Page 20 of 20 FirstFirst ... 10181920
Results 286 to 295 of 295
  1. #286
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    South East Texas
    Posts
    1,383
    Thanks (Given)
    74
    Thanks (Received)
    48
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    913952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbo View Post
    So around we go back to your lack of comprehension? No, NOTHING bothers me, unlike you and your fellow westboro baptist types.



    You'd have to respond on topic to have a discussion. You want to continue to bitch about how gays want to 'redefine' something that you don't even support in terms of it's original intent and meaning. You shy away from the reality that it has been 'redefined' across time because that kills your argument… or you actually believe in the original version where you can marry kids and you get your brothers wife if he dies. So which is it?
    Yes i knew you were, bursting to get that out as if it makes a difference, as i said marriage traditions has changed but the Definition has not, but ill tell you what has not changed, not even the New Testament Changed it, King James Bible
    If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them, lucky the New Testament did change the Put To Death part Huh.
    Christian Democrat has become an oxymoron

  2. #287
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,968
    Thanks (Given)
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    39
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrymc View Post
    but the Definition has not,
    Yes, it has. You can not say it is between 'man and woman' when it was fine for it to be 'man and girl'. That is a definition change. Period.

    Keep on ignoring that reality, it shows your hypocrisy.

    If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them,
    And you support that, right?

  3. #288
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In a house; two stories, suburban
    Posts
    7,471
    Thanks (Given)
    214
    Thanks (Received)
    264
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2395474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrymc View Post
    No a redefinition is what you Homosexuals want, some Traditions of marriage may have changed over time, but Marriage by definition is still a Union of a Man and a Woman.
    I want government out of marriage; I don't believe it belongs there in the first place. Between God, my wife and myself, it's just fine.

    I'm concerned for any marriage, especially one that you believe needs government sanction. Can you show me an example of any intimate relationship that was better thanks to government?
    He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.AeschylusRead more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/qu...zeMUwcpY1Io.99

  4. #289
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    South East Texas
    Posts
    1,383
    Thanks (Given)
    74
    Thanks (Received)
    48
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    913952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbo View Post
    Yes, it has. You can not say it is between 'man and woman' when it was fine for it to be 'man and girl'. That is a definition change. Period.

    Keep on ignoring that reality, it shows your hypocrisy.



    And you support that, right?
    HaHa there's your favorite word again, Just Stop Your Desperation is making you look like a FOOL
    Christian Democrat has become an oxymoron

  5. #290
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,968
    Thanks (Given)
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    39
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrymc View Post
    HaHa there's your favorite word again, Just Stop Your Desperation is making you look like a FOOL
    Ah, avoids all questions where he knows the answer will go against his beliefs. Believe me, it is you and your WB brethren that play the part of fools. Now do you have an answer to the reality that the definition has changed? Or do we get more diversion?

  6. #291
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    South East Texas
    Posts
    1,383
    Thanks (Given)
    74
    Thanks (Received)
    48
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    913952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbo View Post
    Ah, avoids all questions where he knows the answer will go against his beliefs. Believe me, it is you and your WB brethren that play the part of fools. Now do you have an answer to the reality that the definition has changed? Or do we get more diversion?
    Already answered your question, sorry if you can't see the truth, Can't help with that, sorry im not a professional
    Christian Democrat has become an oxymoron

  7. #292
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,968
    Thanks (Given)
    37
    Thanks (Received)
    39
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrymc View Post
    sorry im not a professional
    That is obvious. Perhaps you need to see one.

  8. #293
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,895
    Thanks (Given)
    4182
    Thanks (Received)
    4529
    Likes (Given)
    1414
    Likes (Received)
    1066
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimnyc View Post
    That's a loaded statement for me to reply to, no way to win! Let's just say that I agree, the legislation isn't going to bring acceptance.


    We are in agreement, legislation doesn't bring acceptance, changing attitudes and time bring acceptance.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  9. #294
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,895
    Thanks (Given)
    4182
    Thanks (Received)
    4529
    Likes (Given)
    1414
    Likes (Received)
    1066
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    Really? So if I do not conform to the new principles the state has on moral issues then I am asking for special treatment? If I know the state has no right and no authority to try its best to force me to change my moral judgment (by various means) then I am in the wrong? I am sorry but Hoss it doesn't work that way. If I will not let any man force me to go against my own principles why would I let the State do it? I'd rather continue being the Red Oak tree( Quercus rubra ) my friend. Let others be the weeping pussy willow tree (Salix caprea). Methinks you value and think too highly of the perfection of the State. The State is not perfect and I reject its attacks upon myself and my family's principles. I am just the type of guy the State always destroys to push its way. Do you think my knowing that will stop me or force me to abandon my principles? --Tyr
    When have I ever given you the sense that I think "highly of the perfection of the State"? I've argued repeatedly that the state should not be involved in interpersonal relationships other than dispute resolution just like any other breach of contract.

    Nevertheless to your first point, the special treatment you seek is the validation of your relationship by the State and limiting the State's definition of marriage to your POV.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  10. #295
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,895
    Thanks (Given)
    4182
    Thanks (Received)
    4529
    Likes (Given)
    1414
    Likes (Received)
    1066
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Larrymc View Post
    Its been said many time on this forum, but you still come back to the same argument, Isn't That The Definition Of A Fool...
    No, that's the definition of insane which makes me wonder why you keep using the same flawed argument.

    And FWIW, bump.

    Quote Originally Posted by fj1200 View Post
    How do they want to be "another class of people"?

    Will you support removing marriage from the Federal code and replacing it with unions?
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums