (Given)
    7051
    Likes (Received)
    7758
    Piss Off (Given)
    14
    Piss Off (Received)
    19
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475725

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    No he's not...really.
    Like I tell everyone else, he's a scorpion. As soon as you reach your hand out and trust the fucker, he'll sting you in a NY minute and let you drown like the frog!
    “You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colin." Need I say more?” - Chris Rock

  3. #288
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Myself I believe the bisexual people who switch back and forth like you or I would change socks destroys the entire "they were born that way" argument. However, it is irrelevant to THIS discussion. You have a right to do such things if you so choose.
    Why? If some folks are attracted to the same gender and some(most) are attracted to the opposite, I see no reason why it's not logical that there are some who are attracted to both. It in no way establishes that those who are attracted to one or the other are choosing their attraction.
    I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. -- Susan B. Anthony


  4. #289
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    Why? If some folks are attracted to the same gender and some(most) are attracted to the opposite, I see no reason why it's not logical that there are some who are attracted to both. It in no way establishes that those who are attracted to one or the other are choosing their attraction.
    See that's my issue though. It just seems like everyday another kind of weirdo is claiming they were born that way.

    I admit I'm just giving my opinion on this topic.

  5. #290
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    Like I tell everyone else, he's a scorpion. As soon as you reach your hand out and trust the fucker, he'll sting you in a NY minute and let you drown like the frog!
    You assign him way too much credit. A scorpion has game(stinger). OCA comes in blustering like he's some hurricane and then posts with all the force of a flea fart.
    I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. -- Susan B. Anthony


  6. #291
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    See that's my issue though. It just seems like everyday another kind of weirdo is claiming they were born that way.

    I admit I'm just giving my opinion on this topic.
    We have no problem believing that people are born more or less intelligent, creative, sane, athletic, coordinated, etc.
    I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. -- Susan B. Anthony


  7. #292
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,599
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    Why? If some folks are attracted to the same gender and some(most) are attracted to the opposite, I see no reason why it's not logical that there are some who are attracted to both. It in no way establishes that those who are attracted to one or the other are choosing their attraction.
    From all I've read and observed, including the weird boys and girls as a kid, not too mention some observations as a teacher in ps-8 grades. Lots of observations that at least some seem way more than predisposed towards gay.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  8. #293
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    We have no problem believing that people are born more or less intelligent, creative, sane, athletic, coordinated, etc.
    Well, as I've said I think the whole born that way/choice thing is a giant red herring anyway. Americans have the RIGHT to CHOOSE to be gay if they want even if it is a choice.

    It is really no different than if someone said " show me the has to have a 500 HP sports car" gene. Oh you can't? Then you can't have one.

  9. #294
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,935
    Thanks (Given)
    4221
    Thanks (Received)
    4556
    Likes (Given)
    1427
    Likes (Received)
    1078
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    My bad then. But in reality, and I suppose against my argument, it won't surprise me if in the future the SC decides that Loving set the legal precedent and meets the burden for gays to legally marry as well. I don't know. THEN, if they did, there would be actual "rights" granted to them, as per the OP. But I'm of the belief, that as it stands now, they have no standing to use the 14th.
    I will admit to possible having stated an opinion strongly. At this point all we can do is argue about it because the Supremes have not weighed in but the case has been used in the debate.
    In the August 4, 2010 federal district court decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, which overturned California's Proposition 8 (which restricted marriage to opposite-sex couples), Judge Vaughn Walker cited Loving v. Virginia to conclude that "the [constitutional] right to marry protects an individual's choice of marital partner regardless of gender".[14] On more narrow grounds, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.[15][16]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    How is it not protected under the first
    Marriage, and the state "benefits," have zero to do with the First in this day and age.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  10. #295
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    I will admit to possible having stated an opinion strongly. At this point all we can do is argue about it because the Supremes have not weighed in but the case has been used in the debate.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia



    Marriage, and the state "benefits," have zero to do with the First in this day and age.
    no, but the should. and that is the argument that gays should be making instead of getting embroiled in the "gay gene" debate.

  11. #296
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,935
    Thanks (Given)
    4221
    Thanks (Received)
    4556
    Likes (Given)
    1427
    Likes (Received)
    1078
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    no, but the should. and that is the argument that gays should be making instead of getting embroiled in the "gay gene" debate.
    I'm not sure what argument you think they should be making. I haven't seen every point they've been using to argue but equal protection seems valid to me as it speaks to government preferencing one group over another. Now of course, I think they should remove all reference to marriage, especially at the Federal level, but that is not a Constitutional question IMO.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  12. #297
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    I'm not sure what argument you think they should be making. I haven't seen every point they've been using to argue but equal protection seems valid to me as it speaks to government preferencing one group over another. Now of course, I think they should remove all reference to marriage, especially at the Federal level, but that is not a Constitutional question IMO.
    If marriage is a religious institution and the government is picking and choosing with marriages they will recognize that is certainly a first amendment issue as that is PRECISELY what the first was written to prevent.

  13. #298
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    If marriage is a "religious institution," then how does one account for marriages performed as civil ceremonies?
    My sister and her husband were married by a JP in a banquet hall. The ceremony contained no references to God or religion.
    If a legal marriage ceremony can be performed outside of religion, why should religious beliefs restrict who can be married?
    Also, if you look online, you can find perfectly legal marriage ceremonies were men and women are "married" to trees, buildings and inflatable dolls. But yet consenting adults of the same sex can't marry each other?

    As to the point of people "choosing" to be gay, why be so selective? Can a person also "choose" to have cancer?
    "I'm sorry dear, but I have chosen to have lung cancer and I will die within a couple of years. I hope you understand my choice."
    Last edited by gabosaurus; 06-05-2012 at 11:58 PM.

  14. #299
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    333
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37835

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    Denying something based on a LIFESTYLE CHOICE is NOT denying someone something based on their gender.
    Homosexuality is an orientation, not a lifestyle choice.
    "You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders – The most famous of which is “never get involved in a land war in Asia” – but only slightly less well-known is this: “Never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line”! - Vizzini (The Princess Bride)
    http://mywinterstorm83.livejournal.com/

  15. #300
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    You assign him way too much credit. A scorpion has game(stinger). OCA comes in blustering like he's some hurricane and then posts with all the force of a flea fart.
    I've handed you your ass so many times that your ass is gone and your colon is now tan from exposure to the sun.

    You are and have always been a joke.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums