Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,733
    Thanks (Given)
    23991
    Thanks (Received)
    17503
    Likes (Given)
    9736
    Likes (Received)
    6182
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475525

    Default Teacher Fired For Teaching Critical Thinking

    Just depressing. One of the best examples of teaching critical thinking through Socratic questioning that I've seen. The teacher is not expressing his own thoughts, pretty much lets the student find his path, by asking questions. A while later, teacher was fired. You're going to have to go to X to see the videos, truly worth your time. While I couldn't catch much the student was saying in first video, the teacher's questioning I kept up with more or less. Wish it had been captioned.


    https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/...fired-n3788317

    Teacher Who Focused on Reason Over Ideology FiredDAVID STROM 6:30 PM | May 14, 2024



    AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis
    Warren Smith, who burst on the scene in February when a video of him discussing J.K. Rowling with students went viral, has been fired from his job.


    You probably recall the video. If not, Elon Musk amplified it, driving its message across the world.




    What made the video interesting was not that Smith defended Rowling--he actually didn't, at least not directly. Instead, he taught students how to examine their beliefs using the Socratic method. He forced them to articulate what they believed, discuss why they believed it, and consider whether the evidence actually supported those beliefs.


    Lesbian writer E.J. Rosetta, about whom I wrote last year, got herself canceled over the same issue and for similar reasons. After being assigned a story at Pride Magazine to expose Rowling as a transphobe, she was eager to do the story until her research showed that Rowling was not a transphobe. She said so, and she was fired.


    She is one of my heroes. She is one the increasing number of gender-critical gays who are helping lead the fight against the trans insanity.


    Smith's fate mirrors hers.




    The school at which Smith taught waited to fire him, assuming that as his fame faded they could do so quietly. For months they kept Smith around, seemingly OK with his commitment to the Socratic method.


    Then, boom. They fired him for his social media posts. They didn't actually specify which posts in particular, and Smith asserts that he followed their policies to the letter. The school refused to elaborate. Rather, they seized his computer (on which he was writing a book) and showed him the door, without letting him recover any of his work.




    Is it possible that there is more to this story? Of course, there is, but until the school opens up about their motivations, we have only Smith's side of the story. And given how overwhelming the pressure is to maintain the alphabet narrative these days, it seems more likely than not that his firing is directly related to the fame he amassed.


    In the education world, being associated with Elon Musk or even the hint of gender-critical wrongthink is deadly, whether you are in private or public schools. Smith is also willing to defend free markets and is critical of big government.


    Horrors!




    Smith was also willing to discuss the protests on college campuses. He wasn't, as far as I can tell, critical of the content as of the conduct--analyzing it and applying the same narrative vs. evidence framing.




    My guess and this is only a guess, is that Warren's ultimate crime was becoming a favorite of the right. He has been featured and positively profiled by conservative media figures. This is clearly not something encouraged in a school setting.


    Before we decide that there should be no ideological discussions in school, you have to recognize that this is a rule that doesn't apply to left-wing teachers in the least. They don't engage in Socratic discussions that lead students to more rational conclusions but rather outright propagandize students. You can find countless videos of teachers admitting that they push Queer ideology on students.


    Smith is only asking students to articulate why they believe as they do. Their inability to do so is a good starting place for education. As Socrates said, knowing that you know nothing is the beginning of wisdom. Beginning with reason rather than feelings is what educators should do.


    Smith is an aspiring filmmaker, and with his newfound fame he is likely to do well enough, especially if he focuses as he has on education. He has a ready-made audience.


    Still, it is sad that even a lone teacher focused on reasoned discussion, in a sea of left ideologues, is too much for educators to bear.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks fj1200, Gunny thanked this post
    Likes SassyLady, revelarts, Gunny liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,137
    Thanks (Given)
    4828
    Thanks (Received)
    4673
    Likes (Given)
    2561
    Likes (Received)
    1592
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075394

    Default

    Many of the "fundamentalist" Christians, have been pointing out this trend since the 1980s. The early homeschool movement saw the writing on the wall.
    It most pointedly arose in the form of teaching/explaining ABOUT religion & also Creation/or the weaknesses of evolution. But other issues as well.

    Many people failed to see the PRINCIPAL involved and always wanted to frame it as "religion" vs state or "teaching" religion. Rather than seeing it as teaching all/more information on a subject and getting students to think about things critically for themselves, based on the evidence presented.
    Nope, can't have that, the public school enforcers want to indoctrinate a narrow POV. nothing else.
    Whole legal groups have been formed to deal with this kind of firing. Firings & threats for daring to give students more to consider than ONE official>secular>woke POV.

    The fundamentalist were the canaries in the coal mine, in the 80-90s (elementary to university teachers)
    Later some scientist from the "intelligent design" camp found out it could happen to them as well.
    2008 film Expelled points out the issue.

    Sad the thing is, i suspect some folks have a hard time seeing the slippery slope here because they are so anti-fundamentalist or anti religion or "separation of church & state"deceived.
    It's the same mindset that thinks that the FBI spying on mosques and labeling them potential terrorist with no evidence is A-OK, while the FBI spying on MY church and labeling me a potential terrorist with no evidence is oppressive tyranny.. by the democrats!.

    Not sure why it's so hard for many folks to see that when a principal is applied that the target content doesn't matter that much, it can change.
    Also that a strictly secular POV is not a format that -by default- is open/free to discuss all POVs.
    Freedom of expression & thought is a fruit/ideal of a Christian world view. As are universities in general.


    2008 film Expelled. about scientist fired from university jobs for 'wrong speak' about evolution
    Last edited by revelarts; Today at 05:00 AM.
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums