Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: It takes two

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457674

    Default It takes two

    after the Hiroshima disaster Japan still refuses to surrender so on this day the B-29 named Bockscar dropped the 2nd bomb called "fatman" and Nagasaki disappears. bringing the most destructive war in history to a close



    then and now link

  2. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, Drummond, Jeff thanked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    after the Hiroshima disaster Japan still refuses to surrender so on this day the B-29 named Bockscar dropped the 2nd bomb called "fatman" and Nagasaki disappears. bringing the most destructive war in history to a close



    then and now link
    Next World War will be with the Muslims and hundreds of millions will die. They get nukes and its off to the races.
    They think Allah will protect them from our nukes--A most dangerous delusion!!!
    Dangerous for us, for them and for the rest of the world.-Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  4. Thanks Drummond, namvet, Jeff thanked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    Next World War will be with the Muslims and hundreds of millions will die. They get nukes and its off to the races.
    They think Allah will protect them from our nukes--A most dangerous delusion!!!
    Dangerous for us, for them and for the rest of the world.-Tyr
    first Tyr we need C-N-C that can ram it cram it slam it jam it right up their ass's.

  6. Thanks Tyr-Ziu Saxnot thanked this post
  7. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    USA, Southern
    Posts
    27,683
    Thanks (Given)
    32441
    Thanks (Received)
    17532
    Likes (Given)
    3631
    Likes (Received)
    3156
    Piss Off (Given)
    21
    Piss Off (Received)
    2
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475257

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    first Tyr we need C-N-C that can ram it cram it slam it jam it right up their ass's.
    None running qualify to do that but the closest would be TRUMP IMHO..
    The others would seek appeasement first--its in their Natures.
    Trump is not an appeasement minded guy.
    One of his strong suits is he is a fighter that fights to win!! -Tyr
    18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  8. Thanks Jeff thanked this post
  9. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    None running qualify to do that but the closest would be TRUMP IMHO..
    The others would seek appeasement first--its in their Natures.
    Trump is not an appeasement minded guy.
    One of his strong suits is he is a fighter that fights to win!! -Tyr
    brother im with you. strange they never asked Trump about national Security.

  10. Thanks Jeff thanked this post
  11. #6
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    583
    Thanks (Given)
    388
    Thanks (Received)
    708
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot View Post
    Next World War will be with the Muslims and hundreds of millions will die. They get nukes and its off to the races.
    They think Allah will protect them from our nukes--A most dangerous delusion!!!
    Dangerous for us, for them and for the rest of the world.-Tyr
    We're already in a war with radical Muslims, but we're fighting it with moderate Muslims.

    As for nukes, I'm convinced that we'll see a city nuked in our lifetimes; yes even old farts like myself pushing 60. OTOH, I doubt it will turn into a world-destroying nuclear exchange. We seem to have evolved past that particular stage.

    If we were making money bets, I'd bet the first city to be lost would be in the Middle East. If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it. If it's in Israel, we'd see a few more nukes in response.
    Last edited by Max R.; 08-09-2015 at 05:23 PM. Reason: typo

  12. Thanks Jeff thanked this post
  13. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max R. View Post
    We're already in a war with radical Muslims, but we're fighting it with moderate Muslims.

    As for nukes, I'm convinced that we'll see a city nuked in our lifetimes; yes even old farts like myself pushing 60. OTOH, I doubt it will turn into a world-destroying nuclear exchange. We seem to have evolved past that particular stage.

    If we were making money bets, I'd bet the first city to be lost would be in the Middle East. If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it. If it's in Israel, we'd see a few more nukes in response.
    No one would "win" a modern nuclear war. Everyone would lose. The state of modern thermonuclear weaponry has advanced to the state where one exchange would poison the atmosphere and trigger a climate change that would wipe everyone out.
    This is my point about Iran having nukes. If they ever detonate one, it would destroy that entire region.
    Also, your point where "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it" is totally invalid. Don't forget that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have nukes.
    Obviously you have not thought this question out.

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Mouth of the Rogue River, Oregon USA
    Posts
    9,585
    Thanks (Given)
    8103
    Thanks (Received)
    7926
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1560
    Piss Off (Given)
    3
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    19808674

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    No one would "win" a modern nuclear war. Everyone would lose. The state of modern thermonuclear weaponry has advanced to the state where one exchange would poison the atmosphere and trigger a climate change that would wipe everyone out.
    This is my point about Iran having nukes. If they ever detonate one, it would destroy that entire region.
    Also, your point where "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it" is totally invalid. Don't forget that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have nukes.
    Obviously you have not thought this question out.
    Again, Obviously you do not know what your are talking about.

    Pakistan has nukes;
    Saudi does not.

    Nobody with the power wants to use it...

    Us, the Brits, the French, Israel, China, even Russia and the Ukraine.

    Allowing Iran, a former ally, and N Korea to unlimited access with their unstable and
    rogue governments is a huge error..

    Thanks Liberals such as You...and Obama
    I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?

    "I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"

    A Deplorable!

  15. #9
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    583
    Thanks (Given)
    388
    Thanks (Received)
    708
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    340515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    No one would "win" a modern nuclear war. Everyone would lose. The state of modern thermonuclear weaponry has advanced to the state where one exchange would poison the atmosphere and trigger a climate change that would wipe everyone out.
    This is my point about Iran having nukes. If they ever detonate one, it would destroy that entire region.
    Also, your point where "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it" is totally invalid. Don't forget that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have nukes.
    Obviously you have not thought this question out.
    1. I'm not talking about a nuclear "war". Take a Xanax and read my post again. I said a city. Yes, I also said if it was an Israeli city, there'd be a few more, but that wouldn't be the end of the world...well, not for most of us. It would certainly wreak havoc on the region's environment.

    2. You need to read more about nukes. Perhaps reading up on the days of open air nuclear testing would educate you about the effects of such weapons on the environment.

    3. As for "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it", Saudi Arabia doesn't have nukes. Again, a little more education on your part would be greatly beneficial: http://www.businessinsider.com/nine-...try-has-2014-6


  16. Thanks Jeff thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums