Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    10,089
    Thanks (Given)
    18723
    Thanks (Received)
    8005
    Likes (Given)
    132
    Likes (Received)
    26
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9292005

    Default More Black on White Crime, but Not a Hate Crime Apparently

    This is getting so ridicules, I read one report where a gang of black thugs attacked a white man and beat him half to death ( because he was white ) and only one of those charged was charged with a hate crime, how can one be charged but the others involved in the same incident aren't ? And lets not forget the white idiot that thought it would be fun to try the knockout game against a older black man, he was charged instantly with a hate crime, what makes it different ? If you attack a person for no other reason than he/she is different than it should be a hate crime no matter what group is on the attack.


    This is becoming old, isn't it? For those who have read anything Colin Flaherty and/or Taleeb Starkes have written, we know that when it comes to blacks injuring or killing whites, these type of crimes are rarely charged as "hate crimes." Such seems to be the case with one of the most recent situations involving a 16-year-old thug who goes by the street name "Red," and an innocent white victim who tried to fight for his life.

    http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/bl...me-apparently/
    Never look down on someone unless you are helping them up

  2. Thanks Gaffer, Tyr-Ziu Saxnot thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    This is getting so ridicules, I read one report where a gang of black thugs attacked a white man and beat him half to death ( because he was white ) and only one of those charged was charged with a hate crime, how can one be charged but the others involved in the same incident aren't ? And lets not forget the white idiot that thought it would be fun to try the knockout game against a older black man, he was charged instantly with a hate crime, what makes it different ? If you attack a person for no other reason than he/she is different than it should be a hate crime no matter what group is on the attack.





    http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/bl...me-apparently/
    Holder and Obama see to it -- "dat dey peeples aint chaaged" , don't ya know...
    Holder even said so but the bamster never read such lines off of his magic teleprompter.

    They wage a war on whitey and the media stooges help them. I guess people know another group that needs some real justice delivered to them if ever we have a civil war.--Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  4. Thanks Gaffer, Jeff thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums