Originally Posted by
red state
DMP said it best in a few words regarding his not liking her honesty without the usual @$$ KISSING but I wanted to go step by step on this one:
EVALUATION:
When I first started watching, I though: "What the heck....that was a good stop....and nothing happened about a fight, exchange of words or anything." THEN I saw that the cop did something that is legal in only a few States or area that I know of and if it wasn't legal for him to do so (HE BROKE THE LAW LONG BEFORE HE PULLED THIS GAL OVER). I also saw a difference in his approach and the first person he pulled over should have had her insurance papers, wrote her a ticket and then (AFTER) she presented proof of insurance, have the ticket tore up. I only wish that could get off as easy as the first one did.
Now, back to Ms. Bland; the cop seemed pleasant enough and she, like me and right off the bat, was a bit "hostile" for even being pulled over but she, like me, probably sees much of what the cops could or SHOULD be doing with all the illegal border invaders, drugs and violence out there without worrying about someone driving wrongly (YET SAFER THAN HE DID JUST SECONDS EARLIER). But then, cops for the most part have always seemed 'ABOVE' the law in such insignificant matters.
As for his asking (where are you headed to know); that is NONE of his business and I absolutely HATE when asked that! I have to bite my tongue every time on that one cuz I'd really like to respond with a (THAT'S NONE-YA-BUSINESS). In the cop's defense at this point, I will say that from what my dad's trooper customers have told him is how defiant and blacks in general have become since B.O. came into office (as if they are now above any of the regulations we all much comply with). Still, if I were a cop......you'd have to be driving pretty KraZily before I'd pull you over cuz I'm looking for towel heads and REAL criminals before pulling over this lady. Of course, folks such as this usually don't shoot back so we see more of the "BULLY" crap from cops.
From around 9:15, everything changes. YES, she was irritated BUT, he asked her a question and she TRUTHFULLY and respectfully answered. He then asked her to put out her cig (which is TOTALLY wrong)!!!! It was BS from the start or he would have and should have asked her to do that from the get-go.
WHAT IF SHE HAD A XTRA LARGE SLURPPY.......IS SHE SUPPOSED TO DUMP IT OUT JUST BECAUSE IT CAN ALSO BE FLUNG AT THE OFFICER?!!!!! Jeff, I wouldn't have put it out either (cuz I smoke a pipe and you NEVER re-start a good cigar or pipe)!!!!! SCREW HIM when he asks if I have a gun....none of his business. She is also right in that she does NOT have to step out of the car OR her house unless they have probably cause or a search warrant. He most definitely did not have the right to open her door or escalate an incident that was obviously NOT drug related or any other illegal activity (other than his not liking the fact that he's being treated any differently than any other p-on the pisses folks off..............TOTAL ABUSE OF POWER!!!! I would want my wife to be in this situation or aid in escalating the obvious problem from a hurt-feelings bully but if he stooped over to grab her like that, I truly believe he'd have had at least two in the chest by now....and her favorite nephew is a cop and that is the standard she (I) hold all cops to.
At 10:36, she complies and he should have then calmed down (professionally) and explained to her that he overacted.....especially after she reminded him that this entire ordeal was for "failure to signal". UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!! No, the cop was TOTALLY wrong and had no business at this point to cuff her.....all he was doing was getting his "FACE" back. DESPICABLE whimp.....she classified him correctly was truthful and this whole thing should see the cop washing dishes somewhere. She most definitely had the RIGHT to ask why she was being arrested!!!!!! and if she was not being arrested for drug possession or was not complying (which she had THRICE by putting out her cig, exiting the car and putting her phone down). She was right about him being a coward (especially the part about COURT). He got more aggressive and nervous about that.
Now, at this point, she is TOTALLY defenseless (YET) I read where ya'll said she was thrown to the ground........let me continue watching.
OK, he also had no business removing her glasses. This happened AFTER she pointed out & reminded him that this escalated when he asked her a question (which she truthfully replied). He was expecting some @$$ KISS response but he didn't care for the honesty. I'll say this: it is a wonder that more cops aren't killed after the ticket has been paid and all seems well cuz if he had done my wife like this.........I'll stomp his sorry @$$ a year from now and try not to kill him. Some maniac with the average hunting rifle would definitely do more than what I'd intend and after watching this.......I almost believe that more like the cop who shot the guy in the back AND this woman, need to get the ultimate punishment (or at least an extremely severe one) for undermining the public's trust and tarnishing the badge.
Now at 13:33, she was a stupid hepher for NOT shutting her stupid mouth cuz at this point, she is defenseless and obviously at the WILL of a sorry @$$ SOB!!! It is really pathetic how he KNEW where they would be out of the camera's view and I hope they ALL have to wear the shirt cams soon. It is also funny that he keeps us informed by saying this or that when it is obvious that he inflicted pain and then say that she is now RESISTING ARREST after letting this puny cop handcuff her. THIS I WHY THEY'D BETTER HAVE A GOOD REASON FOR ARRESTING ME AND WHY IT IS A GOOD REASON TO "LAWFULLY" PULL OVER IN A SAVE OR EVEN PUBLIC AREA FOR ALL TO SEE (IF POSSIBLE. I'm not letting some @$$HOLE kick this ole dog just because he had a bad day or got chewed out by the ole lady.
At 14:20, he asks a "WITNESS" to leave. Now, he can tell someone to move back if he feels threatened or fears a crime scene will be defiled, but he can't tell someone to LEAVE or stop filming!!!! THEY (and I've said this before) ARE THE LAW.......NOT GOD ALMIGHTY!!!!!!!
15:45. Someone was obviously filming.....where's that footage? For a none-violent person, who has complied.....he should have, at the very least, waited for a super or a female officer. 17 something, she didn't kick me too hard.....POOR BABY!!!! That happened when he illegally attacked her and entered her car without probable cause or a search warrant!!!!!!
I quite watching at 18:25.......I believe it was all said and done at that point but in response to the thread's opening remarks:
Being hateful (or TRUTHFUL WHEN ASKED A QUESTION) is not against the law or justification to be shot or rough up a defenseless women (who could possible stomp 'shorty's' @$$ if they were in a ring or octagon.