Taliban trade U.S. Soldier for 5 in Gitmo

[namvet]

[Drummond]

[aboutime]

[namvet]

[aboutime]

NAMVET: Wonder if he took his Muslim Brotherhood W/H Staff too?

[namvet]

[fj1200]

But this is just nonsense. Unless you're confused, or a Leftie, or even worse, a confused Leftie .. no clarification of what a terrorist IS, is ever called for.

SURELY, 9/11 taught you all you need to know ?

Terrorists are bipedal creatures, superficially human, yet possessing none of the qualities of a REAL human. They are subhuman savages, incapable of basic humanity where and when it counts to possess it, deserving of NO rights, NO privileges, NO consideration.

The world has had proof of this, far too many times !!! Unless you're blind, or just blinded by Left-wing propaganda which teaches you to defy the realities of the world today .. you MUST know all this.

From that understanding, all else follows. So you should need no clarification whatever, for any reason.

Nonsense is your irrational fear of questions and if you want to again take up your losing positions there are countless threads you've let lapse.

And the reason that we need to know what a terrorist is it's so we can develop an effective coherent plan. "Aack, terrorist, shoot 'em up, bang!!!" is not an effective policy to implement. What 9/11 has taught us is not to be ignorant to the threat, it shouldn't have taught us to shoot anyone that looks at us funny.

[fj1200]

... h'm. Focus never was your strong point, FJ.

The title of this thread is .. 'TALIBAN TRADE US SOLDIER FOR 5 IN GITMO'. You, however, have tried to divert it into discussion about WWII, the behaviour of the British of the time with regard to one aspect of it, and that war's aftermath.

Also: ...

.. an earlier post of yours, with you, now, wandering off of the terms of your own diversion !!

I've asked you to provide a list of names of those 'more than 5 higher up Nazi's'. Repeatedly. Instead, you now keep banging on - with NO obvious connection to the real reason for this thread !!! - about Nazi atrocities.

I take it that you cannot provide the list I asked for. I also take it that your enthusiasm for thread hijacks is remaining undiminished.

I did you one better than names, I gave you a whole history lesson of the hard choices of war. I am astonished that you can't see the connection between a release of despicable humans by the Brits 70 years ago and a trade of despicable humans present day; completely astonished you don't see a connection.

But yes, hide your ignorance behind your "hijacking" ploy.

... Left wing ... 'institutionalised liberalism' ... Left wing tabloid ... right-wing. ... Right-wing. ... Left-oriented ...

Who suggests your sources to you, FJ ? Or ... is it that your natural media gravitations are being revealed ?

Man, you dumb. The above bit is why you are always debating an uphill battle when you attempt to challenge me. You do realize that I merely linked you to google don't you and I merely listed the "leftie rags" that were on the first page? You probably don't because you let your imagination run wild.

[Jeff]