Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks (Given)
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    1501
    Likes (Given)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2067947

    Default The "Gun Control" farce

    Thomas Sowell nails it once again.

    Liberals keep pushing for the same tired "laws" that they have already proven don't work.

    And that's because they don't dare look at the actual results... and don't dare let the American people do what the citizens know is best.

    -------------------------------------------------------

    http://townhall.com/columnists/thoma...farce-n2064750

    The 'Gun Control' Farce
    Thomas Sowell | Oct 13, 2015

    President Obama's intrusion into the mourning community of Roseburg, Oregon, in order to promote his political crusade for stronger gun control laws, is part of a pattern of his using various other sites of shooting rampages in the past to promote this long-standing crusade of the political left.

    The zealotry of gun control advocates might make some sense if they had any serious evidence that more restrictive gun control laws actually reduce gun crimes. But they seldom even discuss the issue in terms of empirical evidence.

    Saving lives is serious business. But claiming to be saving lives and refusing to deal with evidence is a farce. Nor is the Second Amendment or the National Rifle Association the real issue, despite how much the media and the intelligentsia focus on them.

    If there is hard evidence that stronger gun control laws actually reduce gun crimes in general or reduce murders in particular, the Second Amendment can be repealed, as other Amendments have been repealed. Constitutional Amendments exist to serve the people. People do not exist to be sacrificed to Constitutional Amendments.

    But if hard evidence shows that restrictions on gun ownership lead to more gun crimes, rather than less, then the National Rifle Association's opposition to those restrictions makes sense, independently of the Second Amendment.


    (full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
    "The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    BRITAIN
    Posts
    958
    Thanks (Given)
    207
    Thanks (Received)
    585
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    628540

    Default

    The gun control crowd relies on dumb down idiots willing to support anything that sounds good.


    Why make somewhere a 'gun free zone' if some nutcase is going to shoot someone then I don't think they care whether they are meant to have guns in that area or not.

    Criminals don't follow gun laws, they don't follow laws full stop that is why they are criminals. Criminals will obtain weapons whether legal or illegally.

    For any anti gunners who think banning guns is actually a good idea then look at Mexico, guns are supposed to be banned and look at the drug war and violence currently ravaging the country.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    2,343
    Thanks (Given)
    243
    Thanks (Received)
    1256
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1282390

    Default

    Fact: Gun Free Zones are not working, as shown by guns brought into Gun Free Zones and used to kill innocent civilians.



    .
    Last edited by indago; 10-13-2015 at 02:39 PM.

  4. Thanks Christie Brinkley thanked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums