Homosexuality/other "so called" deviant behavior - Immoral or not? Abnormal, or not?

[Rahul]

There have been many discussions about homosexuality on this web site.

There are many that condemn homosexuality for being "wrong", "immoral" amongst other descriptions that I will not repost here as there are ladies viewing the thread, I am sure. However, to the best of my knowledge none of these accusations have been backed up.

These same people also seem to condemn other forms of deviance, such as S&M, fetishes, etc. . .

My question to the forum is: Is homosexuality/other forms of "deviant" sex immoral? Why, or why not?

Why, for instance, would a couple engaged in foot fetish activities be any more "abnormal" than a couple having sex in the missionary position?

I thought this issue deserved a thread of it's own, so we could mesh the issue out once and for all.

Your input would be appreciated. I am looking for logical and verbose answers, but not name calling and insults as some on here are famous for.



Rahul

[Gunny]

There have been many discussions about homosexuality on this web site.

There are many that condemn homosexuality for being "wrong", "immoral" amongst other descriptions that I will not repost here as there are ladies viewing the thread, I am sure. However, to the best of my knowledge none of these accusations have been backed up.

These same people also seem to condemn other forms of deviance, such as S&M, fetishes, etc. . .

My question to the forum is: Is homosexuality/other forms of "deviant" sex immoral? Why, or why not?

Why, for instance, would a couple engaged in foot fetish activities be any more "abnormal" than a couple having sex in the missionary position?

I thought this issue deserved a thread of it's own, so we could mesh the issue out once and for all.

Your input would be appreciated. I am looking for logical and verbose answers, but not name calling and insults as some on here are famous for.



Rahul

You mean "famous for" in the same context as this question has been answered for you at least 100 times in this forum; yet, because you don't like the answers you're going to keep asking the same question as if it was never answered until someone gives the answer you want or you drop dead?

[jimnyc]

All of the above would technically be considered "abnormal", but others are a little more extreme than others. Society might accept foot rubbing, sex without childbirth, a little S&M - but doesn't want to recognize queers as normal folks. It's as simple as that. There are literally thousands of people that engage in 'scat' activities all the time. When they start demanding rights, how closely will you listen?

[OCA]

All of the above would technically be considered "abnormal", but others are a little more extreme than others. Society might accept foot rubbing, sex without childbirth, a little S&M - but doesn't want to recognize queers as normal folks. It's as simple as that. There are literally thousands of people that engage in 'scat' activities all the time. When they start demanding rights, how closely will you listen?

Exactly, in India where this gomer is from pedophilia is considered normal, tell you anything?

Its all about man and woman......man and woman.

[diuretic]

What if it's about two women and a man or two men and a woman? Is that acceptable?

[Gunny]

What if it's about two women and a man or two men and a woman? Is that acceptable?

Let's see ... two men and a woman ... man even accidentally touches me and gets killed.

Uuummmm..... no?

[OCA]

What if it's about two women and a man or two men and a woman? Is that acceptable?

I've always said that I don't have the attention span for two women so for me no but I guess as long as the chicks attention is focused squarely on the guy and not on snacking on each other then thats ok.

Two guys and a chick vice-versa, but for me never, do not want swords crossing.

[Abbey Marie]

Let's see ... two men and a woman ... man even accidentally touches me and gets killed.

Uuummmm..... no?

[Gunny]

I've always said that I don't have the attention span for two women so for me no but I guess as long as the chicks attention is focused squarely on the guy and not on snacking on each other then thats ok.

Two guys and a chick vice-versa, but for me never, do not want swords crossing.

It's simpler than that to me ... I don't share.

[82Marine89]

My question to the forum is: Is homosexuality/other forms of "deviant" sex immoral? Why, or why not?


Rahul

Deviant? Two men sticking their dicks in each others asses? That is sick. That is immoral and it is not natural.

[diuretic]

Deviant? Two men sticking their dicks in each others asses? That is sick. That is immoral and it is not natural.

How about anal sex between a man and a woman?

[diuretic]

It's simpler than that to me ... I don't share.

Some do. Is that unnatural?

[OCA]

How about anal sex between a man and a woman?

Kinky..............not deviant because its between a man and a woman.

[OCA]

Some do. Is that unnatural?

For the most part...yes.

[diuretic]

Let's see ... two men and a woman ... man even accidentally touches me and gets killed.

Uuummmm..... no?

But is it unnatural?