Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default Any Suggestions?

    I'm looking for a digital camera that’s in the range of about $100-$130.

    Any suggestions about brands, or a particular model???

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default

    Ah shit I shoulda put this in the photo. section.

    Oh well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Carson City
    Posts
    3,147
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    838

    Default .......

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    Ah shit I shoulda put this in the photo. section.

    Oh well.
    Kodak has a couple that vary between $149.00-$179.00. I would reccommend the later. I think I payed about $180 for mine with a printer docking station 4 years ago and never had a problem with it, the quality is great for the price. I liked it so much I bought a $349.00 model for my dad and that one is awesome.

    If you attack the Clintons publically make sure all your friends know your not planning on commiting suicide ~ McCain 2008
    Happiness is Obama's picture on the back of a milk carton.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Biggest Little City In The World
    Posts
    1,569
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    You won't get shit for that little money... splurg a little... http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=15207

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,938
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    571480

    Default

    This was $300 back when I bought it.. NOW, you can probably get it for the money you want to spend if you dig around some.

    http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US

    Very easy to use, and has held up for 2.5 years now..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pale Rider View Post
    You won't get shit for that little money... splurg a little... http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=15207
    lol how much did you pay for that hunk? I'm guessing far over 200??
    It was only 8.0 megapixels.

    I can get a 7.2 megapixel for about 140.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,938
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    82
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    571480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    lol how much did you pay for that hunk? I'm guessing far over 200??
    It was only 8.0 megapixels.

    I can get a 7.2 megapixel for about 140.
    It's not very nice to ask for suggestions, and then insult the ones you're given.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    400
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    lol how much did you pay for that hunk? I'm guessing far over 200??
    It was only 8.0 megapixels.

    I can get a 7.2 megapixel for about 140.
    Where? Post it up so we can tear it down.
    It's easier to buy gear than talent.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    400
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    lol how much did you pay for that hunk? I'm guessing far over 200??
    It was only 8.0 megapixels.

    I can get a 7.2 megapixel for about 140.


    BTW, counting megapixels is perhaps the worst way to choose a camera.
    It's easier to buy gear than talent.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon View Post
    BTW, counting megapixels is perhaps the worst way to choose a camera.
    Ohh...
    What is?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    400
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    345

    Default

    And you're trying to compare that to the Canon S5? The comparable Sony model is the DSC-H9: http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/...uctId=20005011


    That said, for the type of photos you're likely to take, you might as well get the cheap brick.
    It's easier to buy gear than talent.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    400
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    Ohh...
    What is?
    By the quality of image a camera is able to take. Who cares if a camera has 8MP if:

    1) the images are riddled with noise and/or
    2) the images have a load of 'purple fringe' and/or
    3) the AF system is slow/inaccurate and you miss the shot you were trying to get and/or
    4) the shutter lag is extreme and you miss the shot you were trying to get and/or
    5) the images are frequently under/over exposed
    6) etc, etc


    It only takes 3-4 megapixels to produce a nice 8X10 (unless you crop).
    It's easier to buy gear than talent.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon View Post
    By the quality of image a camera is able to take. Who cares if a camera has 8MP if:

    1) the images are riddled with noise and/or
    2) the images have a load of 'purple fringe' and/or
    3) the AF system is slow/inaccurate and you miss the shot you were trying to get and/or
    4) the shutter lag is extreme and you miss the shot you were trying to get and/or
    5) the images are frequently under/over exposed
    6) etc, etc


    It only takes 3-4 megapixels to produce a nice 8X10 (unless you crop).
    Well I get what your saying, but I'm trying to find the best (meaning does all those things you listed the best) in the 100-150 dollar range.

    I don't know which brand er anything...they all seem the same to me...small little silver boxes.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    400
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Obama08 View Post
    Well I get what your saying, but I'm trying to find the best (meaning does all those things you listed the best) in the 100-150 dollar range.

    I don't know which brand er anything...they all seem the same to me...small little silver boxes.
    Fair enough.

    I'd lean toward Nikon or Canon. After that, Fuji, Sony, etc.

    I'd also start by looking at camera reviews at a site like www.dpreview.com

    Then, go and see which model works best for you.
    It's easier to buy gear than talent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums