Scientists Theorize the Big Bang may not Have happened

[Perianne]

You apparently had salsa in your pockets.

Men are always hot in their pants...or they think they are. Many of them have small peppers.




Another funny by Perianne!!!!!

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

BBT has nothing to do with God. For some reason people think it does. We might as well be talking about how my spicy salsa disproves God's existance.

BBT has nothing to do with God.

Utter rot, scientists and teachers have for over 4 decades taught that God did not make the universe and the example they gave was the Big Bang Theory!

So yes, it has a lot to do with God as it was then and is now still used to refute God's word in the bible.
That you deny that reality points to something very suspicious to me .

Are you Gnosticbishop , the member that posts insane threads??-Tyr

[Black Diamond]

Utter rot, scientists and teachers have for over 4 decades taught that God did not make the universe and the example they gave was the Big Bang Theory!

So yes, it has a lot to do with God as it was then and is now still used to refute God's word in the bible.
That you deny that reality points to something very suspicious to me .

Are you Gnosticbishop , the member that posts insane threads??-Tyr

Well said, Tyr.

[pete311]

Utter rot, scientists and teachers have for over 4 decades taught that God did not make the universe and the example they gave was the Big Bang Theory!

So yes, it has a lot to do with God as it was then and is now still used to refute God's word in the bible.
That you deny that reality points to something very suspicious to me .

Are you Gnosticbishop , the member that posts insane threads??-Tyr

These are not the theory's fault. In no scientific paper does it say anything about God. If teachers use it for an agenda that is their fault. Just like how guns don't kill people. Right?

[Drummond]

The fact is that the big bang theory has been very successful.

So were the Harry Potter books. Can we all start believing in witchcraft ?

There are some holes to be worked out, but it explains an awful lot. Throwing that in the trash just because of some "what ifs" and replacing it all with. "Well, it's God's will" it totally stupid and we've never technologically advance.

Well ... 'what ifs' are (or can be) an excellent basis for creating theories ! You should welcome them.

And those 'holes' could be highly critical ones. If a theory does NOT fit the known facts, this can mean ..

1. We don't have all the facts, &/ or ..

2. The theory just doesn't work. It needs to be rethought.

Perhaps one massive hole - even if not a black one - is to remove God from the equation .. ?

But Pete, tell me. Why do you so strongly deny the inclusion of God's will in your thinking ? From what CERTAIN KNOWLEDGE do you choose to do this ? Any at all ?

Or are you letting preference get in the way of scientific objectivity ?

[Drummond]

I'm not going to address is idiocy.

Sheer bias. Zero objectivity. If you're objective, you should be open to all possibilities, until those possibilities are disproven.

You clearly aren't applying 'scientific method'.

[Drummond]

These are not the theory's fault. In no scientific paper does it say anything about God. If teachers use it for an agenda that is their fault. Just like how guns don't kill people. Right?

Well, now. How's THAT for a massive dose of bias ??

I thought scientific method (in so far as anyone can competently apply it) was open to all possibilities, UNTIL DISproven .. ?

Perhaps what you call 'an agenda', is simply a display of comparative open-mindedness ... an open-mindedness to an alternative which closed minds just choose to summarily reject out of hand ?

Reminds me of the 'flat earth' days. How closed-minded were people back then to any possibility that it WASN'T ?

But never mind. We progressed beyond such primitive times, Pete.

[Drummond]

Utter rot, scientists and teachers have for over 4 decades taught that God did not make the universe and the example they gave was the Big Bang Theory!

So yes, it has a lot to do with God as it was then and is now still used to refute God's word in the bible.
That you deny that reality points to something very suspicious to me .

Are you Gnosticbishop , the member that posts insane threads??-Tyr

I've never really seen that one excludes the other. Why couldn't God have created the Universe in that way ?

God can do anything.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I've never really seen that one excludes the other. Why couldn't God have created the Universe in that way ?

God can do anything.

He could have since he can do anything, but the theory never mentions God and thats why it was created..
To deny God.
Pete just wants to ignore that fact and thus not admit it had a primary purpose- that is and always was to "Lord science' over God. -Tyr

[pete311]

Well ... 'what ifs' are (or can be) an excellent basis for creating theories ! You should welcome them.

This is preciously the reverse of how it actually works. A theory attempts to describe an observation. You don't think of "what ifs" and then try to prove them. Another novice misconception.

[pete311]

Sheer bias. Zero objectivity. If you're objective, you should be open to all possibilities, until those possibilities are disproven.

You clearly aren't applying 'scientific method'.

None of your speculative statements are a hypothesis. Do you even know what the scientific method is?

[pete311]

Well, now. How's THAT for a massive dose of bias ??

I thought scientific method (in so far as anyone can competently apply it) was open to all possibilities, UNTIL DISproven .. ?

God is outside science. There is no way to research the concept. Thus, the big bang theory's goal has nothing to do with God, but just the process of how the universe has changed.

[pete311]

He could have since he can do anything, but the theory never mentions God and thats why it was created..
To deny God.
Pete just wants to ignore that fact and thus not admit it had a primary purpose- that is and always was to "Lord science' over God. -Tyr

Are you upset that the theories of electromagnetism didn't include God? How exactly would you scientifically research God. Please tell me. What experiments would you do?

It seems like you're just trying to say everything should include God. Why does your username not include a reference to God. Why are you denying him. Obviously you have an agenda against him because you didn't include him in your name.

[pete311]

I see now that your name is actually a viking God. How nicely heathen of you.

[pete311]

He could have since he can do anything, but the theory never mentions God and thats why it was created..

Furthermore he's not mentioned, because there is no evidence found. Should there be a little footnote at the end of the paper "*no evidence for God found while studying the Big Bang processes"