From FEMA training - the essence of the Second Amendment

[jafar00]

How many does there have to be? Better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have one...

But, to your question...


Nidal Malik Hasan.

Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar.

John Allen Muhammad.

Michael Julius Ford.

Naveed Afzal Haq.

Sulejman Talović.

Nidal Malik Hasan - Cracked in the workplace like many others have in the US. This is not a terrorist act.

Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar - a nutter drives his car into people then calls 9/11 to turn himself in. In what way was that terrorism?

John Allen Muhammad - Are all serial killings terrorism now?

Michael Julius Ford - Another workplace shooting. Not terrorism.

Naveed Afzal Haq - Was Wade Michael Page (Sikh temple shooter) also a terrorist?

Sulejman Talović - How is that terrorism? Seems like a normal everyday shopping mall/School shooting you see all the time in the US

There are just a few, and you should see the list of so called "honor killings," what a fucking joke that term is...

I agree with you. There is nothing honourable about "honour" killing.

[logroller]

Nidal Malik Hasan - Cracked in the workplace like many others have in the US. This is not a terrorist act.

Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar - a nutter drives his car into people then calls 9/11 to turn himself in. In what way was that terrorism?

John Allen Muhammad - Are all serial killings terrorism now?

Michael Julius Ford - Another workplace shooting. Not terrorism.

Naveed Afzal Haq - Was Wade Michael Page (Sikh temple shooter) also a terrorist?

Sulejman Talović - How is that terrorism? Seems like a normal everyday shopping mall/School shooting you see all the time in the US




I agree with you. There is nothing honourable about "honour" killing.

the shoe bomber, the 2010 Times Square car bomb, the little rock army recruiting station shooting...and as for fort hood, that certainly qualifies as terrorism-- its just a legal technicality surrounding military jurisdiction that it is classified otherwise. There is no terrorism charge in military justice; so if they said it was terrorism, he couldn't be tried under military law. But because of where he committed the crimes, its solely a military matter.

[jafar00]

the shoe bomber, the 2010 Times Square car bomb, the little rock army recruiting station shooting...and as for fort hood, that certainly qualifies as terrorism-- its just a legal technicality surrounding military jurisdiction that it is classified otherwise. There is no terrorism charge in military justice; so if they said it was terrorism, he couldn't be tried under military law. But because of where he committed the crimes, its solely a military matter.

Ok so explain how a bunch of civilians running about with guns would have changed the circumstances?

[logroller]

Ok so explain how a bunch of civilians running about with guns would have changed the circumstances?

In the bombings, it probably wouldn't. But the casualties from the shootings certainly could have been reduced. Most active shooter situations are committed against "soft targets" and end only after armed confrontation.

[Little-Acorn]

the shoe bomber, the 2010 Times Square car bomb, the little rock army recruiting station shooting...and as for fort hood, that certainly qualifies as terrorism-- its just a legal technicality surrounding military jurisdiction that it is classified otherwise. There is no terrorism charge in military justice; so if they said it was terrorism, he couldn't be tried under military law. But because of where he committed the crimes, its solely a military matter.

Ok

Well, well. At long last, jafar finally agrees that islamic terrorism was indeed islamic terrorism.

If this thread accomplishes nothing else, at least it accomplished that.

[mundame]

The OP from FEMA sounds like Red Dawn.