Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 90

Thread: The Patriots

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron Von Esslingen View Post
    Well, I am a patriot and I have objected for years to the corporate mindset that knows no borders and will sell anyone down the river for a buck/euro/yuan.

    Amazing how many free-trade corporatists there are here. Count me out. Permanently.
    It's a natural outcome of the creation of corporations. The conundrum for me is that so many good things would never have been achieved without the power of corporations. Adam Smith's vision of sole traders simply wouldn't have achieved what has been done by corporations. But now corporations are completely out of control and are plunging us headlong into an environmental disaster. Our governments seem to be powerless against them and some have even become their servants instead of our servants.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200645

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dilloduck View Post
    Some substance would be nice. Educating people? Depends on what they're teaching. I'd be interested to see the curriculum and who is going to fund it.
    Liberal democrats, who else?


  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26439
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9981
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    No. I'm an internationalist. Fuck governments.

    It's time the people of the earth came together under one government. We will not survive otherwise.

    Fuck patriotism. It always leads to killing and tyranny.
    The people of the Earth will never come together, much less under one government.

    Fuck your globalist, socialist idealism. It will lead to nothing but two classes of people ... those who are served and those doing the serving.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LOki View Post
    It's also amazing that so many communists attempt the smear tactic of associating free-trade with corporatism, as if they're related. It's further more amazing how well that smear tactic works on the retarded.

    speaking of retarded Loki, have you read your post?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
    No, your an ignoramus looking for a one world tyranny. We can survive just fine without an algore or edwards anti-christ telling us how to live.
    GW is neither an algore or an edwards antichrist. Nor is he an ignoramus.

    You just can't listen to his POV without cowering in fear at a reasonable challenge to your reactionary nonsense ideology.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    990
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW in Ohio View Post
    It's time the people of the earth came together under one government.
    GW, it's time for your medication now.
    America: White people footing the bill for a party they're not allowed to attend.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diuretic View Post
    It's a natural outcome of the creation of corporations. The conundrum for me is that so many good things would never have been achieved without the power of corporations. Adam Smith's vision of sole traders simply wouldn't have achieved what has been done by corporations. But now corporations are completely out of control and are plunging us headlong into an environmental disaster. Our governments seem to be powerless against them and some have even become their servants instead of our servants.
    So true. When left to strive for profit and profit alone acheivements are realized that would be impossible if one were thwarted at all by concience or social responsibility.

    It is like war, capable of summuning the epitome of human potential toward the most useless and/or destructive ends. And some collateral accomplishments are also realized.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Fuck your globalist, socialist idealism. It will lead to nothing but two classes of people ... those who are served and those doing the serving.
    Oh come the fuck on Gunny. That is what the rights of kings, the elite burgoise and corporatism have always strove to acheive.

    A two class society. One class with priviledge, wealth and power and the other without.

    How is socialist idealism, no matter how misguided, guilty of leading toward something it was born to oppose?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26439
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9981
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loosecannon View Post
    Oh come the fuck on Gunny. That is what the rights of kings, the elite burgoise and corporatism have always strove to acheive.

    A two class society. One class with priviledge, wealth and power and the other without.

    How is socialist idealism, no matter how misguided, guilty of leading toward something it was born to oppose?
    Ideologically, I would agree with you. In practice, all socialist societies have the ruling class and the ruled class.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron Von Esslingen View Post
    Well, I am a patriot and I have objected for years to the corporate mindset that knows no borders and will sell anyone down the river for a buck/euro/yuan.

    Amazing how many free-trade corporatists there are here. Count me out. Permanently.
    Count you out of what Baron? Being a free trade corporatist? Done. No prob.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Ideologically, I would agree with you. In practice, all socialist societies have the ruling class and the ruled class.
    If by socialist societies you mean the faux 'coomie states' like Cuba, USSR, China, N Korea. Yeah sure.

    Those were authoritarian states first and foremeost.

    The single characteristic that is used to define a communist state in the last 50 years is state ownership of the means of production. That was marx's words and he invented the idea.

    But authoritarian states that mimiced communism in name only (listed above) owned everything, not just the means of production. And communism was defined as the last stage of an evolutionary journey from exploitive capitalism to citizen ownership of industry via gummit.

    It never happened. Authoritarians took up the names and popularity of communism so they could jump directly to something much like the rule of kings. German Democratic Republic, google it.

    Depending on what is meant when you say "socialist nation", you could be refering to the US or North Korea.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26439
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9981
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loosecannon View Post
    If by socialist societies you mean the faux 'coomie states' like Cuba, USSR, China, N Korea. Yeah sure.

    Those were authoritarian states first and foremeost.

    The single characteristic that is used to define a communist state in the last 50 years is state ownership of the means of production. That was marx's words and he invented the idea.

    But authoritarian states that mimiced communism in name only (listed above) owned everything, not just the means of production. And communism was defined as the last stage of an evolutionary journey from exploitive capitalism to citizen ownership of industry via gummit.

    It never happened. Authoritarians took up the names and popularity of communism so they could jump directly to something much like the rule of kings. German Democratic Republic, google it.

    Depending on what is meant when you say "socialist nation", you could be refering to the US or North Korea.
    True, but what I was not addressing was socialist idealism. I don't particularly care for that either. Who wants to be an identical cookie living in a cookie cutter house driving a cookie cutter car to a cookie cutter job? Socialism, IMO, promotes apathy. There is no incentive to excel. The cookie cutter dude next door could be half as smart and half as capable and STILL get paid the same and have the same as you.

    I WAS referring to the bastardized verisons of Marxist societies that promoted a two-class society.

    Hell, our middle class here is becoming a vanishing breed.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    True, but what I was not addressing was socialist idealism. I don't particularly care for that either. Who wants to be an identical cookie living in a cookie cutter house driving a cookie cutter car to a cookie cutter job? Socialism, IMO, promotes apathy. There is no incentive to excel. The cookie cutter dude next door could be half as smart and half as capable and STILL get paid the same and have the same as you.

    I WAS referring to the bastardized verisons of Marxist societies that promoted a two-class society.

    Hell, our middle class here is becoming a vanishing breed.
    OK, so we agree and GW prob does as well. Those false socialist states that promote a two class hierarchy and authoritarian rule as as deplorable to almost every partisan or ideological sector as is the rule of kings. Nobody wants to become the failed USSR or North Korea.

    Our vanishing middle class should pay very careful attention to the new two class advocates who promote globalization platforms like the new World Bank chairman.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bluebonnet Country
    Posts
    720
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    227

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LOki View Post
    It's also amazing that so many communists attempt the smear tactic of associating free-trade with corporatism, as if they're related. It's further more amazing how well that smear tactic works on the retarded.
    Communists will lie about anything to stay in power. I have no such agenda nor do I have any such power nor do I believe, even incrementally, in communism. I believe in democracy by, for and of the people not the corporations. Hope that clears it up for ya.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,931
    Thanks (Given)
    34347
    Thanks (Received)
    26439
    Likes (Given)
    2371
    Likes (Received)
    9981
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loosecannon View Post
    OK, so we agree and GW prob does as well. Those false socialist states that promote a two class hierarchy and authoritarian rule as as deplorable to almost every partisan or ideological sector as is the rule of kings. Nobody wants to become the failed USSR or North Korea.

    Our vanishing middle class should pay very careful attention to the new two class advocates who promote globalization platforms like the new World Bank chairman.
    Therein lies the problem in our own politics as well as globalization. The middle class are too busy trying to make it to pay much attention to the cause of their ailments. They're too busy to vote and/or demand accountability from their elected officials, and as long as it isn't their factory being shipped to Malaysia it isn't their problem.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums