after the Hiroshima disaster Japan still refuses to surrender so on this day the B-29 named Bockscar dropped the 2nd bomb called "fatman" and Nagasaki disappears. bringing the most destructive war in history to a close
then and now link
after the Hiroshima disaster Japan still refuses to surrender so on this day the B-29 named Bockscar dropped the 2nd bomb called "fatman" and Nagasaki disappears. bringing the most destructive war in history to a close
then and now link
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code § 2381-Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
We're already in a war with radical Muslims, but we're fighting it with moderate Muslims.
As for nukes, I'm convinced that we'll see a city nuked in our lifetimes; yes even old farts like myself pushing 60. OTOH, I doubt it will turn into a world-destroying nuclear exchange. We seem to have evolved past that particular stage.
If we were making money bets, I'd bet the first city to be lost would be in the Middle East. If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it. If it's in Israel, we'd see a few more nukes in response.
Last edited by Max R.; 08-09-2015 at 05:23 PM. Reason: typo
No one would "win" a modern nuclear war. Everyone would lose. The state of modern thermonuclear weaponry has advanced to the state where one exchange would poison the atmosphere and trigger a climate change that would wipe everyone out.
This is my point about Iran having nukes. If they ever detonate one, it would destroy that entire region.
Also, your point where "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it" is totally invalid. Don't forget that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have nukes.
Obviously you have not thought this question out.
Again, Obviously you do not know what your are talking about.
Pakistan has nukes;
Saudi does not.
Nobody with the power wants to use it...
Us, the Brits, the French, Israel, China, even Russia and the Ukraine.
Allowing Iran, a former ally, and N Korea to unlimited access with their unstable and
rogue governments is a huge error..
Thanks Liberals such as You...and Obama
I have lost my mind. If found, please give it a snack and return it?
"I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of others"...John Wayne in "The Shootist"
A Deplorable!
1. I'm not talking about a nuclear "war". Take a Xanax and read my post again. I said a city. Yes, I also said if it was an Israeli city, there'd be a few more, but that wouldn't be the end of the world...well, not for most of us. It would certainly wreak havoc on the region's environment.
2. You need to read more about nukes. Perhaps reading up on the days of open air nuclear testing would educate you about the effects of such weapons on the environment.
3. As for "If it's a Muslim country, then that would be it", Saudi Arabia doesn't have nukes. Again, a little more education on your part would be greatly beneficial: http://www.businessinsider.com/nine-...try-has-2014-6