Steady on ... you'll strain something. Credibility comes to mind ....
- BUT YOU HAVEN'T. You continue, still, to dodge my question.
Of course.
Interesting so far as it goes, but we only have your word for all of this. My attempt to get you to answer a simple question continues to be avoided .. now, with this diversionary account of 'happenings' which I take to be totally unconnected with this forum.
Actually - I think that you're describing my past debates with you, to an extent, anyway. You'll debate reasonably when you think you've a chance of winning. Since you're invariably proved wrong on that, so you instead go to abuse, diversion, ANYTHING other than admit you're wrong. Which, of course, is bog-standard Leftie fayre.
These days, you launch into troll stuff almost immediately -- because you're used to understanding that you're unlikely to 'win' otherwise against me (you delude yourself into thinking it serves your interests to try it, since you're trapped by your Leftie psychology into thinking that surface impressions can substitute for fact and reputability).
I've no idea at all what you're talking about. Present some examples !!!
You argue like a Leftie. The troll stuff itself is clear evidence of that, so you 'prove my charge' on a very regular basis, just from that alone. I see nothing wrong with pointing it out .. much though you'd like me not to.
Nope. You do it out of a mixture of the Leftie idea of 'fun' against an opponent, and sheer desperation, since you cannot win out otherwise. Its troll behaviour, which your psychology tells you is 'fine' to indulge in at the drop of a hat.
Nope .. see above. Dream on ...
Cease to argue as a Leftie. Cease to behave as one, courtesy, not least, of all the troll rot you dish out by the ton. In other words .. if you want to be considered a Conservative, START TO PROVE YOU'RE ONE.
As for this 'side of Lady Thatcher I can't square with my beliefs' .... I don't know what you're talking about. However I do recall telling you about her 'Section 28' legislation, which YOU could not square with YOUR beliefs. Indeed ... you might characterise it as a 'Big Government' position ... ??
Check it out --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_28
Remove your references to Lady Thatcher from you title and signature as you wish to ... I suggest you do so as an act of HONESTY, unconnected with any 'deal' you wish to concoct.
Originally Posted by fj1200
I've "crossed swords" with morons with active imaginations who are lacking in the capacity of engaging in a reasonable discussion and have the annoying habit of misidentifying lefties. Some of them claim to be conservative.
Reply With Quote
and 'fj'
posters that I've debated with in the past but I can't distinctly remember that they have been so mind numbingly stupid as you and some of your knucklehead friends. I mean, of course they've not made the best life choices in the past which have no doubt led to their liberal beliefs but they tend to no longer argue their points when they see that they can't get anywhere with the truth and fact that I present to them. They are free to present their views and I'll do my best to present an argument as to why they are wrong but they generally will no longer follow up when they are unable to present some facts or argument that will win the day against a truly conservative position.
