Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 69 of 69
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Think Solyndra and you have my city. Not far from San Jose and SE of San Francisco.
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mundame View Post
    Originally Posted by Robert A WhitWhy did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?





    Wait ---- is voting supposed to be about "helping people," like giving out lots of extra food stamps or making war on benighted Afghans to "help" them?

    I voted for Perot, but it never occurred to me to suppose it was about helping people. I just thought he'd be the best president. Well, admittedly, after Perot quit the race once, my faith in him got a little tarnished, but I did it anyway.

    I don't think the theory of democracy has anything to do with "helping" people with one's vote.
    Yes. You voted to help Perot.
    It is my mission to try to mentor posters as to what it takes to make a good president. As I stated, I looked hard at Perot out of some annoyance with Bush 41 and of course I did not want Clinton to win. Apparently you did not mind Clinton winning. Were I Clinton, I would have sent people like you a thank you card.

    Perot understood business and too often Democrats don't like business so they trash experts in business. I jumped off the Perot bandwagon when he quit. I don't back quitters.

    This country is not exactly a democracy since the public plays no part in how the Feds govern. Voting each 4 years for a new guy is a crude way to govern. Sort of like the ships captain sails for Hawaii but heads to Alaska and 4 years later voters want a new captain.

    Obama is going the wrong way. Clinton had lots more experience than Obama but as we know now, the man was too much interested in the ladies, including other mens wives but thankfully republicans were on hand to force him to steer the proper course.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Think Solyndra and you have my city. Not far from San Jose and SE of San Francisco.
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    1994.
    Clinton's lemmings were true believers. And I doubt they changed their minds allowing 1994 to happen. Are you claiming 1994 was a sign of Clinton fatigue that early?

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    I do recall Perot being rather short.

    True...............

    But his ears were so big that made up for it.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert A Whit View Post
    It is my mission to try to mentor posters as to what it takes to make a good president. As I stated, I looked hard at Perot out of some annoyance with Bush 41 and of course I did not want Clinton to win. Apparently you did not mind Clinton winning. Were I Clinton, I would have sent people like you a thank you card.

    Thank God somebody is mentoring us! We just wouldn't know what to do otherwise.

    Well, darn, I wish you had been Clinton!! 1) You'd have sent me a thank you card, and 2) you probably don't like fat chicks named Monica.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Think Solyndra and you have my city. Not far from San Jose and SE of San Francisco.
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mundame View Post
    True...............

    But his ears were so big that made up for it.
    One advantage to the ears of Obama is that he does not need ear muffs in cold weather.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Think Solyndra and you have my city. Not far from San Jose and SE of San Francisco.
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mundame View Post
    Thank God somebody is mentoring us! We just wouldn't know what to do otherwise.

    Well, darn, I wish you had been Clinton!! 1) You'd have sent me a thank you card, and 2) you probably don't like fat chicks named Monica.
    Clinton was religious. He liked Monica for her works.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867369

    Default



    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,927
    Thanks (Given)
    4213
    Thanks (Received)
    4552
    Likes (Given)
    1426
    Likes (Received)
    1077
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert A Whit View Post
    Clinton's lemmings were true believers. And I doubt they changed their minds allowing 1994 to happen. Are you claiming 1994 was a sign of Clinton fatigue that early?
    It certainly was a rebuttal to his agenda. And no Clinton voters needed to change their mind; he only got 43?% of the vote.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  9. #69
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    23,251
    Thanks (Given)
    7207
    Thanks (Received)
    11746
    Likes (Given)
    1048
    Likes (Received)
    1381
    Piss Off (Given)
    4
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert A Whit View Post
    Clinton was religious. He liked Monica for her works.


    We all know. Bill Clinton fathered Monica's Immaculate MissConception....and Obama was born.
    I love to make Liberals Cry, and Whine.
    So, this is for them.
    GOD BLESS AMERICA - IN GOD WE TRUST !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums