Well I believe the paper on the enzymes and evolution in the above is here.
http://www.indiana.edu/~lynchlab/PDF...romiscuity.pdf
here are a few more I papers i found on the role of enzyme evolution by folks that promote evolution.
Enzyme promiscuity: engine of evolutionary innovation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210039
Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/791073
Enzyme Evolution Explained
http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/p...psb00/dean.pdf
But reread the post itself, it's fairly clear on what it means by evolution of enzymes. it's talking about change in function to allow new activity i believe. those responding to the ID people seem to use the term and concept as well.
So i'm not sure what you mean. are you saying that those kind of imagined changes they are asserting are NOT real evolution? that the word for it is wrong? Are you saying since it's so far at the beginning stages that it's not really part of the evolution story?
There's nothing disingenuous going on here so I don't see what you mean.