`Ebola's gone...What's next?`

[Drummond]

Your imagination is kicking up again. I don't extend anything of the sort to conservatives, I extend it to idiots like you who see agenda driven lefties where they don't exist. Why don't you go find another thread to bring up Mags again in you hypocritical idiot.

Thank you for your usual, characteristically charismatic offering, FJ ...

But I'd like clarity on a point. To be clear, from your second sentence ... are you telling us that those you've crossed swords with, even besides myself, ARE NOT CONSERVATIVES ?

I suggest to you that they would disagree with you !! I suggest also that - if it's not already too late, as it probably is .. you might be wise to stop digging that almighty chasm for yourself that has already reached an advanced stage !!

But here's a thought. The thought being that THEY are Conservatives, and YOU are not ...

As for your latest rewrite of one of my posts, you are confusing the product of your persisting trolling activities .. with actual truth.

It's A Leftie Thing, eh, FJ .... ?

[fj1200]

But I'd like clarity on a point. To be clear, from your second sentence ... are you telling us that those you've crossed swords with, even besides myself, ARE NOT CONSERVATIVES ?

...

But here's a thought. The thought being that THEY are Conservatives, and YOU are not ...

My god you're a dumb-A* idiot. How can I be more clear? You're an idiot and I tell you so and I disagree with you a) because you're an idiot, and b) because you're not a conservative. If I disagree with some people it's not because they're talking about conservatism it's because they are not.

Are you purposely this dumb?

[Thunderknuckles]

From my view, FJ is a moderate conservative and part time contrarian like myself which I know makes us a seem leftist in the eyes of hard right conservatives. Regardless, Drummond and FJ just don't like each other LOL.
Reminds me of the fights ConHog would get into even though I got along with the guy.

[fj1200]

^ I won't disagree but get ready for a post that takes issue with the truth you speak.

Margaret Thatcher might even make an appearance.

[LongTermGuy]

*And the off topic fighting/arguing continues.......

[tailfins]

^ I won't disagree but get ready for a post that takes issue with the truth you speak.

Margaret Thatcher might even make an appearance.

It shows that some of these people don't have a job. Any idiot can beat their chest and talk smack. I live in:

[Drummond]

From my view, FJ is a moderate conservative and part time contrarian like myself which I know makes us a seem leftist in the eyes of hard right conservatives. Regardless, Drummond and FJ just don't like each other LOL.
Reminds me of the fights ConHog would get into even though I got along with the guy.

FJ claims to be 'Thatcherite' ... though even HE has found the decency to drop the 'Ultimate Thatcherite' tag.

But he doesn't even know basics about her. He had to be told of the existence of the Thatcher Foundation. I've had to point out to him that Lady Thatcher often took what he'd call 'Big Government' decisions, which she considered fully consistent with her Conservative bona fides (e.g she was Leader of the British Conservative Party !!). He opposes - he SAYS - Big Government behaviour, but is somehow wilfully blind to Lady Thatcher's own use of it, when she NEEDED to use it, to advance Conservatism.

... 'Funny', that ... eh ??

He was also ignorant of 'Section 28' legislation, which she introduced -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_28

Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 caused the controversial addition of Section 2A to the Local Government Act 1986 (affecting England, Wales and Scotland and Northern Ireland), enacted on 24 May 1988. The amendment stated that a local authority "shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality" or "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship"

Here, we have an example of State power crafted to influence moral teaching .. INSTITUTED by Lady Thatcher. Doing this didn't bother her at all.

Fact is that FJ keeps on tripping himself up. This he then disguises by stupid trickery ... abusive post rewrites, straight insults, whatever it takes to distract from his various mistakes and inconsistencies. That he keeps on singling out OTHER Conservatives for attack, too .. just happening to be THOSE LEAST LIKELY TO LISTEN TO HIM .... should be highly instructive in itself.

[Drummond]

^ I won't disagree but get ready for a post that takes issue with the truth you speak.

Margaret Thatcher might even make an appearance.

... and I've posted it, FJ.

FJ, you're fraudulent. You attack me, using pathetic diversionary tactics in the process, because you know you cannot counter what I post.

You've also posted what you have to Thunderknuckles in the hope of preparing him to not be receptive to anything I have to say.

That you will very strongly attack any Conservative, here on this forum (- and YOU DO -), anyone not buying what you claim for yourself ... SHOULD be one hell of a giveaway in itself. You call them 'knuckleheads' ... don't you ?

Any request from me for a list of precisely who they are, has so far not been answered. HAS IT ? After all - posting such a list would, of itself, be problematic for you, accentuating your difficulty in maintaining your image ....

[fj1200]

FJ pwns me

Made all the more comical by what I also included in the post. I highlighted it in red for you.

... get ready...

Margaret Thatcher might even make an appearance.

... and I've posted it, FJ.

FJ, you're fraudulent. You attack me, using pathetic diversionary tactics in the process, because you know you cannot counter what I post.

You've also posted what you have to Thunderknuckles in the hope of preparing him to not be receptive to anything I have to say.

That you will very strongly attack any Conservative, here on this forum (- and YOU DO -), anyone not buying what you claim for yourself ... SHOULD be one hell of a giveaway in itself. You call them 'knuckleheads' ... don't you ?

Any request from me for a list of precisely who they are, has so far not been answered. HAS IT ? After all - posting such a list would, of itself, be problematic for you, accentuating your difficulty in maintaining your image ....

I'm pretty sure that he already knows what prattle would seep out of your post. Because he is neither a knucklehead nor an idiot. I wish I could say the same for you but every time I turn around you're posting the same old tripe showing that you have no capacity to debate a subject straight up. I can easily not call you an idiot (until you revert to idiocy that is) but you can't break through your imagination without rehashing your failed leftie/agenda lies. You are a fool.

And how many times do I have to say that I won't "very strongly attack any Conservative" but I will point out to idiots when they are being one. Let's try this one, point out who around here thinks I'm a leftie, without an ability to prove it, and I think you'll have a starter list of knuckleheads.

[Drummond]

Yet more of your rewrites. You really worry about what I reveal about you, don't you ?

Your reference to Margaret Thatcher -- your red text, YOUR invention -- suggests a delusional mind at work. It hardly helps your case, to put it mildly.

I'm pretty sure that he already knows what prattle would seep out of your post. Because he is neither a knucklehead nor an idiot.

Translation ... you see him as a Conservative who's prepared to support you. He's therefore not in line to be called a 'knucklehead' himself .. for as long as he does support you.

Those who fail to buy into your rot, however .. for them, it's a different story. You feel NO kinship WHATEVER for anyone failing to be conned by you ... naturally not.

Certainly, their Conservatism is wholly irrelevant to you. As, indeed, it would be.

I'm still waiting for that list of 'knuckleheads' from you. But of course, if you provide it, you'd be naming people who earn respect here ... eh ? Could divide opinion if you offer it .. yes ? And yes, they themselves may have something to say about the attacks you'd launch on them ...

Better, then, to avoid such questions. We cannot have yet more doubts raised about you .. eh, FJ ?

I wish I could say the same for you but every time I turn around you're posting the same old tripe showing that you have no capacity to debate a subject straight up. I can easily not call you an idiot (until you revert to idiocy that is) but you can't break through your imagination without rehashing your failed leftie/agenda lies. You are a fool.

And yet, for all that ... you just seemingly CANNOT 'quote' a post from me, in such a way that encourages fair and even-handed debate !!! You very obviously fear such a debate, so you go in for trolling as your escape mechanism.

If you're not a Leftie, why must you be as slippery as one ? H'mm ??

And how many times do I have to say that I won't "very strongly attack any Conservative"

Try .... UNTIL YOU STOP ATTACKING THEM !!!

Let's try this one, point out who around here thinks I'm a leftie, without an ability to prove it, and I think you'll have a starter list of knuckleheads.

Translation of your comment: people need to accept what you claim for yourself ... and you'll attack them if they question you. The evidence I've already offered, by the way, speaks for itself.

Tell me, do you feel another attack on British Conservatives coming along ... your excuse for same, regardless of their spectacular success in tackling our economy, WHICH MADE NO DIFFERENCE TO YOUR STANCE WHATEVER AGAINST THEM ... was, as you'll recall ... 'Austerity Sucks' .. ?

I'm sure our British Lefties, if they knew of your existence, would've cheered your efforts on their behalf ...

[jimnyc]

First, you need to learn the common meaning of "communicable by air." Someone's sneeze is not going to travel across a room.
There is quite a bit of difference between living conditions here and in affected areas of Africa. We have proper sanitation methods here. We have clean water and soap. We don't have thousands of people living on top of each other.
I could ride the subway next to someone with Ebola and not catch it. As long as I don't kiss that person, or wipe his nose with my hand.
The real "idiots and morons" are those who are causing a panic with no reason to.

Just saw this now. Yes, you COULD ride next to someone and not catch it, and you CAN catch it - and MUCH easier than you think, and have been told endless times now. You've been showed word directly from WHO and the CDC quite a few times now, talking about a simple sneeze and such, and you still deny it. That person could have sneezed prior to you getting on the subway and they sit there silently. You simply touch the chair or post where they sneezed - and guess what? It only takes one droplet to transfer that disease to you. Now granted, sick ebola patient probably won't be on the subway - but it's YOU who is diminishing the virus and trying to claim that unless you physically touch someone you'll be fine, and that's 100% wrong.

From prior posts to you. Not going over the entire thing again, just enough to show that you're clueless as to how things travel via sneezing and how one can get such droplets - and it sure isn't only from kissing or wiping with his hand.

"If you are sniffling and sneezing, you produce microorganisms that can get on stuff in a room. If people touch them, they could be” infected, said Dr. Meryl Nass, of the Institute for Public Accuracy in Washington, DC.

“Droplet spread happens when germs traveling inside droplets that are coughed or sneezed from a sick person enter the eyes, nose or mouth of another person”

This was directly from the CDC as well:

[Thunderknuckles]

You've also posted what you have to Thunderknuckles in the hope of preparing him to not be receptive to anything I have to say.

It's all good Drummond. You're a good chap and I'm glad you're here

[Drummond]

It's all good Drummond. You're a good chap and I'm glad you're here

Very appreciated ! If the computer I'm currently using allowed me to add smilies', I'd add some 'clap' ones ...

[... Beware of an upcoming FJ attack, though ...]

[Drummond]

Just saw this now. Yes, you COULD ride next to someone and not catch it, and you CAN catch it - and MUCH easier than you think, and have been told endless times now. You've been showed word directly from WHO and the CDC quite a few times now, talking about a simple sneeze and such, and you still deny it. That person could have sneezed prior to you getting on the subway and they sit there silently. You simply touch the chair or post where they sneezed - and guess what? It only takes one droplet to transfer that disease to you. Now granted, sick ebola patient probably won't be on the subway - but it's YOU who is diminishing the virus and trying to claim that unless you physically touch someone you'll be fine, and that's 100% wrong.

From prior posts to you. Not going over the entire thing again, just enough to show that you're clueless as to how things travel via sneezing and how one can get such droplets - and it sure isn't only from kissing or wiping with his hand.



This was directly from the CDC as well:

Pity that Gabby hasn't seen some of our advert graphics .... every winter, we get 'health awareness' ads warning of how easily colds and flu droplets spread through the air (and the scenario they painted for London Underground travellers was horrific .. apparently a sneeze travels at 60MPH ?) Strangely enough, since Ebola, I've not seen ONE of those on our TV screens ..

[fj1200]

Very appreciated ! If the computer I'm currently using allowed me to add smilies', I'd add some 'clap' ones ...

[... Beware of an upcoming FJ attack, though ...]

Is this you being wrong again? But yes, he deserves some applause.

From my view, FJ is a moderate conservative and part time contrarian like myself...