Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,646
    Thanks (Given)
    357
    Thanks (Received)
    2156
    Likes (Given)
    39
    Likes (Received)
    233
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1559079

    Default Only a lefty could remain anonymous under such circumstrances

    If she is so proud of her "expression", why isn't her name disclosed?

    http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/...sed-as-pope/2/
    Experienced Social Distancer ... waaaay before COVID.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    4,350
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1247455

    Default

    If she had instead chosen to be a naked Mohammed, I wonder if the outcry against her would be more or less severe?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    Should she be punished? By the law/rules, yes she should. Not for any religious slights, rather because of the public decency rules. Who cares if she was dressed as the Pope or Dawkins, its the nudity that's the punishable offence.

    As for whether nudity should be a punishable offence...is for another thread.
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums