Page 3 of 30 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 441

Thread: Uh Oh

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Missileman View Post
    One couple divorcing proves nothing of the sort.
    Except when they are one of the leaders of the movement and get divorced so quickly thereafter.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Except when they are one of the leaders of the movement and get divorced so quickly thereafter.
    Lots of people rush into marriage and in fact marry for reasons other than love; it says nothing about whether other couples are in love.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Lots of people rush into marriage and in fact marry for reasons other than love; it says nothing about whether other couples are in love.
    Most of them aren't pushing a radical political agenda.

    Anyway, anyone else want to weigh in? This fucking imbecile doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Most of them aren't pushing a radical political agenda.

    Anyway, anyone else want to weigh in? This fucking imbecile doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
    Well, at least you know your place.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Well, at least you know your place.
    Hello!

    When is your 6th grade graduation?

    You are like a little leaguer and i'm fucking Verlander of the Tigers, you have zero chance against me.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Hello!

    When is your 6th grade graduation?

    You are like a little leaguer and i'm fucking Verlander of the Tigers, you have zero chance against me.

    uh yeah right. The only reason you even bother trying to argue this topic is an attempt to hide your own gay feelings.


    You have NO logical reason for opposing churches from marrying gays if they want. "it's icky and bad for society" isn't enough. No matter how loud you scream it.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,895
    Thanks (Given)
    4182
    Thanks (Received)
    4529
    Likes (Given)
    1414
    Likes (Received)
    1066
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Can someone show me where individuals who choose the homosexual lifestyle are at birth denied any rights guaranteed by the 14th amendment?
    Can you show where the right to straight marriage is codified in the Constitution?
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    Can you show where the right to straight marriage is codified in the Constitution?
    Can he find where marriage is mentioned at ALL in the COTUS. It in fact isn't , which means (as I know we agree) that marriage is OUTSIDE the purview of the government and thus they have no right to define it.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    333
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Can someone show me where individuals who choose the homosexual lifestyle are at birth denied any rights guaranteed by the 14th amendment?
    They don't 'choose' any lifestyle. They just are.
    "You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders – The most famous of which is “never get involved in a land war in Asia” – but only slightly less well-known is this: “Never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line”! - Vizzini (The Princess Bride)
    http://mywinterstorm83.livejournal.com/

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    333
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OCA View Post
    Fact is they aren't, the equal protection clause does not apply to lifestyle choices.
    It applies to your lifestyle choice doesn't it? If homosexuality is a lifestyle choice, it makes sense than heterosexuality is too.
    "You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders – The most famous of which is “never get involved in a land war in Asia” – but only slightly less well-known is this: “Never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line”! - Vizzini (The Princess Bride)
    http://mywinterstorm83.livejournal.com/

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    11,865
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nell's Room View Post
    They don't 'choose' any lifestyle. They just are.
    IRRELEVANT.

    The fact is in THIS country, we have a right to choose to do things that may not be "normal" as long as it harms no one else. When people like OCA start screaming "choice" they are only trying to deflect because they know they can't debate the central argument that the gov't has no right to deny marriage to people.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    Can you show where the right to straight marriage is codified in the Constitution?
    It isn't just like the equal rights clause doesn't apply, its left up to states and there is no basis for overturning bans based upon COTUS and the 14th.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    uh yeah right. The only reason you even bother trying to argue this topic is an attempt to hide your own gay feelings.


    You have NO logical reason for opposing churches from marrying gays if they want. "it's icky and bad for society" isn't enough. No matter how loud you scream it.
    You don't have a fucking clue.......find where the 14th applies or shut the fuck up.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    333
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    IRRELEVANT.

    The fact is in THIS country, we have a right to choose to do things that may not be "normal" as long as it harms no one else. When people like OCA start screaming "choice" they are only trying to deflect because they know they can't debate the central argument that the gov't has no right to deny marriage to people.
    You would be correct. I have not heard one single argument against gay marriage that can't be shot down in flames. The anti gay rabble don't have any argument - and if they think their Bible can make the argument for them, they are kidding themselves.
    "You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders – The most famous of which is “never get involved in a land war in Asia” – but only slightly less well-known is this: “Never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line”! - Vizzini (The Princess Bride)
    http://mywinterstorm83.livejournal.com/

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    9,133
    Thanks (Given)
    71
    Thanks (Received)
    58
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConHog View Post
    Can he find where marriage is mentioned at ALL in the COTUS. It in fact isn't , which means (as I know we agree) that marriage is OUTSIDE the purview of the government and thus they have no right to define it.
    Its up to the states dumbass.

    Did you and Juanita go get blood tests when you married her? Sure you did, a GOVERNMENT requirement.

    When they pronounce you man and wife they say " by the power vested in me by God and the great state of (whatever)".......marriage sure is a government function dumbfuck, state givernment.

    God I swear! You are dumber than a box of bricks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums