Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default Why Does Obama Hate Poor People?

    I ask this question since liberals always ask this of Republicans when the rich get richer and the poor get poorer when a Republican is President

    Well guess what? The same thing has happened with Obama sitting in the Oval Office

    OK Obama lap dogs, step right up and offer your defense and tell us why the same standards applied to Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43 do not apply in Obama's case



    Obamanomics: The president has been decrying the growing gap between rich and poor in the U.S. to help sell his retread tax-and-spend proposals. But those policies have already produced record levels of income inequality.

    In his speech in Illinois last week, and at events since, Obama described income inequality in the starkest terms. "This growing inequality is morally wrong," he said, and "undermines the very essence of America."

    To be sure, income inequality is a standard trope for liberals, who always use it to advocate more wealth redistribution.

    And Obama's latest focus neatly coincides with his plans to push for more federal spending and taxes on the "rich" in coming budget battles.

    But what Obama conveniently leaves out of his sermons is that income inequality has grown faster on his watch than any time in the past two decades, at least.
    Research by University of California economist Emmanuel Saez shows that since the Obama recovery started in June 2009, the average income of the top 1% grew 11.2% in real terms through 2011.

    The bottom 99%, in contrast, saw their incomes shrink by 0.4%.

    As a result, 121% of the gains in real income during Obama's recovery have gone to the top 1%. By comparison, the top 1% captured 65% of income gains during the Bush expansion of 2002-07, and 45% of the gains under Clinton's expansion in the 1990s.


    Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editor...#ixzz2exQeO0FJ
    Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook



    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,646
    Thanks (Given)
    357
    Thanks (Received)
    2156
    Likes (Given)
    39
    Likes (Received)
    233
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1559079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    I ask this question since liberals always ask this of Republicans when the rich get richer and the poor get poorer when a Republican is President

    Well guess what? The same thing has happened with Obama sitting in the Oval Office

    OK Obama lap dogs, step right up and offer your defense and tell us why the same standards applied to Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43 do not apply in Obama's case
    Two words: Perception management
    Experienced Social Distancer ... waaaay before COVID.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tailfins View Post
    Two words: Perception management
    or liberal double standards

    Without which, liberals would have no standards at all


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default Stephanopoulos Rationalizes Obama’s Economic Failures

    Leave it to the liberal media to offer up defenses for the failures of Obama



    <IFRAME title="MRC TV video player" height=293 src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/122793" frameBorder=0 width=520 allowfullscreen=""></IFRAME>


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,968
    Thanks (Given)
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    39
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    Leave it to the liberal media to offer up defenses for the failures of Obama
    WHAT? OMG! You mean biased people make excuses for people on 'their side'? That's simply amazing. Who would have thought it?




  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbo View Post
    WHAT? OMG! You mean biased people make excuses for people on 'their side'? That's simply amazing. Who would have thought it?



    At least you admit the liberal media is on Obama's side and not doing their job of reporting the who, what, when , where, and why of the days events


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,968
    Thanks (Given)
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    39
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    At least you admit the liberal media is on Obama's side and not doing their job of reporting the who, what, when , where, and why of the days events

    There is and always was biased media, but more than bias, the media (or 'news') is about making money. What stories 'sell', bring more viewers/readers, and thus pad their capitalistic pockets.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    I ask this question since liberals always ask this of Republicans when the rich get richer and the poor get poorer when a Republican is President

    Well guess what? The same thing has happened with Obama sitting in the Oval Office

    OK Obama lap dogs, step right up and offer your defense and tell us why the same standards applied to Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43 do not apply in Obama's case
    The idiot acts as if somebody else has been the President for the last 4 years and worse is that he gets away with that thanks to his adoring and slavish media.
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    The idiot acts as if somebody else has been the President for the last 4 years and worse is that he gets away with that thanks to his adoring and slavish media.
    Up until Obama, liberals have always demonstrated their selective outrage and double standards

    Now with Obama in office they are now showing they are experts at selective memory loss

    Of course should any Obama lap dog step up to the plate and post on this thread, you can bet they wlil pass the buck and - gasp - blame Bush


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867370

    Default



    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums