"Dinner whores"

**Trigg** · 06-14-2007, 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by jackass

This isnt all the mens fault ya know. I work with and talk with alot of younger women and men..and women nowadays are very eager and easily give certain things out. From the people I talk to giving oral sex isnt that bog of a deal anymore. Its almost like making out when I was younger.

Like I said, glad I'm not out there dating these days. They'd probably think I was a prude.

BTW, of course you'd stick up for men you being one and all

**Kathianne** · 06-14-2007, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by Trigg

Of course I've heard of the 3rd date rule for getting sex, husbands single friends, they make the argument that if a women isn't interrested in them why would she keep going on dates. So, they would stop dating her if there is no sex after the 3rd date.

No, not all men are pigs.

here's to you meeting a nice one.

Seriously, I've met a minimum of 7 'nice ones', just not for me. But then again, I'm very gun shy. Not one of these guys expected any put out for a date. Or 4th date. When it came time to say, 'Not a long term deal' they were not only accepting, but ready to lay the parameters of a different scenario.

**remie** · 06-14-2007, 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. P

The thinking on this subject 30 years ago is alive and well. It was the same then as Hag just posted. There are dates and then there are dates. One for socializing, getting to know you and just fun, the other for romance. Romance IS spencive.

LOL Right you are Mr. P. I cant tell you how many $100 plus meals I fed my wife while I was trying to hem her up. And that took well over 2 years Romantic = Definately spensive.

And no, she didnt nor did I expect her to put out.

**Hobbit** · 06-14-2007, 03:40 PM

Wouldn't it be the opposite, really? Isn't a girl who 'puts out' just because the guy pays for dinner technically the whore here? I mean, she's basically getting paid for sex, which is the very definition of a whore.

**Kathianne** · 06-14-2007, 03:48 PM

Originally Posted by remie

LOL Right you are Mr. P. I cant tell you how many $100 plus meals I fed my wife while I was trying to hem her up. And that took well over 2 years Romantic = Definately spensive.

And no, she didnt nor did I expect her to put out.

I'm seriously unsure of where any of you are going. If I'm reading you all right, which is unlikely, there is no getting to know someone. One is either a whore or a tease, no inbetween.

The idea that a gentleman might be willing to pay for a meal or that a lady might offer to help or pay, or any combination forthcoming, is dismissed out of hand. Why? Probably because it suits those that are currently married.

**darin** · 06-14-2007, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by Hobbit

Wouldn't it be the opposite, really? Isn't a girl who 'puts out' just because the guy pays for dinner technically the whore here? I mean, she's basically getting paid for sex, which is the very definition of a whore.

I think Dinner Whore means she wants DINNER and uses the promise or suggestion of sex as the means.

**Dilloduck** · 06-14-2007, 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by dmp

I think Dinner Whore means she wants DINNER and uses the promise or suggestion of sex as the means.

BINGO----buy me a meal, big boy. "wink wink"

**Hobbit** · 06-14-2007, 04:23 PM

Originally Posted by dmp

I think Dinner Whore means she wants DINNER and uses the promise or suggestion of sex as the means.

Then it still makes no sense that the girl who doesn't put out is a whore. Then, she's just a bait-and-switcher.

**shattered** · 06-14-2007, 04:29 PM

Jeeze. Whatever happened to just doing something for another just because you want to...

**Hagbard Celine** · 06-14-2007, 04:56 PM

Originally Posted by Kathianne

I'm seriously unsure of where any of you are going. If I'm reading you all right, which is unlikely, there is no getting to know someone. One is either a whore or a tease, no inbetween.

The idea that a gentleman might be willing to pay for a meal or that a lady might offer to help or pay, or any combination forthcoming, is dismissed out of hand. Why? Probably because it suits those that are currently married.

Or--and stay with me here--sex is neither a prize nor a form of payment, but instead a pleasurable activity which both genders can and should partake of and enjoy equally. As is eating and one is not needed for the other. Although the two CAN be combined for an equally pleasurable experience.

**Trigg** · 06-14-2007, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by Hagbard Celine

. Although the two CAN be combined for an equally pleasurable experience.

Strawberries and whipcream????

***jimnyc*** · 06-14-2007, 05:08 PM

I'm always broke. Women ain't getting the dinner UNTIL they put out.

Any nice ladies want to share a meal?

**darin** · 06-14-2007, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Hobbit

Then it still makes no sense that the girl who doesn't put out is a whore. Then, she's just a bait-and-switcher.

It does - She's a DINNER whore, not a SEX whore.

Maybe Dinner Slut would be fitting?

**shattered** · 06-14-2007, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by jimnyc

I'm always broke. Women ain't getting the dinner UNTIL they put out.

Any nice ladies want to share a meal?

**shattered** · 06-14-2007, 05:11 PM

It's really unfortunate I didn't check my post count before replying to that. I *could* have made my 1900th post Board Owner Abuse...

Thread: "Dinner whores"

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions