I don't accept any source as the end all; my first clue that something was amiss was the OP link being down, so I googled it and snopes was the first hit. So unless google is in on the conspiracy, I'm leaning towards accepting Snopes' finding of
false. I had wanted to check and see if the PETA people had assaulted the bikers first-- throwing blood, spray painting their leathers or whatnot. That changes things in my opinion-- thats my standard and it universal. Whether they threw blood or came at them with swords doesn't matter to me-- Its who instigated the situation by committing a crime. No matter though, nothing happened.
Right. That's why you don't answer my challenge. It has nothing do with the fact the OP is false.
My attitude indicated nothing but my doubts on the veracity of your claim-- I didn't deny what you said, nor disagree with you-- I expressed doubt. I mean, you think I should accept what you say when you're entire point was that I shouldn't accept another source's credibility. The only thing left to ponder is whether that's more flush with irony or hypocrisy.
Furthermore, I gave you a chance to back up what you said, implying that there maybe some truth to it. You declined; so your credibility is hardly something I should take stock in. At least snopes provides sources.
Your excuse is that I wouldn't believe you anyways, but that didn't keep you from responding to me in the first place. Time and time again i entertain your idiosyncrasies in hopes you might actual argue a point with the slightest modicum of form, and yet again you've failed.
I've been through this so many times with you. Next up is transference, where Eventually you get to the point that even you can't deny the idiocy of ramblings and you'll say you're imitating me and tell me I just want the last word. I guess that's better than having you post poo pics like you do others with whom you disagree. Imitation is the highest form of flattery, even when you fail at it so stupendously.
By the way, I didn't say, nor did I imply that you were a liar, because you might actually believe what you said-- then again, maybe not, and what you sense as my attitude is actually your conscience.
Regardless, with no proof to affirmative, the OP is fictitious.
Now let's see if you can give me the last word, not respond to this and prove me mistaken about that being your transferring your own self upon me.