Originally Posted by
Drummond
A very good answer .. thank you ! I'm not moved to disagree with / challenge your points -- except, maybe, for just one ...
You say that this board has a reputation as one sided, ultra-conservative ? Well, if so, I say that this is no bad thing. But any suggestion that this is any barrier to 'the opposition' coming on here and giving their views their best shot, surely needn't (- and doesn't -) follow ?
Anyone strongly-enough motivated to give their views an airing, will do so. Some Left wingers might consider a 'one sided, ultra-conservative' site a challenge not to be avoided ! And, I say .. good luck to them, if they want to come on here and put their opposers to the test.
I can cite two notable examples of that. One concerned a right-wing discussion site which suffered the handicap of being very poorly administered. Along came election year, and with it, a deluge of applications from troll posters to join the site. They did so, and promptly deluged the site with troll posts.
I'm talking really nasty stuff .. one wishing death to a serving soldier on tour in Iraq. Another taunting a woman poster whose father had just died. Thanks to its poor regulation, these trolls even managed to post as regular posters, and drive wedges between former friends ...
My experience from that site suggested to me that the Left had no interest in fair dialogue .. just purely destructive offerings, meant to hurt and enrage people, to say nothing of establish near-terminal chaos.
The other example involved a British Left-wing site I was kicked off of, after six weeks. The Mod chiefly responsible then tracked me to an American right-wing site (NOT this one), joined it, and proceeded to post his rubbish. If I tell you his monicker was 'Marxist Nutter' (which it literally was), you get a good idea of what he posted.
He tested his 'views' .. and then some. Several weeks in .. and he gave up, realising he was getting nowhere. He may still be a member of that site (he was never kicked off), but to my knowledge he never returned. Which was entirely his choice, of course. He couldn't stand the heat, so he got out of the kitchen. Fair enough, and HIS CHOICE, is what I say to that.
My points are these ... Left-wingers will take on a site such as this one if they want to, regardless of what it's known to be. If they choose to stick with it, nothing - apart from their own decision-making, and chosen conduct - impedes that choice. So 'reputational deterrence' is not an argument which I think has any real merit to it, and my experiences show me I'm right.