More issues I have with Johnson

[stephanie]

Notice we never hear from him unless it's to dump on Trump? he is in this election for ONE THING. to disrupt the votes for the real candidate. he's a lowlife and a traitor in my book

[hjmick]

Call me a "poopaphobic"

Okay, poopaphobic, will you be changing your screen name as well?

[jimnyc]

Okay, poopaphobic, will you be changing your screen name as well?

"jimnyc_hates_poop"? "bigoted_poopman"?

[fj1200]

Semantics. A politician meeting with the public, to hear them out I suppose, is a sort of reward, IMO. I completely disagree with even having had given them the time of day, unless they were acting like human beings, of which they were not.

I'm sorry you disagree with me disagreeing with him agreeing with them. I go back to my opening post, and stand by it. I simply disagree with him for having met with them. Call me nuts, others think so too.

We see what we want to see. But if not calling them filthy animals is tantamount to reward then...

Trump’s entire comments on this matter were rather surprising, starting with his initial impression of the protesters as “very well-dressed,” suggesting they were wealthy themselves: “probably half of their parents worked on Wall Street or for Wall Street-related groups,” he argued. “This is not a poor group of protesters.” That said, Trump added that he found them productive in some regards. “I cherish the protests in a way,” he told Van Susteren, because I may not agree with them as a group, but I do agree it’s time to protest.” Trump concluded that he did think “we should protest how poorly our country is doing,” particularly the fact that the American economy was “being eaten alive by countries that could care less about us, that are at economic war with us.”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-tr...et-protesters/

[stephanie]

Okay, poopaphobic, will you be changing your screen name as well?

hi hjmick, long time no see. lol

[stephanie]

"jimnyc_hates_poop"? "bigoted_poopman"?

alright you two.

[jimnyc]

We see what we want to see. But if not calling them filthy animals is tantamount to reward then...


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-tr...et-protesters/

Did he go down on the street and meet with the grimy pooping bastards? If he did, he's an effing idiot.

[fj1200]

Did he go down on the street and meet with the grimy pooping bastards? If he did, he's an effing idiot.

Couldn't tell ya. I can only tell ya that he "cherishes" them.

[hjmick]

hi hjmick, long time no see. lol

Indeed. Good to see you around.

[jimnyc]

Couldn't tell ya. I can only tell ya that he "cherishes" them.

Yeah, well he certainly isn't right on every issue either. But anyone getting down with the pigs only rewards their behavior in such instances, IMO, and gives them reason to continue their behavior.

[fj1200]

Yeah, well he certainly isn't right on every issue either. But anyone getting down with the pigs only rewards their behavior in such instances, IMO, and gives them reason to continue their behavior.

On the one hand, yes he did talk to them. On the other hand he completely disagrees with them as far as solutions IMO whereas your candidate "cherishes" them. BTW your stated premise is that he agrees with OWS seems to be wrong.

He agreed with the occupy wall street filthy animals...

-----

... while the rest of us — who aren’t too big to fail — are left to sink or swim in an economy the politicians have strangled with deficit spending, over-regulation and punitive taxation?...

http://2012election.procon.org/view....uestionID=1729

I'm pretty sure OWS would not agree with that. So you think he rewarded them but to "cherish" someone is it's own reward is it not?

[jimnyc]

On the one hand, yes he did talk to them. On the other hand he completely disagrees with them as far as solutions IMO whereas your candidate "cherishes" them. BTW your stated premise is that he agrees with OWS seems to be wrong.





I'm pretty sure OWS would not agree with that. So you think he rewarded them but to "cherish" someone is it's own reward is it not?

You can try and deflect and point to Trump all you like, I don't agree with him, so you're wasting your time.

Maybe Johnson was too busy talking drugs with them, or perhaps they had good drugs there. Would explain why he met with folks that he disagrees with completely.

[fj1200]

You can try and deflect and point to Trump all you like, I don't agree with him, so you're wasting your time.

Maybe Johnson was too busy talking drugs with them, or perhaps they had good drugs there. Would explain why he met with folks that he disagrees with completely.

I'm not deflecting, I'm pointing out an incorrect premise and faulty logic along with trying to detect some consistency in applying standards. Since you're supporting trump this particular issue is at least a wash since he seems to have at least a similar stance to Johnson.