Blaze at giant London mosque

[Gunny]

You presented a fallacy.



I have no answer for a ridiculous question with an unproven posit.

YOU are the one presenting the fallacy. Trying to play word games with the law while ignoring the reality. And you're cherrypicking.

Where are your posts on the churches that have been burnt down HERE?

Where are your posts defending those that try and stop the crimes from the politicians on down?

Where's your outcry about beheaded Christians in Africa and the Middle East?

Didn't think so. But one mosque gets burned down and you're suddenly Mr Political Opinion.

[fj1200]

YOU are the one presenting the fallacy. Trying to play word games with the law while ignoring the reality. And you're cherrypicking.

Where are your posts on the churches that have been burnt down HERE?

Where are your posts defending those that try and stop the crimes from the politicians on down?

Where's your outcry about beheaded Christians in Africa and the Middle East?

Didn't think so. But one mosque gets burned down and you're suddenly Mr Political Opinion.

ID the fallacy and word games please.

Churches being burned... Bad.

Defending people trying to stop crimes... Good.

Beheadings... Bad.

And I'm always Mr. Political Opinion. Just ask me (a good question).

[Gunny]

ID the fallacy and word games please.

Churches being burned... Bad.

Defending people trying to stop crimes... Good.

Beheadings... Bad.

And I'm always Mr. Political Opinion. Just ask me (a good question).

Still trying huh? I think I made my point in my previous post. You cherrypick your words AND arguments. You're silent on issues, then want to make a political statement on others.

I'm a strategist, an analyst and spent high school in journalism. I see what you DO say and what you DON'T. Where again is your commentary on the beheadings? The Southern churches? Yet, this is arson. I think my point is obvious and word games ain't going to swirl around anything but the Tidy bowl.

[fj1200]

Still trying huh? I think I made my point in my previous post. You cherrypick your words AND arguments. You're silent on issues, then want to make a political statement on others.

I'm a strategist, an analyst and spent high school in journalism. I see what you DO say and what you DON'T. Where again is your commentary on the beheadings? The Southern churches? Yet, this is arson. I think my point is obvious and word games ain't going to swirl around anything but the Tidy bowl.

You made your point poorly. I must apologize that my posting doesn't measure up to your fine standard. Nevertheless nobody here defended a church burning hoping that it was purposely set as an act of patriotism. Point out where that happened and I'll make the same comment; it's possible that I've overlooked it. Is anyone suggesting a beheading is a good act that should be emulated? I'll duly call them out.

I would think you'd have studied fallacies a bit more closely in HS journalism and sticking to the facts because I think you missed some relevant ones here.

[Jeff]

Correction: Nothing says PAYBACK like arson. I'd prefer a rifle myself.

Me I would prefer a dull knife, give them what they give.

[Drummond]

I have no answer for a ridiculous question with an unproven posit.

You really hate it when a point is made that might cause you to reveal what your real thought processes are ... don't you ?

Instead, you hide behind semantics.

[Gunny]

You made your point poorly. I must apologize that my posting doesn't measure up to your fine standard. Nevertheless nobody here defended a church burning hoping that it was purposely set as an act of patriotism. Point out where that happened and I'll make the same comment; it's possible that I've overlooked it. Is anyone suggesting a beheading is a good act that should be emulated? I'll duly call them out.

I would think you'd have studied fallacies a bit more closely in HS journalism and sticking to the facts because I think you missed some relevant ones here.

Actually, I made my point perfectly. You do exactly what I stated. Now you're trying to jockey around topics and words again.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Actually, I made my point perfectly. You do exactly what I stated. Now you're trying to jockey around topics and words again.

EEE-ZACTLY. In my previous long running battle here with Jafar the muzzie, he championed Jafar out the whazoo.

Best way to avoid strong winning points made against his views is for him to play the old semantics game to the hilt. That he does quite well.
But it does not over well with we that easily see through it like a telescope. -Tyr

[Gunny]

EEE-ZACTLY. In my previous long running battle here with Jafar the muzzie, he championed Jafar out the whazoo.

Best way to avoid strong winning points made against his views is for him to play the old semantics game to the hilt. That he does quite well.
But it does not over well with we that easily see through it like a telescope. -Tyr

Arson's a good thing with about 6 ounces of C-4. You can make quite a splash.

[fj1200]

You really hate it when a point is made that might cause you to reveal what your real thought processes are ... don't you ?

Instead, you hide behind semantics.

This coming from the guy who hides behind "if" statements. FWIW, you didn't make an actual point, you presented an unsubstantiated inference. So either present evidence that Muslims receive beneficial treatment then I'll have an actual question to answer. My guess is you'll whine about abuse or something and drag this thread into your blustery-sputtering world.

Actually, I made my point perfectly. You do exactly what I stated. Now you're trying to jockey around topics and words again.

Nope. I identify poor reasoning skills. You could address what I posted or you can just repeat your mantra again.

EEE-ZACTLY.

Hiding behind others again I see. I think there's a word for that but you'll just scream something about semantics and my mean posting.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Hiding behind others again I see. I think there's a word for that but you'll just scream something about semantics and my mean posting.

What? Me hide! Are you insane-- how many times have I brought your dumb-ass down to the cage?
I hide from nobody--IF I EVER DID, IT DAMN SURE WOULD NOT BE FROM THE LIKES OF YOU!

Try getting an amen here for that damn lie that you just told. -Tyr

[fj1200]

What? Me hide!

Yup. You even slink away in your own cage threads. I don't use the ignore feature to hide from words I don't like.

[Gunny]

This coming from the guy who hides behind "if" statements. FWIW, you didn't make an actual point, you presented an unsubstantiated inference. So either present evidence that Muslims receive beneficial treatment then I'll have an actual question to answer. My guess is you'll whine about abuse or something and drag this thread into your blustery-sputtering world.



Nope. I identify poor reasoning skills. You could address what I posted or you can just repeat your mantra again.



Hiding behind others again I see. I think there's a word for that but you'll just scream something about semantics and my mean posting.

I address what you post, junior. Then you try to wordsmith it into something else. My reasoning skills are just fine. I can see EXACTLY what game you play and I called you on it. Addressing one of your posts is like trying to figure out which way a moth is going to fly.

[fj1200]

I address what you post, junior. Then you try to wordsmith it into something else. My reasoning skills are just fine. I can see EXACTLY what game you play and I called you on it. Addressing one of your posts is like trying to figure out which way a moth is going to fly.

I don't even know what you're on about anymore. One person posted about patriotic arson, another posted a rhetorical question based on an unsubstantiated claim, and you're finding fault with me. I don't know what to say about that.

[Gunny]

I don't even know what you're on about anymore. One person posted about patriotic arson, another posted a rhetorical question based on an unsubstantiated claim, and you're finding fault with me. I don't know what to say about that.

Same as always. If you think I have the time or attention span to read every post in this thread, I got a baby on my hip, bubba. Hard to type this way, BTW. I commented on a post YOU made.

So your next move is to turn it into a "me" thing? NEVER play chess with ME.